Understanding the neural mechanisms for infants' perception of native and non-native speech.
Abstract mismatch negativity (MMN)
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Perceptual narrowing
Positive mismatch response (MMR)
Speech perception
Journal
Brain and language
ISSN: 1090-2155
Titre abrégé: Brain Lang
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7506220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
received:
02
08
2022
revised:
26
04
2023
accepted:
04
05
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
27
5
2023
entrez:
26
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Though perceptual narrowing has been widely recognized as a process guiding cognitive development and category learning in infancy and early childhood, its neural mechanisms and traits at a cortical level remain unclear. Using an electroencephalography (EEG) abstract mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm, Australian infants' neural sensitivity to (native) English and (non-native) Nuu-Chah-Nulth speech contrasts was examined in a cross-sectional design at the onset (5-6 months) and offset (11-12 months) of perceptual narrowing. Immature mismatch responses (MMR) were observed among younger infants for both contrasts, while older infants showed MMR response to the non-native contrast, and both MMR and MMN to the native contrast. Sensitivity to the Nuu-Chah-Nulth contrast at perceptual narrowing offset was retained yet stayed immature. Findings conform to perceptual assimilation theories, reflecting plasticity in early speech perception and development. Compared to behavioural paradigms, neural examination effectively reveals experience-induced processing differences to subtle contrasts at the offset of perceptual narrowing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37236016
pii: S0093-934X(23)00058-5
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105279
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105279Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.