Effect of the initial energy layer and spot placement parameters on IMPT delivery efficiency and plan quality.


Journal

Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
revised: 14 03 2023
received: 25 12 2022
accepted: 05 04 2023
medline: 6 9 2023
pubmed: 27 4 2023
entrez: 27 4 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Improving efficiency of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment can be achieved by shortening the beam delivery time. The purpose of this study is to reduce the delivery time of IMPT, while maintaining the plan quality, by finding the optimal initial proton spot placement parameters. Seven patients previously treated in the thorax and abdomen with gated IMPT and voluntary breath-hold were included. In the clinical plans, the energy layer spacing (ELS) and spot spacing (SS) were set to 0.6-0.8 (as a scale factor of the default values). For each clinical plan, we created four plans with ELS increased to 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and SS to 1.0 while keeping all other parameters unchanged. All 35 plans (130 fields) were delivered on a clinical proton machine and the beam delivery time was recorded for each field. Increasing ELS and SS did not cause target coverage reduction. Increasing ELS had no effect on critical organ-at-risk (OAR) doses or the integral dose, while increasing SS resulted in slightly higher integral and selected OAR doses. Beam-on times were 48.4 ± 9.2 (range: 34.1-66.7) seconds for the clinical plans. Time reductions were 9.2 ± 3.3 s (18.7 ± 5.8%), 11.6 ± 3.5 s (23.1 ± 5.9%), and 14.7 ± 3.9 s (28.9 ± 6.1%) when ELS was changed to 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, respectively, corresponding to 0.76-0.80 s/layer. SS change had a minimal effect (1.1 ± 1.6 s, or 1.9 ± 2.9%) on the beam-on time. Increasing the energy layers spacing can reduce the beam delivery time effectively without compromising IMPT plan quality; increasing the SS had no meaningful impact on beam delivery time and resulted in plan-quality degradation in some cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37101399
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13997
pmc: PMC10476974
doi:

Substances chimiques

Protons 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e13997

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):380-6
pubmed: 23462423
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 7;57(7):1779-95
pubmed: 22407290
Med Phys. 2000 Jun;27(6):1246-57
pubmed: 10902553
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jul 11;63(14):145006
pubmed: 29911658
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Jan;44(1):185-205
pubmed: 10071883
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jul 7;49(13):2853-80
pubmed: 15285252
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 7;59(21):6341-54
pubmed: 25295881
Phys Med Biol. 2020 May 11;65(9):095008
pubmed: 32155594
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):460-8
pubmed: 25823447
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jul;128(1):182-188
pubmed: 29459153
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Sep;24(9):e13997
pubmed: 37101399
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 7;61(23):8249-8265
pubmed: 27811403
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Dec 1;99(5):1121-1128
pubmed: 28964587
Med Phys. 2002 Nov;29(11):2584-9
pubmed: 12462725
Phys Med Biol. 2010 May 21;55(10):2863-78
pubmed: 20427853
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 15;69(4):1333-4; author reply 1334-5
pubmed: 17967323
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 7;54(1):N9-20
pubmed: 19075362
Br J Radiol. 2003 Oct;76(910):678-89
pubmed: 14512327

Auteurs

Mingyao Zhu (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Stella Flampouri (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Alex Stanforth (A)

Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Radiological Engineering & Medical Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Roelf Slopsema (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Zachary Diamond (Z)

Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Radiological Engineering & Medical Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

William LePain (W)

Mechanical Engineering, Nuclear Radiological Engineering & Medical Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Katja Langen (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH