Evaluation of methods to assess the quality of cryopreserved Solanaceae pollen.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 05 2023
05 05 2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
accepted:
25
04
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
6
5
2023
entrez:
5
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Solanaceae pollen cryopreservation is a common practice in the hybrid seed production industry worldwide, enabling effective hybridization across geographical and seasonal limitations. As pollination with low quality pollen can result in significant seed yield loss, monitoring the pollen quality has become an important risk management tool. In this study, pollen quality analysis methods were evaluated for their suitability for routine quality control of cryopreserved pollen batches. The assessments, including pollen viability, pollen germinability and pollen vigor analysis, were conducted in two locations on a diverse set of cryopreserved tomato and pepper pollen batches. While the viability obtained by Impedance Flow Cytometry (IFC) can be interpreted as the pollen's potential to germinate, the in vitro germination assay directly quantifies this functionality under given assay conditions. A linear correlation was found between pollen viability obtained by IFC and in vitro germinability. In conclusion, IFC is the most suitable tool for applications and industries requiring a high degree of automation, throughput, repeatability, and reproducibility. In vitro germination assays are suitable for studies within certain temporal and geographic limitations, due to difficulties in standardization. On the other hand, vigor assessments are not sufficiently addressing the needs of the industry due to poor reproducibility and low throughput.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37147347
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34158-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-34158-z
pmc: PMC10163219
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7344Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167614
pubmed: 27936079
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165531
pubmed: 27832091
Plant Reprod. 2020 Dec;33(3-4):205-219
pubmed: 33123804
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2180:623-637
pubmed: 32797439
Am J Bot. 2002 Jun;89(6):1021-3
pubmed: 21665702
J Cell Sci. 1985 Feb;73:135-57
pubmed: 4019590
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 08;11:615922
pubmed: 33370424
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 18;9:1036
pubmed: 30073009
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1669:339-354
pubmed: 28936669
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7635-9
pubmed: 20404200
Protoplasma. 2006 Aug;228(1-3):73-7
pubmed: 16937057
Protoplasma. 2017 Jan;254(1):57-73
pubmed: 26872476
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36585
pubmed: 22615784
Cryo Letters. 2020 May-Jun;41(3):115-127
pubmed: 33988640
Protoplasma. 2001;216(3-4):171-80
pubmed: 11732185
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):365-74
pubmed: 26980838
Plants (Basel). 2013 Jul 11;2(3):489-506
pubmed: 27137389