Comparisons of in-hospital complications between total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty
In-hospital complications
Nationwide inpatient sample database
Osteoarthritis
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 May 2023
11 May 2023
Historique:
received:
10
10
2022
accepted:
03
05
2023
medline:
15
5
2023
pubmed:
12
5
2023
entrez:
11
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a less common but effective alternative method to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip reconstruction. In this study, we investigated the incidences of in-hospital complications between patients who had been subjected to THA and HRA. The National Inpatient Sample data that had been recorded from 2005 to 2014 was used in this study. Based on the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, patients who underwent THA or HRA were included. Data on demographics, preoperative comorbidities, length of hospital stay, total charges, and in-hospital mortality and complications were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether different surgical options are independent risk factors for postoperative complications. A total of 537,506 THAs and 9,744 HRAs were obtained from the NIS database. Patients who had been subjected to HRA exhibited less preoperative comorbidity rates, shorter length of stay and extra hospital charges. Moreover, HRA was associated with more in-hospital prosthesis loosening. Notably, patients who underwent HRA were younger and presented less preoperative comorbidities but did not show lower incidences in most complications. The popularity of HRA gradually reduced from the year 2005 to 2014. Patients who underwent HRA were more likely to be younger, male, have less comorbidities and spend more money on medical costs. The risk of in-hospital prosthesis loosening after HRA was higher. The HRA-associated advantages with regards to most in-hospital complications were not markedly different from those of THA. In-hospital complications of HRA deserve more attention from surgeons.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a less common but effective alternative method to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip reconstruction. In this study, we investigated the incidences of in-hospital complications between patients who had been subjected to THA and HRA.
METHODS
METHODS
The National Inpatient Sample data that had been recorded from 2005 to 2014 was used in this study. Based on the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, patients who underwent THA or HRA were included. Data on demographics, preoperative comorbidities, length of hospital stay, total charges, and in-hospital mortality and complications were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether different surgical options are independent risk factors for postoperative complications.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 537,506 THAs and 9,744 HRAs were obtained from the NIS database. Patients who had been subjected to HRA exhibited less preoperative comorbidity rates, shorter length of stay and extra hospital charges. Moreover, HRA was associated with more in-hospital prosthesis loosening. Notably, patients who underwent HRA were younger and presented less preoperative comorbidities but did not show lower incidences in most complications.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The popularity of HRA gradually reduced from the year 2005 to 2014. Patients who underwent HRA were more likely to be younger, male, have less comorbidities and spend more money on medical costs. The risk of in-hospital prosthesis loosening after HRA was higher. The HRA-associated advantages with regards to most in-hospital complications were not markedly different from those of THA. In-hospital complications of HRA deserve more attention from surgeons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37170240
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06487-7
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06487-7
pmc: PMC10173641
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
375Subventions
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : 2021A1515011628
Organisme : Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou
ID : 202102020957
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Orthopedics. 2010 Sep;33(9 Suppl):11-3
pubmed: 20839716
Hip Int. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):195-202
pubmed: 22547372
Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Apr;36(2):187-93, ix
pubmed: 15833456
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Mar;86(2):177-84
pubmed: 15046429
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88 Suppl 3:90-7
pubmed: 17079373
BMJ. 2013 Nov 27;347:f6549
pubmed: 24284336
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;12(5):314-21
pubmed: 15469226
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):637-54
pubmed: 18310716
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):201-5
pubmed: 22528384
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jul;90(7):847-51
pubmed: 18591590
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1320-1329
pubmed: 30295530
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Mar;9(1):84-92
pubmed: 26830851
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671
pubmed: 30496081
BMJ. 2012 Oct 03;345:e6688
pubmed: 23034862
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2323-2327
pubmed: 29455347
Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):27-34
pubmed: 21647734
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15513
pubmed: 31045842
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3200-3208
pubmed: 33992480
Surg Technol Int. 2014 Mar;24:326-32
pubmed: 24347481
Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):2031-6
pubmed: 25708400
Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):231-7
pubmed: 21079954
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):675-678
pubmed: 28552834
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 May 06;9(5):23259671211003521
pubmed: 33997077
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):108-12
pubmed: 19583535
Hip Int. 2014 Oct 02;24 Suppl 10:S19-24
pubmed: 24970031
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3770-8
pubmed: 25981716
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):167-70
pubmed: 15736736
Hip Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):330-8
pubmed: 26109156
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636
pubmed: 32898048
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1879-1887
pubmed: 30399083
BMJ. 2012 Feb 28;344:e1349
pubmed: 22374740
BMJ. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3319
pubmed: 22700782
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2521-9
pubmed: 25758375
Int Orthop. 2021 Dec;45(12):3075-3081
pubmed: 34155524
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1055-1059
pubmed: 33183915
J Orthop. 2020 Dec 31;23:123-127
pubmed: 33488008
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1759-66
pubmed: 23036895