Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2023
Historique:
received: 11 01 2023
accepted: 08 05 2023
medline: 31 5 2023
pubmed: 30 5 2023
entrez: 29 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The increasing demand for childbirth care based on physiological principles has led official bodies to encourage health centers to provide evidence-based care aimed at promoting women's participation in informed decision-making and avoiding excessive medical intervention during childbirth. One of the goals is to reduce pain and find alternative measures to epidural anesthesia to enhance women's autonomy and well-being during childbirth. Currently, water immersion is used as a non-pharmacological method for pain relief. This review aimed to identify and synthesize evidence on women's and midwives' experiences, values, and preferences regarding water immersion during childbirth. A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence were conducted. Databases were searched and references were checked according to specific criteria. Studies that used qualitative data collection and analysis methods to examine the opinions of women or midwives in the hospital setting were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed-methods studies that did not separately report qualitative results, and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Research Checklist was used to assess study quality, and results were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The qualitative studies yielded three key themes: 1) reasons identified by women and midwives for choosing a water birth, 2) benefits experienced in water births, and 3) barriers and facilitators of water immersion during childbirth. The evidence from qualitative studies indicates that women report benefits associated with water birth. From the perspective of midwives, ensuring safe water births requires adequate resources, midwives training, and rigorous standardized protocols to ensure that all pregnant women can safely opt for water immersion during childbirth with satisfactory results.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The increasing demand for childbirth care based on physiological principles has led official bodies to encourage health centers to provide evidence-based care aimed at promoting women's participation in informed decision-making and avoiding excessive medical intervention during childbirth. One of the goals is to reduce pain and find alternative measures to epidural anesthesia to enhance women's autonomy and well-being during childbirth. Currently, water immersion is used as a non-pharmacological method for pain relief. This review aimed to identify and synthesize evidence on women's and midwives' experiences, values, and preferences regarding water immersion during childbirth.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence were conducted. Databases were searched and references were checked according to specific criteria. Studies that used qualitative data collection and analysis methods to examine the opinions of women or midwives in the hospital setting were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed-methods studies that did not separately report qualitative results, and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Research Checklist was used to assess study quality, and results were synthesized using thematic synthesis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The qualitative studies yielded three key themes: 1) reasons identified by women and midwives for choosing a water birth, 2) benefits experienced in water births, and 3) barriers and facilitators of water immersion during childbirth.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The evidence from qualitative studies indicates that women report benefits associated with water birth. From the perspective of midwives, ensuring safe water births requires adequate resources, midwives training, and rigorous standardized protocols to ensure that all pregnant women can safely opt for water immersion during childbirth with satisfactory results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37248449
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7
pii: 10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7
pmc: PMC10226235
doi:

Substances chimiques

Water 059QF0KO0R

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

395

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Women Birth. 2016 Oct;29(5):450-454
pubmed: 27038559
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:26-31
pubmed: 30223104
Midwifery. 2020 Mar;82:102622
pubmed: 31951904
Midwifery. 1998 Mar;14(1):30-6
pubmed: 9633375
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43
pubmed: 22829486
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5:CD000111
pubmed: 29768662
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):719
pubmed: 33228569
Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:73-81
pubmed: 26549568
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):23
pubmed: 29320998
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249
pubmed: 29921233
Women Birth. 2020 Nov;33(6):566-573
pubmed: 31883699
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):2942-2956
pubmed: 33464640
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):
pubmed: 32188019
Women Birth. 2007 Mar;20(1):17-24
pubmed: 17174165
Eur J Midwifery. 2018 Jul 12;2:7
pubmed: 33537568
J Adv Nurs. 2020 May;76(5):1221-1231
pubmed: 32090362
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181
pubmed: 23185978
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2
pubmed: 29384079
Midwifery. 2014 Jan;30(1):e20-5
pubmed: 24225432
Women Birth. 2019 Jun;32(3):255-262
pubmed: 30196039

Auteurs

E Reviriego-Rodrigo (E)

Osteba, Health Technology Assessment, Knowledge Management and Evaluation, Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain. ereviriego@bioef.eus.

N Ibargoyen-Roteta (N)

Osteba, Health Technology Assessment, Knowledge Management and Evaluation, Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain.

S Carreguí-Vilar (S)

La Plana University Hospital, Villarreal-Castellón, Spain.

L Mediavilla-Serrano (L)

Osakidetza, OSI Debabarrena, Mendaro Hospital, Mendaro-Gipuzkoa, Spain.

S Uceira-Rey (S)

Hospital da Barbanza, Ribeira-A Coruña, Spain.

S Iglesias-Casás (S)

Hospital do Salnés, Vilagarcía de Arousa-Pontevedra, Spain.

A Martín-Casado (A)

Universidad Internacional de La Rioja UNIR, Logroño-La Rioja, Spain.

A Toledo-Chávarri (A)

Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation, Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), The Spanish Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment and Services of the National Health System (RedETS), Madrid, Spain.

G Ares-Mateos (G)

Pediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

S Montero-Carcaboso (S)

Osakidetza, OSI Debabarrena, Mendaro Hospital, Mendaro-Gipuzkoa, Spain.

B Castelló-Zamora (B)

Documentary of the Department of Health of the Basque Government, Territorial Delegation of Health of Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain.

N Burgos-Alonso (N)

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Nursery, UPV/EHU, ES, Leioa, Spain.

A Moreno-Rodríguez (A)

Osakidetza, OSI Araba, Hospital Txagorritxu, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

N Hernández-Tejada (N)

People with Intellectual Disabilities, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

C Koetsenruyter (C)

Mayan Center, Maternity, Yoga and Accompaniment, Bilbao, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH