Stratified split sampling of electronic health records.

Electronic health record Generalizability Replicability Subgroup

Journal

BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 05 2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2022
accepted: 04 05 2023
medline: 29 5 2023
pubmed: 26 5 2023
entrez: 25 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although superficially similar to data from clinical research, data extracted from electronic health records may require fundamentally different approaches for model building and analysis. Because electronic health record data is designed for clinical, rather than scientific use, researchers must first provide clear definitions of outcome and predictor variables. Yet an iterative process of defining outcomes and predictors, assessing association, and then repeating the process may increase Type I error rates, and thus decrease the chance of replicability, defined by the National Academy of Sciences as the chance of "obtaining consistent results across studies aimed at answering the same scientific question, each of which has obtained its own data."[1] In addition, failure to account for subgroups may mask heterogeneous associations between predictor and outcome by subgroups, and decrease the generalizability of the findings. To increase chances of replicability and generalizability, we recommend using a stratified split sample approach for studies using electronic health records. A split sample approach divides the data randomly into an exploratory set for iterative variable definition, iterative analyses of association, and consideration of subgroups. The confirmatory set is used only to replicate results found in the first set. The addition of the word 'stratified' indicates that rare subgroups are oversampled randomly by including them in the exploratory sample at higher rates than appear in the population. The stratified sampling provides a sufficient sample size for assessing heterogeneity of association by testing for effect modification by group membership. An electronic health record study of the associations between socio-demographic factors and uptake of hepatic cancer screening, and potential heterogeneity of association in subgroups defined by gender, self-identified race and ethnicity, census-tract level poverty and insurance type illustrates the recommended approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37231360
doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01938-0
pii: 10.1186/s12874-023-01938-0
pmc: PMC10210417
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

128

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM121081
Pays : United States
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS028283
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Adv Nutr. 2019 May 1;10(3):391-409
pubmed: 30926984
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2648-2662
pubmed: 26670066
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 20;29(4):504-20
pubmed: 20013937
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304
pubmed: 17951106
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jun 23;125(6):067013
pubmed: 28665274
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):451-455
pubmed: 29045273
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e226-31
pubmed: 23956018
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):389-390
pubmed: 22381501
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Dec 17;1(3):1035
pubmed: 25848578
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 1;119(5):370-6
pubmed: 8338290
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(1):42-57
pubmed: 24392977
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S79-S84
pubmed: 32479175
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):12
pubmed: 36635621

Auteurs

Tianyao Huo (T)

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road; Room 2236-5, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.

Deborah H Glueck (DH)

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, 12474 E. 19th Avenue, Building 402, Room 219 Main Stop F426, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Elizabeth A Shenkman (EA)

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road; Room 2245, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.

Keith E Muller (KE)

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road; Room 2244, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA. kmuller@ufl.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH