Annual trends of cystectomy complications: A contemporary analysis of the NSQIP database.

Despite significant morbidity, radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, certain high-risk nonmuscle invasive tumors and after failure of intravesical or trimodal therapy. Modern efforts have hastened the recovery after this surgery without impact on overall complication rates. Our primary aim was to examine changes in complication rates of RC over time. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database included 11,351 RC from 2006 to 2018 for nondisseminated bladder cancer. Baseline characteristics and complication rates were studied across time periods: 2006 to 2011, 2012 to 2014, and 2015 to 2018. Thirty-day complications, readmissions, and mortality were identified. Overall complication rates decreased over time (56.5%, 57.4%, 50.6%, P < 0.01). Infectious complications were stable, including UTIs (10.1%, 8.8%, 8.3% respectively, P = 0.11) and sepsis (10.4%, 8.8%, 8.7% respectively, P = 0.20). On multivariable analysis, ASA≥3 (OR 1.399, 95% CI 1.279-1.530) was associated with increased complications, while procedures in 2015 to 2018 (OR 0.825, 95% CI 0.722-0.942), laparoscopic/robotic approach (OR 0.555, 95%CI 0.494-0.622), and ileal conduit (OR 0.796, 95% CI 0.719-0.882) were associated with decreased complication rates. Other outcomes of interest included mean length of stay (LOS), which decreased over time (10.5, 9.8, 8.6 days, respectively, P < 0.01) and readmission (20.0%, 21.3%, 21.0%, respectively, P = 0.84) and mortality rates were stable (2.7%, 1.7%, 2.0%, respectively, P = 0.13). Decreased early complications and LOS after RC over time may reflect beneficial effects of recent advances in bladder cancer treatment such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive techniques. Further opportunities to improve long term outcomes, readmissions and infection rates are needed.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.