Accuracy of cuff blood pressure and systolic blood pressure amplification.


Journal

Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension
ISSN: 1348-4214
Titre abrégé: Hypertens Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9307690

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2023
Historique:
received: 20 12 2022
accepted: 12 04 2023
revised: 23 03 2023
medline: 8 8 2023
pubmed: 23 5 2023
entrez: 22 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Automated cuff measured blood pressure (BP) is the global standard used for diagnosing hypertension, but there are concerns regarding the accuracy of the method. Individual variability in systolic BP (SBP) amplification from central (aorta) to peripheral (brachial) arteries could be related to the accuracy of cuff BP, but this has never been determined and was the aim of this study. Automated cuff BP and invasive brachial BP were recorded in 795 participants (74% male, aged 64 ± 11 years) receiving coronary angiography at five independent research sites (using seven different automated cuff BP devices). SBP amplification was recorded invasively by catheter and defined as brachial SBP minus aortic SBP. Compared with invasive brachial SBP, cuff SBP was significantly underestimated (130 ± 18 mmHg vs. 138 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001). The level of SBP amplification varied significantly among individuals (mean ± SD, 7.3 ± 9.1 mmHg) and was similar to level of difference between cuff and invasive brachial SBP (mean difference -7.6 ± 11.9 mmHg). SBP amplification explained most of the variance in accuracy of cuff SBP (R

Identifiants

pubmed: 37217732
doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0
pii: 10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0
pmc: PMC10404511
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1961-1969

