Development of a deep learning-based error detection system without error dose maps in the patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
VAE
deep learning
patient-specific QA
radiotherapy
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jul 2023
18 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
25
11
2022
revised:
15
02
2022
medline:
21
7
2023
pubmed:
13
5
2023
entrez:
13
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To detect errors in patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), we proposed an error detection method based on dose distribution analysis using unsupervised deep learning approach and analyzed 161 prostate VMAT beams measured with a cylindrical detector. For performing error simulation, in addition to error-free dose distribution, dose distributions containing nine types of error, including multileaf collimator (MLC) positional errors, gantry rotation errors, radiation output errors and phantom setup errors, were generated. Only error-free data were employed for the model training, and error-free and error data were employed for the tests. As a deep learning model, the variational autoencoder (VAE) was adopted. The anomaly of test data was quantified by calculating Mahalanobis distance based on the feature vectors acquired from a trained encoder. Based on this anomaly, test data were classified as 'error-free' or 'any-error.' For comparison with conventional approaches, gamma (γ)-analysis was performed, and supervised learning convolutional neural network (S-CNN) was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to evaluate their performance with the area under the curve (AUC). For all error types, except systematic MLC positional and radiation output errors, the performance of the methods was in the order of S-CNN ˃ VAE-based ˃ γ-analysis (only S-CNN required error data for model training). For example, in random MLC positional error simulation, the AUC of our method, S-CNN and γ-analysis were 0.699, 0.921 and 0.669, respectively. Our results showed that the VAE-based method has the potential to detect errors in patient-specific VMAT QA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37177789
pii: 7160591
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad028
pmc: PMC10354858
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
728-737Subventions
Organisme : Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research in Japan
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5359-73
pubmed: 19994544
Med Phys. 2003 Aug;30(8):2089-115
pubmed: 12945975
Med Phys. 2020 Oct;47(10):4711-4720
pubmed: 33460182
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1195-201
pubmed: 25442044
Phys Med. 2016 Jul;32(7):866-73
pubmed: 27262921
Phys Med Biol. 2009 May 7;54(9):N167-76
pubmed: 19384007
Med Phys. 1998 May;25(5):656-61
pubmed: 9608475
Med Phys. 2021 Mar;48(3):991-1002
pubmed: 33382467
Phys Med. 2020 May;73:57-64
pubmed: 32330812
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Feb 05;10(1):120-128
pubmed: 19223841
Phys Med. 2017 Jun;38:122-139
pubmed: 28595812
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 03;5:4006
pubmed: 24892406
Phys Med. 2016 Jan;32(1):169-75
pubmed: 26626610
Phys Med. 2018 Oct;54:137-145
pubmed: 30337003
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):456-464
pubmed: 30548601
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:243-249
pubmed: 33011206
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83
pubmed: 29443390
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 7;61(13):R150-66
pubmed: 27269645
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):219-228
pubmed: 30102197
Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):1037-44
pubmed: 21452741
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-6
pubmed: 22257792
Med Phys. 2021 Jan;48(1):80-93
pubmed: 33128263
Med Phys. 2010 Jun;37(6):2516-24
pubmed: 20632563
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):4769-4783
pubmed: 34101848