Ubiquitination regulates ER-phagy and remodelling of endoplasmic reticulum.


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 29 03 2022
accepted: 14 04 2023
medline: 9 6 2023
pubmed: 25 5 2023
entrez: 24 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) undergoes continuous remodelling via a selective autophagy pathway, known as ER-phagy

Identifiants

pubmed: 37225996
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06089-2
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-06089-2
pmc: PMC10247366
doi:

Substances chimiques

Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins 0
Ubiquitins 0
Microtubule-Associated Proteins 0
Receptors, Autocrine Motility Factor EC 2.3.2.27

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

394-401

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Gubas, A. & Dikic, I. ER remodeling via ER-phagy. Mol. Cell 82, 1492–1500 (2022).
pubmed: 35452617 pmcid: 9098120
Chino, H. & Mizushima, N. ER-phagy: quality and quantity control of the endoplasmic reticulum by autophagy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 15, a041256 (2023).
pubmed: 35940904
Khaminets, A. et al. Regulation of endoplasmic reticulum turnover by selective autophagy. Nature 522, 354–358 (2015).
pubmed: 26040720
Bhaskara, R. M. et al. Curvature induction and membrane remodeling by FAM134B reticulon homology domain assist selective ER-phagy. Nat. Commun. 10, 2370 (2019).
pubmed: 31147549 pmcid: 6542808
Reggio, A. et al. Role of FAM134 paralogues in endoplasmic reticulum remodeling, ER-phagy, and collagen quality control. EMBO Rep. 22, e52289 (2021).
pubmed: 34338405 pmcid: 8447607
Siggel, M., Bhaskara, R. M., Moesser, M. K., Dikic, I. & Hummer, G. FAM134B-RHD protein clustering drives spontaneous budding of asymmetric membranes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 1926–1931 (2021).
pubmed: 33591770 pmcid: 8028312
Jiang, X. et al. FAM134B oligomerization drives endoplasmic reticulum membrane scission for ER-phagy. EMBO J. 39, e102608 (2020).
pubmed: 31930741 pmcid: 7049798
Chino, H., Hatta, T., Natsume, T. & Mizushima, N. Intrinsically disordered protein TEX264 mediates ER-phagy. Mol. Cell 74, 909–921.e906 (2019).
pubmed: 31006538
Sauer, M. & Heilemann, M. Single-molecule localization microscopy in eukaryotes. Chem. Rev. 117, 7478–7509 (2017).
pubmed: 28287710
Schnitzbauer, J., Strauss, M. T., Schlichthaerle, T., Schueder, F. & Jungmann, R. Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1198–1228 (2017).
pubmed: 28518172
Levet, F. et al. SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data. Nat. Methods 12, 1065–1071 (2015).
pubmed: 26344046
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (AAAI Press, 1996).
Jungmann, R. et al. Quantitative super-resolution imaging with qPAINT. Nat. Methods 13, 439–442 (2016).
pubmed: 27018580 pmcid: 4941813
Croucher, D. R. et al. Bimolecular complementation affinity purification (BiCAP) reveals dimer-specific protein interactions for ERBB2 dimers. Sci. Signal. 9, ra69 (2016).
pubmed: 27405979
Grumati, P. et al. Full length RTN3 regulates turnover of tubular endoplasmic reticulum via selective autophagy. eLife 6, e25555 (2017).
pubmed: 28617241 pmcid: 5517149
Gubas, A. & Dikic, I. A guide to the regulation of selective autophagy receptors. FEBS J. 289, 75–89 (2022).
pubmed: 33730405
Chen, Z., Du, S. & Fang, S. gp78: A multifaceted ubiquitin ligase that integrates a unique protein degradation pathway from the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13, 414–424 (2012).
pubmed: 22812524
Li, W. et al. Mechanistic insights into active site-associated polyubiquitination by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ube2g2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3722–3727 (2009).
pubmed: 19223579 pmcid: 2644258
Foronda, H. et al. Heteromeric clusters of ubiquitinated ER-shaping proteins drive ER-phagy. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06090-9 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06090-9 pubmed: 37225994
Liang, J. R. et al. A genome-wide ER-phagy screen highlights key roles of mitochondrial metabolism and ER-resident UFMylation. Cell 180, 1160–1177.e20 (2020).
pubmed: 32160526 pmcid: 7197389
Hubner, C. A. & Dikic, I. ER-phagy and human diseases. Cell Death Differ. 27, 833–842 (2020).
pubmed: 31659280
Gordon, W. R. et al. Effects of S1 cleavage on the structure, surface export, and signaling activity of human Notch1 and Notch2. PLoS ONE4, e6613 (2009).
Izadi, M. et al. Cobl-like promotes actin filament formation and dendritic branching using only a single WH2 domain. J. Cell Biol. 217, 211–230 (2018).
pubmed: 29233863 pmcid: 5748978
Chaudhary, S., Pak, J. E., Gruswitz, F., Sharma, V. & Stroud, R. M. Overexpressing human membrane proteins in stably transfected and clonal human embryonic kidney 293S cells. Nat. Protoc. 7, 453–466 (2012).
pubmed: 22322218 pmcid: 3613139
Schneider, K. et al. ProSAP1 and membrane nanodomain-associated syndapin I promote postsynapse formation and function. J. Cell Biol. 205, 197–215 (2014).
pubmed: 24751538 pmcid: 4003247
Seemann, E. et al. Deciphering caveolar functions by syndapin III KO-mediated impairment of caveolar invagination. eLife 6, e29854 (2017).
pubmed: 29202928 pmcid: 5716666
Wolf, D. et al. Ankyrin repeat-containing N-Ank proteins shape cellular membranes. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1191–1205 (2019).
pubmed: 31548610
Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
pubmed: 19029910
Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731–740 (2016).
pubmed: 27348712
Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).
pubmed: 17327847
Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014).
pubmed: 24942700 pmcid: 4159666
Deutsch, E. W. et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D1100–D1106 (2017).
pubmed: 27924013
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).
pubmed: 30395289
Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812–7824 (2007).
pubmed: 17569554
Monticelli, L. et al. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 819–834 (2008).
pubmed: 26621095
Wassenaar, T. A., Ingolfsson, H. I., Bockmann, R. A., Tieleman, D. P. & Marrink, S. J. Computational lipidomics with insane: a versatile tool for generating custom membranes for molecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 2144–2155 (2015).
pubmed: 26574417
Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195–202 (1999).
pubmed: 10493868
Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637 (1983).
pubmed: 6667333
Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 52, 255–268 (1984).
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
pubmed: 17212484
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015).
Pronk, S. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845–854 (2013).
pubmed: 23407358 pmcid: 3605599
Daura, X. et al. Peptide folding: when simulation meets experiment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 236–240 (1999).
Durrant, J. D. & Amaro, R. E. LipidWrapper: an algorithm for generating large-scale membrane models of arbitrary geometry. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003720 (2014).
Benayad, Z., von Bulow, S., Stelzl, L. S. & Hummer, G. Simulation of FUS protein condensates with an adapted coarse-grained model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 525–537 (2021).
pubmed: 33307683
Schroder, M. S. et al. Imaging the fibroblast growth factor receptor network on the plasma membrane with DNA-assisted single-molecule super-resolution microscopy. Methods 193, 38–45 (2021).
pubmed: 32389748
Jungmann, R. et al. Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT. Nat. Methods 11, 313–318 (2014).
pubmed: 24487583 pmcid: 4153392
Edelstein, A. D. et al. Advanced methods of microscope control using muManager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e10 (2014).
pubmed: 25606571
Endesfelder, U., Malkusch, S., Fricke, F. & Heilemann, M. A simple method to estimate the average localization precision of a single-molecule localization microscopy experiment. Histochem. Cell Biol. 141, 629–638 (2014).
pubmed: 24522395
Glogger, M., Spahn, C., Enderlein, J. & Heilemann, M. Multi-color, bleaching-resistant super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging with oligonucleotide-based exchangeable fluorophores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 6310–6313 (2021).
El Beheiry, M. & Dahan, M. ViSP: representing single-particle localizations in three dimensions. Nat. Methods 10, 689–690 (2013).
pubmed: 23900246
Jayasinghe, I. et al. True molecular scale visualization of variable clustering properties of ryanodine receptors. Cell Rep. 22, 557–567 (2018).
pubmed: 29320748 pmcid: 5775502

