Refugee and migrants' involvement in participatory spaces in a US practice-based research network study: Responding to unanticipated priorities.
communication barriers
community-based participatory research
culturally competent care
health services accessibility
refugees and migrants
Journal
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
02
01
2023
received:
16
07
2022
accepted:
02
04
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
20
4
2023
entrez:
20
04
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Refugees and migrants face suboptimal involvement in spaces for primary healthcare decision-making. Given the rising numbers of resettled refugees and migrants in primary care settings in the United States, there is an urgent need for patient-centred outcome research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with diverse ethnolinguistic communities. This study explored whether researchers, clinicians and patients would achieve consensus on (1) a common set of clinical problems that were applicable across a PBRN and (2) potential clinical interventions to address those problems to inform a patient-centred outcomes research (PCOR) study in a similar research network. In this qualitative participatory health research study, patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and clinicians from seven practices in a US PBRN discussed preferences for PCOR responsive to patients and the clinicians who serve them in language-discordant settings. Researchers and an advisory panel that included patients and clinicians from each participating practice held regular advisory meetings to monitor progress on project milestones and solve emerging problems. Participants took part in 10 sessions using Participatory Learning in Action and the World Café methods to identify and prioritise their ideas, using questions set for them by the advisory panel. Data were analysed based on principles of qualitative thematic content analysis. Participants identified common barriers in language-discordant healthcare settings, principally patient-clinician communication barriers and suggestions to overcome these barriers. A key finding was an unanticipated consensus about the need for attention to healthcare processes rather than a clinical research priority. Negotiation with research funders enabled further analysis of potential interventions for care processes to improve communication and shared decision-making in consultations and the practice as a whole. PCOR studies should examine interventions for improving communication between patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and primary care staff if the sorts of harms experienced by patients experiencing language-discordant healthcare are to be reduced or prevented. Flexibility and responsiveness from funders to unanticipated findings are key structural supports for participatory health research in primary care clinical settings with this population and others who experience marginalisation and exclusion. Patients and clinicians participated in the study both in the formulation of the study question, data collection, analysis and dissemination of these results; consented to their individual participation; and reviewed early drafts of the manuscript.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Refugees and migrants face suboptimal involvement in spaces for primary healthcare decision-making. Given the rising numbers of resettled refugees and migrants in primary care settings in the United States, there is an urgent need for patient-centred outcome research in practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with diverse ethnolinguistic communities. This study explored whether researchers, clinicians and patients would achieve consensus on (1) a common set of clinical problems that were applicable across a PBRN and (2) potential clinical interventions to address those problems to inform a patient-centred outcomes research (PCOR) study in a similar research network.
METHODS
METHODS
In this qualitative participatory health research study, patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and clinicians from seven practices in a US PBRN discussed preferences for PCOR responsive to patients and the clinicians who serve them in language-discordant settings. Researchers and an advisory panel that included patients and clinicians from each participating practice held regular advisory meetings to monitor progress on project milestones and solve emerging problems. Participants took part in 10 sessions using Participatory Learning in Action and the World Café methods to identify and prioritise their ideas, using questions set for them by the advisory panel. Data were analysed based on principles of qualitative thematic content analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Participants identified common barriers in language-discordant healthcare settings, principally patient-clinician communication barriers and suggestions to overcome these barriers. A key finding was an unanticipated consensus about the need for attention to healthcare processes rather than a clinical research priority. Negotiation with research funders enabled further analysis of potential interventions for care processes to improve communication and shared decision-making in consultations and the practice as a whole.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
PCOR studies should examine interventions for improving communication between patients from diverse ethnolinguistic communities and primary care staff if the sorts of harms experienced by patients experiencing language-discordant healthcare are to be reduced or prevented. Flexibility and responsiveness from funders to unanticipated findings are key structural supports for participatory health research in primary care clinical settings with this population and others who experience marginalisation and exclusion.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
UNASSIGNED
Patients and clinicians participated in the study both in the formulation of the study question, data collection, analysis and dissemination of these results; consented to their individual participation; and reviewed early drafts of the manuscript.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37078650
doi: 10.1111/hex.13764
pmc: PMC10349241
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1596-1605Subventions
Organisme : Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
ID : 12694
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e045520
pubmed: 34244256
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 10;16(1):32
pubmed: 28222736
Pharm Stat. 2012 Sep-Oct;11(5):410-6
pubmed: 22807372
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):131-40
pubmed: 23246426
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):278-284
pubmed: 27677298
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):159-170
pubmed: 28841753
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):196-201
pubmed: 33337921
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):921
pubmed: 34488719
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):997-1000
pubmed: 16566901
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):571-8
pubmed: 24004709
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Jan;60(1):e32-40
pubmed: 24452576
Milbank Q. 2012 Jun;90(2):311-46
pubmed: 22709390
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Oct;56(2):133-43
pubmed: 17018062
Public Health Rep. 2015 Mar-Apr;130(2):134-42
pubmed: 25729102
Health Promot Int. 2021 Oct 13;36(5):1253-1263
pubmed: 33382890
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):990-1001
pubmed: 29770551
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1596-1605
pubmed: 37078650
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89
pubmed: 24568690
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):5-6
pubmed: 35039405
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Oct;26(10):1164-1176
pubmed: 34169612
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 20;16:25
pubmed: 26792057
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):259
pubmed: 33278882
Ethn Dis. 2016 Oct 20;26(4):537-544
pubmed: 27773981
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 06;3:28
pubmed: 29225922
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):255-256
pubmed: 31023691
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 30;7:75
pubmed: 17537258
Health Policy. 2021 Aug;125(8):1085-1091
pubmed: 34167811
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Feb;26(2):170-6
pubmed: 20878497
Health Place. 2012 May;18(3):536-51
pubmed: 22386985
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 22;6(7):e010822
pubmed: 27449890
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Jun 30;:1-12
pubmed: 35770421
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2031-2033
pubmed: 35983897
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Nov;81(2):222-8
pubmed: 20223615
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 10;31(28):3433-43
pubmed: 22829439