Grip strength differences in middle-aged and older adults and individuals with stroke.
Journal
European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1973-9095
Titre abrégé: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101465662
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
medline:
13
6
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
11
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How the natural deterioration of aging, sex difference, and pathological effect of stroke affect the prediction of hand strength is still unknown. This study aimed to compare and predict grip strength in both hands between normal controls (NCs) and stroke patients. Observational, cross-sectional study. Two urban hospitals and the community. A total of 160 participants aged from 40 to 80 (80 NCs and stroke patients) were recruited. The Jamar The linear regression models of the grip strength in both right and left hands were good fits (the adjusted R The pathological, sex, and age effects play complementary roles in predicting the grip strength in middle-aged and older adults between NCs and stroke patients. In clinical practice, the recovery of the grip strength in stroke patients should take pathological, sex, and age effects together with the right dominant or left non-dominant hand affected into consideration, rather than merely comparing the differences in the grip strength of both right and left hands as a reference.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
How the natural deterioration of aging, sex difference, and pathological effect of stroke affect the prediction of hand strength is still unknown.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare and predict grip strength in both hands between normal controls (NCs) and stroke patients.
DESIGN
METHODS
Observational, cross-sectional study.
SETTING
METHODS
Two urban hospitals and the community.
POPULATION
METHODS
A total of 160 participants aged from 40 to 80 (80 NCs and stroke patients) were recruited.
METHODS
METHODS
The Jamar
RESULTS
RESULTS
The linear regression models of the grip strength in both right and left hands were good fits (the adjusted R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The pathological, sex, and age effects play complementary roles in predicting the grip strength in middle-aged and older adults between NCs and stroke patients.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT
CONCLUSIONS
In clinical practice, the recovery of the grip strength in stroke patients should take pathological, sex, and age effects together with the right dominant or left non-dominant hand affected into consideration, rather than merely comparing the differences in the grip strength of both right and left hands as a reference.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37166433
pii: S1973-9087.23.07729-8
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07729-8
pmc: PMC10266408
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
294-302Références
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 30;16(1):201
pubmed: 27903239
PM R. 2011 May;3(5):472-9
pubmed: 21570036
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88225
pubmed: 24520356
Singapore Med J. 2002 May;43(5):234-7
pubmed: 12188074
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Dec;23(12):1651-1660
pubmed: 30350714
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Jun;13(6):581-98
pubmed: 16796582
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
pubmed: 1135616
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1793-1799
pubmed: 29184290
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Apr 14;4:127
pubmed: 21492469
Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):409-15
pubmed: 16690636
Am J Occup Ther. 1989 Jul;43(7):444-7
pubmed: 2750859
J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 May;25(5):611-4
pubmed: 24259813
BMJ. 2010 Sep 09;341:c4467
pubmed: 20829298
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Oct;27(8):732-41
pubmed: 23774125
Sci Rep. 2021 May 11;11(1):9950
pubmed: 33976319
Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7
pubmed: 3809245
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Sep;29(9):105017
pubmed: 32807432
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Aug;43(8):1113-22
pubmed: 25927041
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Jun;19(4):404-11
pubmed: 15929509
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Feb;66(2):69-74
pubmed: 3970660
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 13;10:442
pubmed: 27679565
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan-Feb;54(1):21-7
pubmed: 21371760
Brain. 1989 Jun;112 ( Pt 3):749-63
pubmed: 2731028
Age (Dordr). 2013 Jun;35(3):929-41
pubmed: 22314403
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1995 Jun;5(3):129-42
pubmed: 7552755
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):737-44
pubmed: 18645189
J Nutr. 1997 May;127(5 Suppl):1004S-1006S
pubmed: 9164284
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):811-5
pubmed: 18947819
Physiother Can. 2004 Aug;56(4):189-201
pubmed: 23255839
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2173-80
pubmed: 12920254
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):83-9
pubmed: 20039588
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Dec;23(6):400-405
pubmed: 27145212