Auteurs

Alexis González (A)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Adriana Covarrubias-Pinto (A)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Ramachandra M Bhaskara (RM)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Marius Glogger (M)

Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Santosh K Kuncha (SK)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Audrey Xavier (A)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Eric Seemann (E)

Institute of Biochemistry I, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Mohit Misra (M)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Marina E Hoffmann (ME)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Bastian Bräuning (B)

Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.

Ashwin Balakrishnan (A)

Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Britta Qualmann (B)

Institute of Biochemistry I, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Volker Dötsch (V)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Brenda A Schulman (BA)

Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.

Michael M Kessels (MM)

Institute of Biochemistry I, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Christian A Hübner (CA)

Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Mike Heilemann (M)

Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Gerhard Hummer (G)

Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Institute of Biophysics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Ivan Dikić (I)

Institute of Biochemistry II, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. dikic@biochem2.uni-frankfurt.de.
Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. dikic@biochem2.uni-frankfurt.de.
Fraunhofer Institute of Translational Medicine and Pharmacology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. dikic@biochem2.uni-frankfurt.de.

Articles similaires

Animals Dogs Dog Diseases Autophagy Immunohistochemistry
1.00
Plasmodesmata Endoplasmic Reticulum Arabidopsis Cytokinesis Arabidopsis Proteins
Animals Humans TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Animals Diabetic Nephropathies Mice, Knockout Mice Male

Classifications MeSH