Salivary E-cadherin as a biomarker for diagnosis and predicting grade of periodontitis.


Journal

Journal of periodontal research
ISSN: 1600-0765
Titre abrégé: J Periodontal Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0055107

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised: 14 03 2023
received: 06 10 2022
accepted: 28 03 2023
medline: 6 7 2023
pubmed: 15 5 2023
entrez: 15 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the abilities of salivary E-cadherin to differentiate between periodontal health and periodontitis and to discriminate grades of periodontitis. E-cadherin is the main protein responsible for maintaining the integrity of epithelial-barrier function. Disintegration of this protein is one of the events associated with the destructive forms of periodontal disease leading to increase concentration of E-cadherin in the oral biofluids. A total of 63 patients with periodontitis (case) and 35 periodontally healthy subjects (control) were included. For each patient, periodontal parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Concentration of salivary E-cadherin was determined by ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to determine the diagnostic potentials of E-cadherin. Level of salivary E-cadherin was significantly higher in periodontitis cases than controls. The ROC analysis showed that salivary E-cadherin exhibits excellent sensitivity and specificity (AUC 1.000) to differentiate periodontal health from periodontitis with a cutoff concentration equal to 1.325 ng/mL. The AUCs of E-cadherin to differentiate grade A from grade B and C periodontitis were 0.731 (cutoff point = 1.754 ng/mL) and 0.746 (cutoff point = 1.722 ng/mL), respectively. However, the AUC of salivary E-cadherin to differentiate grade B from grade C periodontitis was lower (0.541). Additionally, BOP and PPD were significantly and positively correlated with the concentration of salivary E-cadherin. Salivary E-cadherin exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity to differentiate periodontitis from a healthy periodontium. The level of accuracy of E-cadherin was also sufficient to recognize grade A periodontitis from grade B and C periodontitis.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To determine the abilities of salivary E-cadherin to differentiate between periodontal health and periodontitis and to discriminate grades of periodontitis.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
E-cadherin is the main protein responsible for maintaining the integrity of epithelial-barrier function. Disintegration of this protein is one of the events associated with the destructive forms of periodontal disease leading to increase concentration of E-cadherin in the oral biofluids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A total of 63 patients with periodontitis (case) and 35 periodontally healthy subjects (control) were included. For each patient, periodontal parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. Concentration of salivary E-cadherin was determined by ELISA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to determine the diagnostic potentials of E-cadherin.
RESULTS RESULTS
Level of salivary E-cadherin was significantly higher in periodontitis cases than controls. The ROC analysis showed that salivary E-cadherin exhibits excellent sensitivity and specificity (AUC 1.000) to differentiate periodontal health from periodontitis with a cutoff concentration equal to 1.325 ng/mL. The AUCs of E-cadherin to differentiate grade A from grade B and C periodontitis were 0.731 (cutoff point = 1.754 ng/mL) and 0.746 (cutoff point = 1.722 ng/mL), respectively. However, the AUC of salivary E-cadherin to differentiate grade B from grade C periodontitis was lower (0.541). Additionally, BOP and PPD were significantly and positively correlated with the concentration of salivary E-cadherin.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Salivary E-cadherin exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity to differentiate periodontitis from a healthy periodontium. The level of accuracy of E-cadherin was also sufficient to recognize grade A periodontitis from grade B and C periodontitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37186464
doi: 10.1111/jre.13125
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Cadherins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

