Mitotic clustering of pulverized chromosomes from micronuclei.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
19
07
2022
accepted:
17
03
2023
medline:
30
6
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Complex genome rearrangements can be generated by the catastrophic pulverization of missegregated chromosomes trapped within micronuclei through a process known as chromothripsis
Identifiants
pubmed: 37165191
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05974-0
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-05974-0
pmc: PMC10307639
doi:
Substances chimiques
CIP2A protein, human
0
DNA
9007-49-2
TOPBP1 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1041-1048Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : RM1 GM145399
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM146610
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R00 CA218871
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA124334
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).
pubmed: 21215367
pmcid: 3065307
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055
Zhang, C. Z. et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015).
pubmed: 26017310
pmcid: 4742237
doi: 10.1038/nature14493
Ly, P. et al. Chromosome segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 51, 705–715 (2019).
pubmed: 30833795
pmcid: 6441390
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0360-8
Umbreit, N. T. et al. Mechanisms generating cancer genome complexity from a single cell division error. Science 368, eaba0712 (2020).
Kneissig, M. et al. Micronuclei-based model system reveals functional consequences of chromothripsis in human cells. eLife 8, e50292 (2019).
Ly, P. & Cleveland, D. W. Rebuilding chromosomes after catastrophe: emerging mechanisms of chromothripsis. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 917–930 (2017).
pubmed: 28899600
pmcid: 5696049
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.08.005
Rausch, T. et al. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 148, 59–71 (2012).
pubmed: 22265402
pmcid: 3332216
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.013
Cortes-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).
pubmed: 32025003
pmcid: 7058534
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0576-7
The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6
Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Hetzer, M. W. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell 154, 47–60 (2013).
pubmed: 23827674
pmcid: 3749778
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.007
Tang, S., Stokasimov, E., Cui, Y., & Pellman, D. Breakage of cytoplasmic chromosomes by pathological DNA base excision repair. Nature 606, 930–936 (2022).
Vietri, M. et al. Unrestrained ESCRT-III drives micronuclear catastrophe and chromosome fragmentation. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 856–867 (2020).
pubmed: 32601372
doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0537-5
Crasta, K. et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482, 53–58 (2012).
pubmed: 22258507
pmcid: 3271137
doi: 10.1038/nature10802
Ly, P. et al. Selective Y centromere inactivation triggers chromosome shattering in micronuclei and repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 68–75 (2017).
pubmed: 27918550
doi: 10.1038/ncb3450
Chiang, C. et al. Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat. Genet. 44, 390–397 (2012).
pubmed: 22388000
pmcid: 3340016
doi: 10.1038/ng.2202
Kloosterman, W. P. & Cuppen, E. Chromothripsis in congenital disorders and cancer: similarities and differences. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 341–348 (2013).
pubmed: 23478216
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.008
Ling, Y. H., Lin, Z. & Yuen, K. W. Y. Genetic and epigenetic effects on centromere establishment. Chromosoma 129, 1–24 (2020).
pubmed: 31781852
doi: 10.1007/s00412-019-00727-3
Royou, A., Gagou, M. E., Karess, R. & Sullivan, W. BubR1- and Polo-coated DNA tethers facilitate poleward segregation of acentric chromatids. Cell 140, 235–245 (2010).
pubmed: 20141837
pmcid: 2969851
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.043
Kanda, T., Otter, M. & Wahl, G. M. Mitotic segregation of viral and cellular acentric extrachromosomal molecules by chromosome tethering. J. Cell Sci. 114, 49–58 (2001).
pubmed: 11112689
doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.1.49
Aydin, I. & Schelhaas, M. Viral genome tethering to host cell chromatin: cause and consequences. Traffic 17, 327–340 (2016).
pubmed: 26787361
doi: 10.1111/tra.12378
De Leo, A., Calderon, A. & Lieberman, P. M. Control of viral latency by episome maintenance proteins. Trends Microbiol. 28, 150–162 (2020).
pubmed: 31624007
doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.09.002
Orr, B. et al. An anaphase surveillance mechanism prevents micronuclei formation from frequent chromosome segregation errors. Cell Rep. 37, 109783 (2021).
pubmed: 34758324
pmcid: 8595644
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109783
Fachinetti, D. et al. DNA sequence-specific binding of CENP-B enhances the fidelity of human centromere function. Dev. Cell 33, 314–327 (2015).
pubmed: 25942623
pmcid: 4421092
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.020
Tanenbaum, M. E., Gilbert, L. A., Qi, L. S., Weissman, J. S. & Vale, R. D. A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159, 635–646 (2014).
pubmed: 25307933
pmcid: 4252608
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039
Nakahori, Y., Mitani, K., Yamada, M. & Nakagome, Y. A human Y-chromosome specific repeated DNA family (DYZ1) consists of a tandem array of pentanucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 7569–7580 (1986).
pubmed: 3774538
pmcid: 311781
doi: 10.1093/nar/14.19.7569
Papathanasiou, S. et al. Transgenerational transcriptional heterogeneity from cytoplasmic chromatin. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.12.475869 (2022).
Clay, D. E., Bretscher, H. S., Jezuit, E. A., Bush, K. B. & Fox, D. T. Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202106116 (2021).
