Where do you stand?: an exploration of perspectives toward feet, foot health, and footwear using innovative digital methods.
Attitudes
Beliefs
Feet
Foot health
Prevention
Journal
Journal of foot and ankle research
ISSN: 1757-1146
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2023
28 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
06
12
2022
accepted:
10
04
2023
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
27
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The cost of losing foot health is significant to the person, healthcare systems, and economy, with diabetes related foot health issues alone costing over £1 billion annually in the UK. Yet many foot health problems are preventable through alternative health behaviour. It is therefore important to understand how feet, foot health and footwear are conceptualised to gain understanding about how these might influence foot health behaviour and inform health messages that seek to protect or improve foot health through altered health behaviour. This research seeks to explore attitudes and beliefs and identify phenomena that may act as barriers or motivators to the proactive self-management of foot health. Public conversations involving 2,699 expressions related to feet, footwear or foot health on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram were extracted. Conversations on Facebook and Twitter were scraped with NVivo's NCapture plugin whereby data is extracted and downloaded to NVivo. Extracted files were uploaded to the Big Content Machine (software developed at the University of Salford) which facilitated the search for keywords 'foot', 'feet', 'footwear', 'shoe', and 'shoes'. Instagram was scraped by hand. Data was analysed using a Thematic Analysis approach. Three themes were identified; 1) connections and disconnections derived from social and cultural constructs, 2) phenomena beyond attitudes and beliefs that relate to symbolic representations and the impact when foot health is lost, and 3) phenomena relating to Social Media as a conduit for the exploration of attitudes and beliefs. This novel research exemplifies complex and sometimes incongruous perspectives about feet including their value for what they facilitate, contrasted with negative feelings about the negative impact that can have aesthetically when feet work hard. Sometimes feet were devalued, with expressions of disgust, disconnection, and ridicule. The importance of contextual, social, and cultural phenomena with implications for optimising foot health messages. Knowledge gaps including factors related to children's foot health and development, and how to treat foot health problems. The power of communities with shared experience to influence decisions, theories, and behaviour about foot health was also revealed. While people do talk about feet in some social contexts, it is not always in a way that promotes overt, positive foot health behaviour. Finally, this research demonstrates the benefit of exploring perspectives in uncontrived settings and illuminates the potential utility of social media (SoMe) platforms Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter as vehicles to promote foot health self-management behaviour that is responsive to the social and demographic variances of engagers who inhabit those spaces.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The cost of losing foot health is significant to the person, healthcare systems, and economy, with diabetes related foot health issues alone costing over £1 billion annually in the UK. Yet many foot health problems are preventable through alternative health behaviour. It is therefore important to understand how feet, foot health and footwear are conceptualised to gain understanding about how these might influence foot health behaviour and inform health messages that seek to protect or improve foot health through altered health behaviour. This research seeks to explore attitudes and beliefs and identify phenomena that may act as barriers or motivators to the proactive self-management of foot health.
METHODS
METHODS
Public conversations involving 2,699 expressions related to feet, footwear or foot health on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram were extracted. Conversations on Facebook and Twitter were scraped with NVivo's NCapture plugin whereby data is extracted and downloaded to NVivo. Extracted files were uploaded to the Big Content Machine (software developed at the University of Salford) which facilitated the search for keywords 'foot', 'feet', 'footwear', 'shoe', and 'shoes'. Instagram was scraped by hand. Data was analysed using a Thematic Analysis approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three themes were identified; 1) connections and disconnections derived from social and cultural constructs, 2) phenomena beyond attitudes and beliefs that relate to symbolic representations and the impact when foot health is lost, and 3) phenomena relating to Social Media as a conduit for the exploration of attitudes and beliefs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This novel research exemplifies complex and sometimes incongruous perspectives about feet including their value for what they facilitate, contrasted with negative feelings about the negative impact that can have aesthetically when feet work hard. Sometimes feet were devalued, with expressions of disgust, disconnection, and ridicule. The importance of contextual, social, and cultural phenomena with implications for optimising foot health messages. Knowledge gaps including factors related to children's foot health and development, and how to treat foot health problems. The power of communities with shared experience to influence decisions, theories, and behaviour about foot health was also revealed. While people do talk about feet in some social contexts, it is not always in a way that promotes overt, positive foot health behaviour. Finally, this research demonstrates the benefit of exploring perspectives in uncontrived settings and illuminates the potential utility of social media (SoMe) platforms Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter as vehicles to promote foot health self-management behaviour that is responsive to the social and demographic variances of engagers who inhabit those spaces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37106384
doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00621-3
pii: 10.1186/s13047-023-00621-3
pmc: PMC10141949
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):183-210
pubmed: 30393976
J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Feb 10;14(1):12
pubmed: 33568218
J Diabetes Complications. 2018 Jul;32(7):665-669
pubmed: 29887299
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 09;10(1):586
pubmed: 29122000
J Healthc Manag. 2018 Jul-Aug;63(4):251-260
pubmed: 29985252
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Jun 14;11:30996
pubmed: 27307132
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):900-909
pubmed: 32219987
Br J Community Nurs. 2019 Mar 1;24(Sup3):S14-S19
pubmed: 30817189
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0248384
pubmed: 33705462
Int J Impot Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;19(4):432-7
pubmed: 17304204
BMC Psychol. 2019 Feb 20;7(1):7
pubmed: 30786921
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):130
pubmed: 30348165
Qual Health Res. 2020 Nov;30(13):2092-2102
pubmed: 32667257
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057
pubmed: 32148704
Diabet Med. 2019 Aug;36(8):995-1002
pubmed: 31004370
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Mar 02;6(5):1317-1325
pubmed: 34013110
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Apr;42(8):1107-1114
pubmed: 30621463
J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Aug 17;11:48
pubmed: 30140313
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9):
pubmed: 33622786
Maturitas. 2018 Dec;118:7-14
pubmed: 30415759
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Jun;38(6):1605-1613
pubmed: 30617439
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 18;24(1):e23656
pubmed: 35040796
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):427-440
pubmed: 28677332
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):829-836
pubmed: 33560583
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Feb 08;17:88-93
pubmed: 33680841
New Media Soc. 2018 May;20(5):1813-1831
pubmed: 30581358
Psychoanal Rev. 1985 Summer;72(2):301-14
pubmed: 2413495
J Child Health Care. 2020 Jun;24(2):221-232
pubmed: 31340659
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Mar 24;13(1):16
pubmed: 32209136