Diagnostic role of aortic valve calcium scoring in various etiologies of aortic stenosis.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 05 2023
17 05 2023
Historique:
received:
23
02
2022
accepted:
25
04
2023
medline:
19
5
2023
pubmed:
18
5
2023
entrez:
17
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Most of the studies about aortic valve calcium (AVC) score in aortic stenosis (AS) were based on degenerative or bicuspid AS but not rheumatic AS. We aimed to study the diagnostic accuracy of AVC score to determine severe AS in various etiologies. Adult patients diagnosed with mild to severe AS were enrolled. AVC score were identified from multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scan. The AVC score was highest in bicuspid AS (3211.9 (IQR (1100.0-4562.4) AU) compared to degenerative AS (1803.7 (IQR (1073.6-2550.6) AU)), and rheumatic AS (875.6 (IQR 453.3-1594.0) AU), p < 0.001. For the ROC curve to identify severe AS, the AVC score performed well in degenerative and bicuspid AS with the area under the ROC curve (AuROC) 0.834 (95% CI, 0.730, 0.938) in degenerative group; and 0.820 (95% CI, 0.687, 0.953) in bicuspid AS. Whereas AVC score had non-significant diagnostic accuracy with AuROC 0.667 (95% CI, 0.357, 0.976) for male and 0.60(95% CI, 0.243, 0.957) for female in rheumatic AS. The cut-off AVC score values to identify severe AS were AVCS > 2028.9AU (male) and > 1082.5AU (female) for degenerative AS, and > 2431.8AU (male) and > 1293.5AU (female) for bicuspid AS. In conclusions, AVC score is the accurate test for assessing severity in patients with degenerative and bicuspid AS but performs poorly in rheumatic AS group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37198243
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34118-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-34118-7
pmc: PMC10192370
doi:
Substances chimiques
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8019Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Cardiol. 2015 Winter;10(2):108-112
pubmed: 27274771
Br Heart J. 1977 Mar;39(3):294-8
pubmed: 849390
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):
pubmed: 28790122
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):420-6
pubmed: 26708639
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 23;64(12):1202-13
pubmed: 25236511
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):e25-e197
pubmed: 33342586
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 Mar;130(5-6):168-171
pubmed: 29209824
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38
pubmed: 24076528
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct;11(5):360-366
pubmed: 28803719
Circulation. 2004 Jul 20;110(3):356-62
pubmed: 15249504
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146
pubmed: 29555836
Am J Case Rep. 2015 Mar 30;16:191-5
pubmed: 25819539
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;32(3):471-8
pubmed: 26440659
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):40-7
pubmed: 23233744
Hum Pathol. 1987 Jun;18(6):558-67
pubmed: 3596576
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1813-8
pubmed: 15547235
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 15;112(4):541-53
pubmed: 23726174
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Mar 03;2:16006
pubmed: 27188578
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):W294-303
pubmed: 18430815
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39980
pubmed: 22808080
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1231-43
pubmed: 12831818
Clin Radiol. 2003 Sep;58(9):712-6
pubmed: 12943644
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 18;9(10):e015610
pubmed: 32384012
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 17;120(4):681-691
pubmed: 27879282
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 21;39(28):2618-2624
pubmed: 29136138
Heart. 2011 May;97(9):721-6
pubmed: 20720250
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;118(10):1533-1538
pubmed: 27639685
Acta Radiol. 2019 Apr;60(4):468-477
pubmed: 30080100