Understanding the neural mechanisms for infants' perception of native and non-native speech.

Abstract mismatch negativity (MMN) Electroencephalography (EEG) Perceptual narrowing Positive mismatch response (MMR) Speech perception

Journal

Brain and language
ISSN: 1090-2155
Titre abrégé: Brain Lang
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7506220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 02 08 2022
revised: 26 04 2023
accepted: 04 05 2023
medline: 12 6 2023
pubmed: 27 5 2023
entrez: 26 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Though perceptual narrowing has been widely recognized as a process guiding cognitive development and category learning in infancy and early childhood, its neural mechanisms and traits at a cortical level remain unclear. Using an electroencephalography (EEG) abstract mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm, Australian infants' neural sensitivity to (native) English and (non-native) Nuu-Chah-Nulth speech contrasts was examined in a cross-sectional design at the onset (5-6 months) and offset (11-12 months) of perceptual narrowing. Immature mismatch responses (MMR) were observed among younger infants for both contrasts, while older infants showed MMR response to the non-native contrast, and both MMR and MMN to the native contrast. Sensitivity to the Nuu-Chah-Nulth contrast at perceptual narrowing offset was retained yet stayed immature. Findings conform to perceptual assimilation theories, reflecting plasticity in early speech perception and development. Compared to behavioural paradigms, neural examination effectively reveals experience-induced processing differences to subtle contrasts at the offset of perceptual narrowing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37236016
pii: S0093-934X(23)00058-5
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105279
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105279

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Liquan Liu (L)

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Australia; The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Australia; Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian Research Council, Australia; Center for Multilingualism in Society across the Lifespan, University of Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: l.liu@westernsydney.edu.au.

Varghese Peter (V)

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Australia; School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Electronic address: vpeter@usc.edu.au.

Michael D Tyler (MD)

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Australia; The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Australia; Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian Research Council, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH