Mask dependency of the lacrimal gland dose under whole brain radiotherapy when the six-degrees of freedom couch is not available.
6D couch
dry eye syndrome
frameless stereotactic mask
lacrimal gland
rotational error
whole brain treatment
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
revised:
25
04
2023
received:
28
12
2022
accepted:
05
05
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
31
5
2023
entrez:
31
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dry eye syndrome has been recently reported in patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT based on a couch with three-degrees of freedom (3D) can occasionally be performed in which the rotational head motion is not corrected. This study assessed the dependency of the rotational errors on the mask and the dose variation of the lens and lacrimal gland in WBRT patients. Translational and rotational setup errors were obtained at the first treatment with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patients under WBRT and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 20 each) immobilized using a conventional WB mask and an SRS mask with a bite block, respectively. For the CT sets of SRS cases, WBRT plans were generated for the study. To simulate the rotational error, rotated CT images were created with each rotational error, on which initial WBRT plans were copied and doses were recalculated. The lens and lacrimal gland doses with and without rotation errors were compared. Despite similar translational setup errors for the two masks, the SRS mask showed a dramatic reduction in rotational errors compared to those of the WB mask. The errors varied within -2.9° to 2.9° and -1.2° to 0.7° for the WB and SRS masks, respectively. Accordingly, the SRS mask confined the change in the maximum lens dose, mean dose of the lacrimal gland, and lacrimal volume receiving 15 Gy to one-third of those using the WB mask. When the six-degrees of freedom (6D) couch is not available, the frameless SRS mask is beneficial to WBRT for the faithful treatment as it was planned.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dry eye syndrome has been recently reported in patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT based on a couch with three-degrees of freedom (3D) can occasionally be performed in which the rotational head motion is not corrected. This study assessed the dependency of the rotational errors on the mask and the dose variation of the lens and lacrimal gland in WBRT patients.
METHODS
METHODS
Translational and rotational setup errors were obtained at the first treatment with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for patients under WBRT and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 20 each) immobilized using a conventional WB mask and an SRS mask with a bite block, respectively. For the CT sets of SRS cases, WBRT plans were generated for the study. To simulate the rotational error, rotated CT images were created with each rotational error, on which initial WBRT plans were copied and doses were recalculated. The lens and lacrimal gland doses with and without rotation errors were compared.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Despite similar translational setup errors for the two masks, the SRS mask showed a dramatic reduction in rotational errors compared to those of the WB mask. The errors varied within -2.9° to 2.9° and -1.2° to 0.7° for the WB and SRS masks, respectively. Accordingly, the SRS mask confined the change in the maximum lens dose, mean dose of the lacrimal gland, and lacrimal volume receiving 15 Gy to one-third of those using the WB mask.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
When the six-degrees of freedom (6D) couch is not available, the frameless SRS mask is beneficial to WBRT for the faithful treatment as it was planned.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37254709
doi: 10.1002/acm2.14052
pmc: PMC10338750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14052Subventions
Organisme : National Research Foundation of Korea
Organisme : Korea government
ID : 2021R1F1A1050932
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jun;23(6):e13613
pubmed: 35441441
BMC Cancer. 2014 Oct 31;14:793
pubmed: 25361811
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jul 10;12:283
pubmed: 22780988
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Nov 15;105(4):765-772
pubmed: 31351194
Z Med Phys. 2014 May;24(2):112-22
pubmed: 24418323
Med Dosim. 2017 Winter;42(4):357-362
pubmed: 28784430
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):467-74
pubmed: 21945110
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Jul;24(7):e14052
pubmed: 37254709
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jul 08;17(4):86-94
pubmed: 27455488
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Mar;19(2):111-120
pubmed: 29363282
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 08;16(5):35-45
pubmed: 26699314
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):483-491
pubmed: 29272161
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):1125-31
pubmed: 19231099