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, Varghese CV, Ordunez P, Zhang XH, Khan T, et al. Sao Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:1744–52.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13741 pubmed: 31769155
Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association Council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2005;45:142–61.
doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e pubmed: 15611362
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:e13–e115.
pubmed: 29133356
Sharman JE, Marwick TH. Accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices: a critical need for improvement that could resolve discrepancy in hypertension guidelines. J Hum Hypertens. 2019;33:89–93.
doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0122-6 pubmed: 30382178
Picone DS, Schultz MG, Otahal P, Aakhus S, Al-Jumaily AM, Black JA, et al. Accuracy of cuff-measured blood pressure: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:572–86.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.064 pubmed: 28750701
Alpert BS, Quinn D, Gallick D. Oscillometric blood pressure: a review for clinicians. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:930–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.08.014 pubmed: 25492837
Sharman JE, Tan I, Stergiou GS, Lombardi C, Saladini F, Butlin M, et al. Automated ‘oscillometric’ blood pressure measuring devices: how they work and what they measure. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37:93–100.
Jílek JO, Stork M. Pulsations in the blood pressure cuff: oscillations or arterial pulses? Int J Biol Biomed Eng. 2012;6:35–42.
Picone DS, Schultz MG, Peng X, Black JA, Dwyer N, Roberts-Thomson P, et al. Discovery of new blood pressure phenotypes and relation to accuracy of cuff devices used in daily clinical practice. Hypertension. 2018;71:1239–47.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10696 pubmed: 29632105
Sharman JE, Avolio AP, Baulmann J, Benetos A, Blacher J, Blizzard CL, et al. Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2805–12.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw632 pubmed: 28158489 pmcid: 5837446
Cheng HM, Wang KL, Chen YH, Lin SJ, Chen LC, Sung SH, et al. Estimation of central systolic blood pressure using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:592–9.
doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.37 pubmed: 20339373
Ding F-H, Li Y, Zhang R-Y, Zhang Q, Wang J-G. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement. J Hypertens. 2013;31:86–93.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835a8eca pubmed: 23188416
Kowalski C, Yang K, Charron T, Doucet M, Hatem R, Kouz R, et al. Inaccuracy of brachial blood pressure and its potential impact on treatment and aortic blood pressure estimation. J Hypertens. 2021;39:2370–8.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002943 pubmed: 34343143
Lin MM, Cheng HM, Sung SH, Liao CF, Chen YH, Huang PH, et al. Estimation of central aortic systolic pressure from the second systolic peak of the peripheral upper limb pulse depends on central aortic pressure waveform morphology. J Hypertens. 2012;30:581–6.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283501354 pubmed: 22245988
Bui TV, Picone DS, Schultz MG, Armstrong MK, Peng X, Black JA, et al. Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification. J Hypertens. 2022;40:2037–44.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228 pubmed: 36052526
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.
doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204 pubmed: 10501650
Celler BG, Argha A, Le PN, Ambikairajah E. Novel methods of testing and calibration of oscillometric blood pressure monitors. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201123.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201123 pubmed: 30080862 pmcid: 6078288
Ramsey M 3rd. Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices. J Clin Monit. 1991;7:56–67.
doi: 10.1007/BF01617900 pubmed: 1999699
Posey JA, Geddes LA, Williams H, Moore AG. The meaning of the point of maximum oscillations in cuff pressure in the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull. 1969;8:15–25.
pubmed: 5357773
Forouzanfar M, Dajani HR, Groza VZ, Bolic M, Rajan S, Batkin I. Oscillometric blood pressure estimation: past, present, and future. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;8:44–63.
doi: 10.1109/RBME.2015.2434215 pubmed: 25993705
Chandrasekhar A, Yavarimanesh M, Hahn JO, Sung SH, Chen CH, Cheng HM, et al. Formulas to explain popular oscillometric blood pressure estimation algorithms. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1415.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01415 pubmed: 31824333 pmcid: 6881246
Amoore JN, Vacher E, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, et al. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:297–305.
doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32826fb773 pubmed: 17890968
Alvarez MA, Padwal R, Ringrose J, Jalali A, Hiebert W. Optimum waveform envelopes and amplitude ratios in oscillometric blood pressure estimation. Blood Press Monit. 2021;26:53–9.
Amoore JN, Lemesre Y, Murray IC, Mieke S, King ST, Smith FE, et al. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements. J Hypertens. 2008;26:35–43.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f06ec7 pubmed: 18090538
Schultz MG, Picone DS, Armstrong MK, Black JA, Dwyer N, Roberts-Thomson P, et al. The influence of SBP amplification on the accuracy of form-factor-derived mean arterial pressure. J Hypertens. 2020;38:1033–9.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002385 pubmed: 32371792
Liu J, Cheng HM, Chen CH, Sung SH, Moslehpour M, Hahn JO, et al. Patient-specific oscillometric blood pressure measurement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63:1220–8.
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2491270 pubmed: 26485351
Padwal R, Campbell NRC, Schutte AE, Olsen MH, Delles C, Etyang A, et al. Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group. J Hypertens. 2019;37:1737–45.
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002112 pubmed: 31034450 pmcid: 6686964
Campbell NRC, Padwal R, Picone DS, Su H, Sharman JE. The impact of small to moderate inaccuracies in assessing blood pressure on hypertension prevalence and control rates. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020;22:939–42.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13915 pubmed: 32485090
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8 pubmed: 12493255
Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos JA, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. 2016;388:2665–712.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5 pubmed: 27671667
John O, Campbell NRC, Brady TM, Farrell M, Varghese C, Velazquez Berumen A, et al. The 2020 “WHO technical specifications for automated non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices with cuff”. Hypertension. 2021;77:806–12.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16625 pubmed: 33517681

Auteurs

Tan V Bui (TV)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Dean S Picone (DS)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Martin G Schultz (MG)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Xiaoqing Peng (X)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

J Andrew Black (JA)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Nathan Dwyer (N)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Philip Roberts-Thomson (P)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Heath Adams (H)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Chen-Huan Chen (CH)

Department of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hao-Min Cheng (HM)

Department of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Giacomo Pucci (G)

Unit of Internal Medicine at Terni University Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Jiguang Wang (J)

Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Department of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Remi Goupil (R)

Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.

James E Sharman (JE)

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. James.Sharman@utas.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH