Differential contribution of between and within-brain coupling to movement synchronization.
hyperscanning
interbrain coupling
movement synchronization
Journal
Human brain mapping
ISSN: 1097-0193
Titre abrégé: Hum Brain Mapp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9419065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
revised:
07
04
2023
received:
10
01
2023
accepted:
25
04
2023
medline:
13
6
2023
pubmed:
17
5
2023
entrez:
17
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A fundamental characteristic of the human brain that supports behavior is its capacity to create connections between brain regions. A promising approach holds that during social behavior, brain regions not only create connections with other brain regions within a brain, but also coordinate their activity with other brain regions of an interaction partner. Here we ask whether between-brain and within-brain coupling contribute differentially to movement synchronization. We focused on coupling between the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a brain region associated with the observation-execution system, and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a region associated with error-monitoring and prediction. Participants, randomly divided into dyads, were simultaneously scanned with functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS) while performing an open-ended 3D hand movement task consisting of three conditions: back-to-back movement, free movement, or intentional synchronization. Results show that behavioral synchrony was higher in the intentional synchrony compared with the back-to-back and free movement conditions. Between-brain coupling in the IFG and dmPFC was evident in the free movement and intentional synchrony conditions but not in the back-to-back condition. Importantly, between-brain coupling was found to positively predict intentional synchrony, while within-brain coupling was found to predict synchronization during free movement. These results indicate that during intentional synchronization, brain organization changes such that between-brain networks, but not within-brain connections, contribute to successful communication, pointing to shift from a within-brain feedback loop to a two-brains feedback loop.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37195028
doi: 10.1002/hbm.26335
pmc: PMC10258530
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4136-4151Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul;16(7):430-9
pubmed: 26081790
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Jun;79(3):284-95
pubmed: 21639608
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2430-7
pubmed: 21933717
Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 26;277:842-58
pubmed: 25088911
J Biomed Opt. 2007 Nov-Dec;12(6):062106
pubmed: 18163809
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24893
pubmed: 21957466
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;54(4):530-541
pubmed: 30957565
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):817-8
pubmed: 17529986
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;23(3):174-186
pubmed: 30679099
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Sep 4;32(18):4110-4127
pubmed: 35029645
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):569-79
pubmed: 21509492
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Oct;9(10):474-80
pubmed: 16150631
Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(1):49-57
pubmed: 10356991
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 10;13:156
pubmed: 31191271
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 29;11(5):
pubmed: 33947101
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14425-30
pubmed: 20660768
Physiol Meas. 2012 Feb;33(2):259-70
pubmed: 22273765
Science. 2013 Nov 1;342(6158):1238411
pubmed: 24179229
Neuron. 2021 Feb 3;109(3):404-407
pubmed: 33259804
Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Mar;12(3):131-43
pubmed: 11170305
Neuroscientist. 2022 Dec;28(6):543-551
pubmed: 33660558
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):1-5
pubmed: 19152536
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:285-308
pubmed: 23020640
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):796-814
pubmed: 22059840
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):99-111
pubmed: 14741647
Appl Opt. 2009 Apr 1;48(10):D280-98
pubmed: 19340120
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1988;222:183-9
pubmed: 3129910
Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 Nov 05;4:127
pubmed: 21119770
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Dec;26(6):867-91
pubmed: 17765345
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov;23(11):2592-600
pubmed: 22892422
Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):81-98
pubmed: 20006716
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):5033-7
pubmed: 8197179
Neurophotonics. 2016 Jan;3(1):015004
pubmed: 26866047
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1375-1380
pubmed: 28457867
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4669-80
pubmed: 27122026
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):849-50
pubmed: 10706271
Psychol Sci. 2000 Jan;11(1):86-9
pubmed: 11228851
Neuron. 2006 May 18;50(4):531-4
pubmed: 16701204
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jul;44(10):4136-4151
pubmed: 37195028
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92
pubmed: 15217330
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:66-71
pubmed: 29360060
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):077011
pubmed: 21806291
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116341
pubmed: 31712166
Neuroimage. 2018 Dec;183:280-290
pubmed: 30086411
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):593-602
pubmed: 12689384
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):235-9
pubmed: 16546372
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Feb;14(1):1-9
pubmed: 29091537
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Sep;19(9):566-578
pubmed: 30002509
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007 Aug 08;4:28
pubmed: 17686150
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):1141-1154
pubmed: 30321411
Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):169-77
pubmed: 18378467
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 05;11:431
pubmed: 28928646
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):969-92
pubmed: 16615317
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 7;32(45):16064-9
pubmed: 23136442
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17957
pubmed: 33087785
Sci Rep. 2012;2:959
pubmed: 23233878