715-722

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Savage A, Eaton KA, Moles DR, Needleman I. A systematic review of definitions of periodontitis and methods that have been used to identify this disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(6):458-467.
Devaraj C, Eswar P. Reasons for use and non-use of dental services among people visiting a dental college hospital in India: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(4):422-427.
Abdulkareem AA, Abdulbaqi HR, Alshami ML, Al-Rawi NH. Oral health awareness, attitude towards dental treatment, fear of infection and economic impact during COVID-19 pandemic in the Middle East. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021;19(3):295-304.
Ansai T, Awano S, Soh I. Problems and future approaches for assessment of periodontal disease. Front Public Health. 2014;2:54.
Gupta N, Rath SK, Lohra P. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of periodontal probing depth and attachment levels using a Florida probe versus traditional probes. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(4):352-358.
Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(S20):S149-S161.
Checchi L, Montevecchi M, Checchi V, Zappulla F. The relationship between bleeding on probing and subgingival deposits. An endoscopical evaluation. Open Dent J. 2009;3:154-160.
Buduneli N, Kinane DF. Host-derived diagnostic markers related to soft tissue destruction and bone degradation in periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(Suppl 11):85-105.
Gupta S, Chhina S, Arora SA. A systematic review of biomarkers of gingival crevicular fluid: their predictive role in diagnosis of periodontal disease status. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(2):98-104.
Kc S, Wang XZ, Gallagher JE. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of host-derived salivary biomarkers in periodontal disease amongst adults: systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(3):289-308.
Nanakaly HT. Interleukine-6 level in saliva of patients with chronic periodontitis: a case-control study. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2016;28(1):103-108.
Sorsa T, Alassiri S, Grigoriadis A, et al. Active MMP-8 (aMMP-8) as a grading and staging biomarker in the periodontitis classification. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(2):61.
Baeza M, Garrido M, Hernández-Ríos P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for apical and chronic periodontitis biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid: an exploratory study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(1):34-45.
Gul SS, Zardawi FM, Abdulkareem AA, Shaikh MS, Al-Rawi NH, Zafar MS. Efficacy of MMP-8 level in gingival crevicular fluid to predict the outcome of nonsurgical periodontal treatment: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):3131.
Atarchi AR. Potential of salivary matrix metalloproteinase 9 to discriminate periodontal health and disease. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2022;34(2):74-79.
Rautava J, Gürsoy UK, Kullström A, et al. An oral rinse active matrix metalloproteinase-8 point-of-care immunotest may Be less accurate in patients with Crohn's disease. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):395.
Nanakaly HT, Ismail AE, Othmn DA. Influence of smoking on salivary interleukin-8 levels in chronic periodontitis. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2020;32(1):28-34.
Salim IK, Diajil AR. Assessment of salivary immunoglobulin A, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis and on conservative treatment. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2022;34(2):62-73.
Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science. 1991;251(5000):1451-1455.
Ye P, Chapple CC, Kumar RK, Hunter N. Expression patterns of E-cadherin, involucrin, and connexin gap junction proteins in the lining epithelia of inflamed gingiva. J Pathol. 2000;192(1):58-66.
Fujita T, Yoshimoto T, Kajiya M, et al. Regulation of defensive function on gingival epithelial cells can prevent periodontal disease. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018;54(2):66-75.
Saliem SS, Bede SY, Cooper PR, Abdulkareem AA, Milward MR, Abdullah BH. Pathogenesis of periodontitis - a potential role for epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:268-278.
Tâlvan E-T, Mohor CI, Chisnoiu D, et al. Correlation of chronic periodontitis progression with sTREM-1 and E-Cadherin salivary levels. Rev Romana de Medicina de Lab. 2018;26(3):373-376.
Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S74-s84.
Topkas E, Keith P, Dimeski G, Cooper-White J, Punyadeera C. Evaluation of saliva collection devices for the analysis of proteins. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(13-14):1066-1070.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-126.
Kinney JS, Morelli T, Braun T, et al. Saliva/pathogen biomarker signatures and periodontal disease progression. J Dent Res. 2011;90(6):752-758.
Haririan H, Andrukhov O, Laky M, Rausch-Fan X. Saliva as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis and periimplantitis. Front Dent Med. 2021;2:687638.
Zhang Y, Kang N, Xue F, et al. Evaluation of salivary biomarkers for the diagnosis of periodontitis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):266.
Abdulkareem AA, Shelton RM, Landini G, Cooper PR, Milward MR. Potential role of periodontal pathogens in compromising epithelial barrier function by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Periodontal Res. 2018;53(4):565-574.
