Development and Validation of a Multi-institutional Nomogram of Outcomes for PSMA-PET-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2023
01 05 2023
Historique:
medline:
25
5
2023
pubmed:
23
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prostate-specific antigen membrane positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is increasingly used to guide salvage radiotherapy (sRT) after radical prostatectomy for patients with recurrent or persistent prostate cancer. To develop and validate a nomogram for prediction of freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) after PSMA-PET-based sRT. This retrospective cohort study included 1029 patients with prostate cancer treated between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2020, at 11 centers from 5 countries. The initial database consisted of 1221 patients. All patients had a PSMA-PET scan prior to sRT. Data were analyzed in November 2022. Patients with a detectable post-radical prostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level treated with sRT to the prostatic fossa with or without additional sRT to pelvic lymphatics or concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were eligible. The FFBF rate was estimated, and a predictive nomogram was generated and validated. Biochemical relapse was defined as a PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL after sRT. In the nomogram creation and validation process, 1029 patients (median age at sRT, 70 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) were included and further divided into a training set (n = 708), internal validation set (n = 271), and external outlier validation set (n = 50). The median follow-up was 32 months (IQR, 21-45 months). Based on the PSMA-PET scan prior to sRT, 437 patients (42.5%) had local recurrences and 313 patients (30.4%) had nodal recurrences. Pelvic lymphatics were electively irradiated for 395 patients (38.4%). All patients received sRT to the prostatic fossa: 103 (10.0%) received a dose of less than 66 Gy, 551 (53.5%) received a dose of 66 to 70 Gy, and 375 (36.5%) received a dose of more than 70 Gy. Androgen deprivation therapy was given to 325 (31.6%) patients. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, pre-sRT PSA level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.41-2.31]), International Society of Urological Pathology grade in surgery specimen (grade 5 vs 1+2: HR, 2.39 [95% CI, 1.63-3.50], pT stage (pT3b+pT4 vs pT2: HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.39-2.67]), surgical margins (R0 vs R1+R2+Rx: HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.78]), ADT use (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.37-0.65]), sRT dose (>70 vs ≤66 Gy: HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.67]), and nodal recurrence detected on PSMA-PET scans (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09-1.85]) were associated with FFBF. The mean (SD) nomogram concordance index for FFBF was 0.72 (0.06) for the internal validation cohort and 0.67 (0.11) in the external outlier validation cohort. This cohort study of patients with prostate cancer presents an internally and externally validated nomogram that estimated individual patient outcomes after PSMA-PET-guided sRT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37219907
pii: 2805173
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14748
pmc: PMC10208140
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Androgen Antagonists
0
Androgens
0
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2314748Références
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1208-1216
pubmed: 32209449
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):403-417
pubmed: 30773328
Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):306-315
pubmed: 34140144
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):5577-5589
pubmed: 35106656
J Nucl Med. 2020 Dec;61(12):1793-1799
pubmed: 32358094
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 15;100(4):858-865
pubmed: 29485063
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 01;5(6):856-863
pubmed: 30920593
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3648-3654
pubmed: 27528718
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;60(7):963-970
pubmed: 30552203
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124(5):785-791
pubmed: 31220400
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-796
pubmed: 33471548
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3172-3179
pubmed: 35737923
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262
pubmed: 33172724
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Aug 1;113(5):1025-1035
pubmed: 35469897
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Aug 1;113(5):1015-1024
pubmed: 35659629
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905
pubmed: 29509865
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):243-50
pubmed: 24680359
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):460-7
pubmed: 25234359
J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1972-1976
pubmed: 28747524