Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.
sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
sinus resection
wound vacuum-assisted closure
Journal
International wound journal
ISSN: 1742-481X
Titre abrégé: Int Wound J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
revised:
15
04
2023
received:
09
03
2023
accepted:
17
04
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study was aimed at investigating the effect of sinus removal combined with vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. From January 2019 to May 2022, 62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected at our hospital. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: an observation group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 30). The control group underwent a simple sinus resection and suture, while the observation group received a sinus resection combined with closed negative pressure drainage of the wound. A retrospective analysis of the data obtained was conducted. Perioperative indicators, clinical efficacy, postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic effects, and satisfaction scores at six months after the operation were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence rate at six months after the operation was recorded. Through this study, we found that the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time, hospital stay, and return time compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group had a higher overall recurrence rate (ORR) of 100.00%, which was significantly better than the control group's ORR of 86.67% (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation was significantly lower in the observation group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05), the observation group had decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein levels after the operation. Moreover, the total occurrence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower (6.25%) than that of the control group (26.67%; P < 0.05). The observation group also had significantly lower scores on the postoperative scar scale and higher satisfaction scores than the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Our study demonstrated that sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure was more effective in treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus compared with simple sinus resection and suture. This approach significantly reduced surgery time, hospital stay, and return time. It also effectively relieved postoperative pain, reduced the occurrence of postoperative complications, resulted in smaller postoperative scars, and yielded better aesthetic outcomes and higher patient satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37218401
doi: 10.1111/iwj.14218
pmc: PMC10588358
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3474-3482Subventions
Organisme : Suzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects
ID : SYS2020105
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Dec;26(12):1601-7
pubmed: 21573899
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Mar;32(3):288-292
pubmed: 33960849
Pol Przegl Chir. 2021 Jun 21;94(1):20-27
pubmed: 35195080
Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):827-828
pubmed: 34670722
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Sep;25(9):1045-1054
pubmed: 34110535
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Jan 7;116(1-2):12-21
pubmed: 30782310
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2961-2966
pubmed: 34455675
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 09;8:723050
pubmed: 34434960
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):324-328
pubmed: 31415131
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157
pubmed: 30640830
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Apr;34(4):561-568
pubmed: 30810799
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Dec;26(23):9015-9020
pubmed: 36524520
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;25(6):675-682
pubmed: 33728570
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Feb;36(2):339-345
pubmed: 33011845
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6210
pubmed: 33737662
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11;101(45):e31767
pubmed: 36397424
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):508-509
pubmed: 31710171
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1380-1384
pubmed: 33721093
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Apr-Jun;34(2):230-234
pubmed: 35576277
Br J Nurs. 2019 Mar 28;28(6):S24-S28
pubmed: 30925251
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):381-385
pubmed: 34303591
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):555-561
pubmed: 31975537
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Feb 1;34(2):81-85
pubmed: 33443913
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580
pubmed: 33950407
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720
pubmed: 32792519
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3474-3482
pubmed: 37218401
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-5
pubmed: 32678724
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2135-2145
pubmed: 33993341
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5:CD013439
pubmed: 35593897
Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):370-378
pubmed: 30440104
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):458-463
pubmed: 33185031