Influence of Complex Training Design on Acute Postactivation Performance Enhancement of Jump Squat and Ballistic Bench Throw Performance in Developing Team-Sport Athletes.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2023
01 May 2023
Historique:
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
26
4
2023
entrez:
26
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Poulos, N, Haff, GG, Nibali, M, Norris, D, and Newton, R. Influence of complex training design on acute postactivation performance enhancement of jump squat and ballistic bench throw performance in developing team-sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res 37(5): 969-979, 2023-The effect of complex training (CT) session design on acute postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) of loaded jump squat(s) (JS) and ballistic bench throw(s) (BBT) was examined. This study further investigated whether relative strength is a moderating factor in PAPE in response to 3 distinct CT protocols. Fourteen Australian Football League (AFL) Academy athletes performed 3 different protocols comprising 85% 1 repetition maximum (1RM) back squats and bench press, and 30% 1RM loaded JS and BBT, differing in the sequencing of exercise order (i.e., complex pairs performed in isolation or with additional exercise interspersed within the intracomplex recovery period) and duration of the intracomplex recovery (2.5, 5, or 15 minutes). Differences in JS and BBT performance between CT protocols were trivial except for JS eccentric depth and eccentric impulse where small to moderate substantial differences were observed between protocols 2 and 3 in various sets; a small difference was observed between protocols 1 and 3 for eccentric depth. Small differences between protocols 1 and 2 were observed in set 1 in BBT peak velocity (ES = -0.26) and peak power (W·kg-1) (ES = -0.31). Small magnitudes of PAPE and decrements in performance were observed in some variables within protocols, yet effects across sets were inconsistent. Relative strength was negatively associated with JS performance (i.e., stronger athletes demonstrated a lower magnitude of PAPE) yet positively associated with PAPE of BBT peak force (N·kg-1) and peak power (W·kg-1). Alternating lower-body and upper-body complex sets and performance of ancillary exercise within the intracomplex recovery does not contribute to cumulative fatigue throughout the session and does not detrimentally affect subsequent JS and BBT performance. The manipulation of complex-set sequences offers practitioners a time-efficient means of providing both lower-body and upper-body heavy-resistance and ballistic training stimuli to achieve chronic training adaptations in maximal strength and power, with targeted improvements in specific kinetic and kinematic variables.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37099303
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004323
pii: 00124278-202305000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
969-979Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Alemdaroğlu U, Dündar U, Köklü Y, Aşci A, Findikoğlu G. The effect of exercise order incorporating plyometric and resistance training on isokinetic leg strength and vertical jump performance: A comparative study. Isokinet Exerc Sci 21: 211–217, 2013.
Available at: https://www.powerlifting.sport/rules/codes/info/technical-rules . Accessed December 29, 2020.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft 67: 1–48, 2015.
Batista MAB, Roschel H, Barroso R, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V. Influence of strength training background on postactivation potentiation response. J Strength Cond Res 25: 2496–2502, 2011.
Bauer P, Sansone P, Mitter B, et al. Acute effects of back squats on countermovement jump performance across multiple sets of a contrast training protocol in resistance-trained males. J Strength Cond Res 33: 995–1000, 2019.
Bauer P. Combining higher-load and lower-load resistance training exercises: A systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from complex training studies. J Sci Med Sport 22: 838–851, 2019.
Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol 74: 359, 1993.
Bevan HR, Bunce PJ, Owen NJ, et al. Optimal loading for the development of peak power output in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 24: 43–47, 2010.
Boullosa D. Post - activation performance enhancement strategies in sport: A brief review for practitioners. Hum Mov 22: 101–109, 2021.
Brandenburg JP. The acute effects of prior dynamic resistance exercise using different loads on subsequent upper-body explosive performance in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 19: 427–432, 2005.
Chavda S, Bromley T, Jarvis P, et al. Force-time characteristics of the countermovement jump: Analyzing the curve in excel. Strength Cond J 40: 67–77, 2018.
Chiu L, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 17: 671–677, 2003.
Cormie P, McBride JM, McCaulley GO. Power-time, force-time, and velocity-time curve analysis during the jump squat: Impact of load. J Appl Biomech 24: 112–120, 2008.
Cormier P, Freitas TT, Rubio-Arias JA, Alcaraz PE. Complex and contrast training: Does strength and power training sequence affect performance-based adaptations in team sports? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 34: 1461–1479, 2020.
Duthie GM, Young WB, Aitken DA. The acute effects of heavy loads on jump squat performance: An evaluation of the complex and contrast methods of power development. J Strength Cond Res 16: 530–538, 2002.
Freitas TT, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Calleja-González J, Alcaraz PE. Short-term adaptations following complex training in team-sports: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 12: 1–19, 2017.
Fukutani A. Influence of the intensity of squat exercises on the subsequent jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 28: 2236–2243, 2014.
Kilduff LP, Owen N, Bevan H, et al. Influence of recovery time on post-activation potentiation in professional rugby players. J Sports Sci 26: 795–802, 2008.
Lenth R. Least-squares means: R package “lsmeans”. Am Stat 4: 216–221, 2016.
Lepkowski M, Leiting KA, Koch AJ. Practical considerations and applications of postactivation performance enhancement in group training: Delayed performance enhancing triplexes. Strength Cond J 43: 62–67, 2021.
Lüdecke D, Makowski D, Waggoner P, Patil I. Performance: Assessment of regression models performance. R package version 0.4, 5, 2020.
MacDonald CJ, Lamont HS, Garner JC. A comparison of the effects of 6 weeks of traditional resistance training, plyometric training, and complex training on measures of strength and anthropometrics. J Strength Cond Res 26: 422–431, 2012.
Mangine GT, Ratamess NA, Hoffman JR, et al. The effects of combined ballistic and heavy resistance training on maximal lower- and upper-body strength in recreationally trained men. J Strength Cond Res 22: 132–139, 2008.
Mihalik JP, Libby JJ, Battaglini CL, McMurray RG. Comparing short-term complex and compound training programs on vertical jump height and power output. J Strength Cond Res 22: 47–53, 2008.
Moir GL, Dale JR, Dietrich WW. The acute effects of heavy back squats on mechanical variables during a series of bilateral hops. J Strength Cond Res 23: 1118–1124, 2009.
Newton RU, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K, Humphries BJ, Murphy AJ. Kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation during explosive upper body movements. J Appl Biomech 12: 31–43, 1996.
Nibali ML, Chapman DW, Robergs RA, Drinkwater EJ. Considerations for determining the time course of post-activation potentiation. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 40: 1163–1170, 2015.
Nibali M. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation: Implications for acute enhancement of muscular power in field-sport athletes. In: School of Human Movement Studies. Charles Sturt University, 2013.
Poulos N, Chaouachi A, Buchheit M, et al. Complex training and countermovement jump performance across multiple sets: Effect of back squat intensity. Kinesiology 50: 75–89, 2018.
Prieske O, Behrens M, Chaabene H, Granacher U, Maffiuletti NA. Time to differentiate postactivation “potentiation” from “performance enhancement” in the strength and conditioning community. Sports Med 50: 1559–1565, 2020.
Robbins DW. Postactivation potentiation and its practical applicability: A brief review. J Strength Cond Res 19: 453–458, 2005.
Scott DJ, Ditroilo M, Marshall PA. Complex training: The effect of exercise selection and training status on postactivation potentiation in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 31: 2694–2703, 2017.
Seitz LB, Haff GG. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 46: 231–240, 2016.
Seitz LB, De Villarreal ES, Haff GG. The temporal profile of postactivation potentiation is related to strength level. J Strength Cond Res 28: 706–715, 2014.
Shepperd JM, Triplett NT. Program design for resistance training. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Haff GG, Triplett-McBride T, eds.Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2016. pp. 1–73.
Tillin N, Bishop D. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med 39: 147–166, 2009.
West DJ. Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 27: 2282–2287, 2013.
Wilson JM, Duncan NM, Marin PJ, et al. Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: Effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res 27: 854–859, 2013.
Young W, Cormack S, Crichton M. Which jump variables should be used to assess explosive leg muscle function? Int J Sports Physiol Perform 6: 51–57, 2011.