Adam, S. et al. The CIP2A–TOPBP1 axis safeguards chromosome stability and is a synthetic lethal target for BRCA-mutated cancer. Nat. Cancer 2, 1357–1371 (2021).
pubmed: 35121901
doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00266-w
Leimbacher, P. A. et al. MDC1 interacts with TOPBP1 to maintain chromosomal stability during mitosis. Mol. Cell 74, 571–583 (2019).
pubmed: 30898438
pmcid: 6509287
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.014
De Marco Zompit, M. et al. The CIP2A–TOPBP1 complex safeguards chromosomal stability during mitosis. Nat. Commun. 13, 4143 (2022).
pubmed: 35842428
pmcid: 9288427
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31865-5
Laine, A. et al. CIP2A interacts with TopBP1 and drives basal-like breast cancer tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 81, 4319–4331 (2021).
pubmed: 34145035
pmcid: 8373817
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3651
Nabet, B. et al. Rapid and direct control of target protein levels with VHL-recruiting dTAG molecules. Nat. Commun. 11, 4687 (2020).
pubmed: 32948771
pmcid: 7501296
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18377-w
Worrall, J. T. et al. Non-random mis-segregation of human chromosomes. Cell Rep. 23, 3366–3380 (2018).
pubmed: 29898405
pmcid: 6019738
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.047
Leibowitz, M. L. et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Genet. 53, 895–905 (2021).
pubmed: 33846636
pmcid: 8192433
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7
Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017).
pubmed: 28738408
pmcid: 5870830
doi: 10.1038/nature23449
Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017).
pubmed: 28759889
pmcid: 5857357
doi: 10.1038/nature23470
Heijink, A. M. et al. Sister chromatid exchanges induced by perturbed replication can form independently of BRCA1, BRCA2 and RAD51. Nat. Commun. 13, 6722 (2022).
Stewart, G. S., Wang, B., Bignell, C. R., Taylor, A. M. & Elledge, S. J. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421, 961–966 (2003).
pubmed: 12607005
doi: 10.1038/nature01446
Stucki, M. et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123, 1213–1226 (2005).
pubmed: 16377563
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.038
Pedersen, R. T., Kruse, T., Nilsson, J., Oestergaard, V. H. & Lisby, M. TopBP1 is required at mitosis to reduce transmission of DNA damage to G1 daughter cells. J. Cell Biol. 210, 565–582 (2015).
pubmed: 26283799
pmcid: 4539992
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201502107
Shoshani, O. et al. Chromothripsis drives the evolution of gene amplification in cancer. Nature 591, 137–141 (2021).
pubmed: 33361815
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03064-z
Bakhoum, S. F. et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature 553, 467–472 (2018).
pubmed: 29342134
pmcid: 5785464
doi: 10.1038/nature25432
Samwer, M. et al. DNA cross-bridging shapes a single nucleus from a set of mitotic chromosomes. Cell 170, 956–972 (2017).
pubmed: 28841419
pmcid: 5638020
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.038
Korbel, J. O. & Campbell, P. J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226–1236 (2013).
pubmed: 23498933
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.023
Collins, R. L. et al. Defining the diverse spectrum of inversions, complex structural variation, and chromothripsis in the morbid human genome. Genome Biol. 18, 36 (2017).
pubmed: 28260531
pmcid: 5338099
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1158-6
Kloosterman, W. P. et al. Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20, 1916–1924 (2011).
pubmed: 21349919
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr073
Lee, J. J. et al. Tracing oncogene rearrangements in the mutational history of lung adenocarcinoma. Cell 177, 1842–1857 e1821 (2019).
pubmed: 31155235
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.013
Bao, L., Zhong, X., Yang, Y. et al. Starfish infers signatures of complex genomic rearrangements across human cancers. Nat. Cancer 3, 1247–1259 (2022).
Frattini, C. et al. TopBP1 assembles nuclear condensates to switch on ATR signaling. Mol. Cell 81, 1231–1245 (2021).
pubmed: 33503405
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.049
Roukos, V. et al. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science 341, 660–664 (2013).
pubmed: 23929981
pmcid: 6324928
doi: 10.1126/science.1237150
Lin, Y.-F., Hu, Q., Guyer, A., Fachinetti, D. & Ly, P. Induction of chromosome-specific micronuclei and chromothripsis by centromere inactivation. Methods Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2022.10.009 (2022).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
pubmed: 25260700
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
Frankish, A. et al. Gencode 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D916–D923 (2021).
pubmed: 33270111
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1087
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
pubmed: 16199517
pmcid: 1239896
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Liberzon, A. et al. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).
pubmed: 26771021
pmcid: 4707969
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004
Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666–677 (2013).
pubmed: 23622249
pmcid: 3690918
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.021
Espejo Valle-Inclán, J. & Cortés-Ciriano, I. ReConPlot – an R package for the visualization and interpretation of genomic rearrangements. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.24.529890 (2023).
Cunningham, F. et al. Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D988–D995 (2022).
pubmed: 34791404
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1049
Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. & Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1184–1191 (2009).
pubmed: 19617889
pmcid: 3159387
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.97
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278
pmcid: 2832824
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033