Clinical validation of MR imaging time reduction for substitute/synthetic CT generation for prostate MRI-only treatment planning.
MRI-Only
Prostate
sCT
Journal
Physical and engineering sciences in medicine
ISSN: 2662-4737
Titre abrégé: Phys Eng Sci Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101760671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
26
04
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radiotherapy treatment planning based only on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become clinically achievable. Though computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for radiotherapy imaging, directly providing the electron density values needed for planning calculations, MRI has superior soft tissue visualisation to guide treatment planning decisions and optimisation. MRI-only planning removes the need for the CT scan, but requires generation of a substitute/synthetic/pseudo CT (sCT) for electron density information. Shortening the MRI imaging time would improve patient comfort and reduce the likelihood of motion artefacts. A volunteer study was previously carried out to investigate and optimise faster MRI sequences for a hybrid atlas-voxel conversion to sCT for prostate treatment planning. The aim of this follow-on study was to clinically validate the performance of the new optimised sequence for sCT generation in a treated MRI-only prostate patient cohort. 10 patients undergoing MRI-only treatment were scanned on a Siemens Skyra 3T MRI as part of the MRI-only sub-study of the NINJA clinical trial (ACTRN12618001806257). Two sequences were used, the standard 3D T2-weighted SPACE sequence used for sCT conversion which has been previously validated against CT, and a modified fast SPACE sequence, selected based on the volunteer study. Both were used to generate sCT scans. These were then compared to evaluate the fast sequence conversion for anatomical and dosimetric accuracy against the clinically approved treatment plans. The average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for the body was 14.98 ± 2.35 HU, and for bone was 40.77 ± 5.51 HU. The external volume contour comparison produced a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of at least 0.976, and an average of 0.985 ± 0.004, and the bony anatomy contour comparison a DSC of at least 0.907, and an average of 0.950 ± 0.018. The fast SPACE sCT agreed with the gold standard sCT within an isocentre dose of -0.28% ± 0.16% and an average gamma pass rate of 99.66% ± 0.41% for a 1%/1 mm gamma tolerance. In this clinical validation study, the fast sequence, which reduced the required imaging time by approximately a factor of 4, produced an sCT with similar clinical dosimetric results compared to the standard sCT, demonstrating its potential for clinical use for treatment planning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37219797
doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01268-x
pii: 10.1007/s13246-023-01268-x
pmc: PMC10480277
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1015-1021Informations de copyright
© 2023. Crown.
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2006 May;55(5):1093-105
pubmed: 16598731
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):28
pubmed: 28126030
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Nov 21;49(22):5157-70
pubmed: 15609565
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Nov 1;99(3):692-700
pubmed: 28843375
Med Dosim. 2019 Winter;44(4):e64-e70
pubmed: 30713000
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan;20(1):101-109
pubmed: 30474353
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Sep 10;63(18):185001
pubmed: 30109989
Phys Med. 2022 Nov;103:108-118
pubmed: 36272328
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):745-67
pubmed: 24399498
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 9;15(1):77
pubmed: 32272943
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Jun;47(6):1202-10
pubmed: 12111967
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 29;9:826
pubmed: 31555587
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Jun;20(6):1317-24
pubmed: 2045306
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021 Sep;44(3):799-807
pubmed: 34228255
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):55-72
pubmed: 22696125
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Feb 26;63(5):05TR01
pubmed: 29393071
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jul;57(7):902-907
pubmed: 29488426
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):160-8
pubmed: 24931086
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Sep 1;111(1):208-219
pubmed: 33811976
Med Phys. 2021 Nov;48(11):6537-6566
pubmed: 34407209
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jan;39(1):189-94
pubmed: 24123420
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):71
pubmed: 31036034
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e5-11
pubmed: 22330995
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Nov 7;60(21):R297-322
pubmed: 26448064
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug 02;11:103
pubmed: 27485637
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Jan 1;100(1):199-217
pubmed: 29254773
Med Phys. 2015 Oct;42(10):6090-7
pubmed: 26429284
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Dec 7;59(23):7383-91
pubmed: 25386792
Phys Med. 2021 Sep;89:265-281
pubmed: 34474325
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):1144-53
pubmed: 26581150
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Aug;22(8):93-104
pubmed: 34184390
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Apr 21;62(8):2961-2975
pubmed: 27983520