Evaluation of the yield, chemical composition and biological properties of essential oil from bioreactor-grown cultures of Salvia apiana microshoots.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2023
02 05 2023
Historique:
received:
20
10
2022
accepted:
21
04
2023
medline:
4
5
2023
pubmed:
3
5
2023
entrez:
2
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Microshoot cultures of the North American endemic Salvia apiana were established for the first time and evaluated for essential oil production. Stationary cultures, grown on Schenk-Hildebrandt (SH) medium, supplemented with 0.22 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ), 2.0 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine and 3.0% (w/v) sucrose, accumulated 1.27% (v/m dry weight) essential oil, consisting mostly of 1,8-cineole, β-pinene, α-pinene, β-myrcene and camphor. The microshoots were adapted to agitated culture, showing biomass yields up to ca. 19 g/L. Scale-up studies demonstrated that S. spiana microshoots grow well in temporary immersion systems (TIS). In the RITA bioreactor, up to 19.27 g/L dry biomass was obtained, containing 1.1% oil with up to ca. 42% cineole content. The other systems employed, i.e. Plantform (TIS) and a custom made spray bioreactor (SGB), yielded ca. 18 and 19 g/L dry weight, respectively. The essential oil content of Plantform and SGB-grown microshoots was comparable to RITA bioreactor, however, the content of cineole was substantially higher (ca. 55%). Oil samples isolated from in vitro material proved to be active in acetylcholinesterase (up to 60.0% inhibition recorded for Plantform-grown microshoots), as well as hyaluronidase and tyrosinase-inhibitory assays (up to 45.8 and 64.5% inhibition observed in the case of the SGB culture).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37130866
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33950-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-33950-1
pmc: PMC10154310
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oils, Volatile
0
Eucalyptol
RV6J6604TK
Acetylcholinesterase
EC 3.1.1.7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7141Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Prod Res. 2015 Feb;29(3):213-22
pubmed: 25104041
Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(4):2385-2485
pubmed: 35571983
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2014 Jun;20(6):485-95
pubmed: 24836739
Nat Prod Res. 2017 Sep;31(17):2058-2061
pubmed: 28025900
Biotechnol Lett. 2014 Feb;36(2):211-21
pubmed: 24129950
Molecules. 2020 Dec 10;25(24):
pubmed: 33321838
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Sep;89(1):26-32
pubmed: 24177765
Molecules. 2018 Aug 24;23(9):
pubmed: 30149540
Medicines (Basel). 2017 Jun 29;4(3):
pubmed: 28930262
Molecules. 2009 Apr 02;14(4):1438-47
pubmed: 19384275
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Feb;27(2):221-4
pubmed: 19854763
Biomolecules. 2020 Aug 28;10(9):
pubmed: 32872300
Food Chem. 2008 May 15;108(2):663-8
pubmed: 26059146
Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Nov;17(5):1105-9
pubmed: 1932684
J Biol Chem. 1956 May;220(1):303-6
pubmed: 13319348
Planta Med. 2022 Jul;88(8):604-627
pubmed: 33890254
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 May 27;57(10):4313-8
pubmed: 19358605
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003 Jun;75(3):661-8
pubmed: 12895684
J Tradit Complement Med. 2014 Apr;4(2):82-8
pubmed: 24860730
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;19(9):
pubmed: 30235891
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020 Feb 29;12:1179573520907397
pubmed: 32165850
Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Jul 25;8(8):
pubmed: 31349575
Drugs R D. 2017 Mar;17(1):53-64
pubmed: 27888449
J Biotechnol. 2017 Apr 10;247:11-17
pubmed: 28223005
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Oct;160:105054
pubmed: 32645358
Planta Med. 2019 Feb;85(3):239-248
pubmed: 30360002
Plants (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;9(6):
pubmed: 32604753
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;14(8):
pubmed: 34451844
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000 Jul;52(7):895-902
pubmed: 10933142
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Jan 21;63(2):447-56
pubmed: 25531412
S Afr J Bot. 2022 May;146:36-47
pubmed: 35210693
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2022 Dec;37(1):1120-1195
pubmed: 35470749
Curr Aging Sci. 2021;14(1):46-55
pubmed: 31393258
Mol Med Rep. 2015 Feb;11(2):1476-82
pubmed: 25352238