Chen W, Alshaikh A, Kim S, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis impairs Oral epithelial barrier through targeting GRHL2. J Dent Res. 2019;98(10):1150-1158.
Hiyoshi T, Domon H, Maekawa T, et al. Neutrophil elastase aggravates periodontitis by disrupting gingival epithelial barrier via cleaving cell adhesion molecules. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8159.
Hartsock A, Nelson WJ. Adherens and tight junctions: structure, function and connections to the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):660-669.
Zhu L, Yao Y, Liu J, Wang J, Xie H. Expression of β-catenin and MMP-8 in gingival crevicular fluid and gingival tissue indicates the disease severity of patients with chronic periodontitis. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(3):2131-2139.
Katz J, Sambandam V, Wu JH, Michalek SM, Balkovetz DF. Characterization of Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced degradation of epithelial cell junctional complexes. Infect Immun. 2000;68(3):1441-1449.
He J, Da L, Pan Y, et al. Association between quantitative analyses of periodontal pathogens and the depth of periodontal pockets. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020;34(1):515-521.
Sume SS, Kantarci A, Lee A, Hasturk H, Trackman PC. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in gingival overgrowth. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(1):208-218.
Ma X, Ge A, Han J, et al. Meta-analysis of downregulated E-cadherin as a diagnostic biomarker for cervical cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;307:331-341.
Jiang H, Guan G, Zhang R, et al. Identification of urinary soluble E-cadherin as a novel biomarker for diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25(3):232-241.
Koziolek M, Mueller GA, Dihazi GH, et al. Urine E-cadherin: a marker for early detection of kidney injury in diabetic patients. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):639.
von Zeidler SV, de Souza BT, Mendonça EF, Batista AC. E-cadherin as a potential biomarker of malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:972.
Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal diagnosis in treated periodontitis. Why, when and how to use clinical parameters. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(3 Pt 2):240-250.
Almståhl A, Wikström M. Oral microflora in subjects with reduced salivary secretion. J Dent Res. 1999;78(8):1410-1416.
Vallabhan CG, Sivarajan S, Shivkumar AD, Narayanan V, Vijayakumar S, Indhuja RS. Assessment of salivary flow rate in patients with chronic periodontitis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S308-s312.
Tranfić Duplančić M, Pecotić R, Lušić Kalcina L, et al. Salivary parameters and periodontal inflammation in obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19387.
Lăzureanu PC, Popescu F, Tudor A, Stef L, Negru AG, Mihăilă R. Saliva pH and flow rate in patients with periodontal disease and associated cardiovascular disease. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e931362.
Gill SK, Price M, Costa RJ. Measurement of saliva flow rate in healthy young humans: influence of collection time and mouthrinse water temperature. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(5):447-453.
Blomlöf J, Jansson L, Blomlöf L, Lindskog S. Root surface etching at neutral pH promotes periodontal healing. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23(1):50-55.
Schultze LB, Maldonado A, Lussi A, Sculean A, Eick S. The impact of the pH value on biofilm formation. Monogr Oral Sci. 2021;29:19-29.
Yao H, Hou C, Liu W, Yi J, Su W, Hou Q. Associations of multiple serum biomarkers and the risk of cardiovascular disease in China. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):426.
Grant MM, Taylor JJ, Jaedicke K, et al. Discovery, validation, and diagnostic ability of multiple protein-based biomarkers in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid to distinguish between health and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2022;49(7):622-632.
Mohammed HA, Abdulkareem AA, Zardawi FM, Gul SS. Determination of the accuracy of salivary biomarkers for periodontal diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(10):2485.
Ebersole JL, Nagarajan R, Akers D, Miller CS. Targeted salivary biomarkers for discrimination of periodontal health and disease(s). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:62.
Hedenbjörk-Lager A, Bjørndal L, Gustafsson A, et al. Caries correlates strongly to salivary levels of matrix metalloproteinase-8. Caries Res. 2015;49(1):1-8.
Heikkinen AM, Sorsa T, Pitkäniemi J, et al. Smoking affects diagnostic salivary periodontal disease biomarker levels in adolescents. J Periodontol. 2010;81(9):1299-1307.
Golub LM, Elburki MS, Walker C, et al. Non-antibacterial tetracycline formulations: host-modulators in the treatment of periodontitis and relevant systemic diseases. Int Dent J. 2016;66(3):127-135.
Nwhator SO, Ayanbadejo PO, Umeizudike KA, et al. Clinical correlates of a lateral-flow immunoassay oral risk indicator. J Periodontol. 2014;85(1):188-194.

Auteurs

Nadia M Kazem (NM)

Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Ali A Abdulkareem (AA)

Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Michael R Milward (MR)

School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH