Adaptations to scale-up an early childhood education and care physical activity intervention for real-world availability - Play Active.
Childcare
Delivery mode
Fidelity
Implementation
Policy
Journal
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2023
01 06 2023
Historique:
received:
27
01
2023
accepted:
25
04
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
2
6
2023
entrez:
1
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adaptations for scale-up are ubiquitous but are rarely described in detail. Adaptations may be a key reason for the "scale-up penalty" which is when there is a reduction in intervention effect size following scale-up. The Play Active intervention consists of a physical activity policy for early childhood education and care (ECEC) services, with accompanying implementation support strategies. It was first implemented with 81 ECEC services in Perth, Western Australia, in 2021 - with significant positive changes in physical activity practice uptake. The aim of this paper is to describe the extent, type, fidelity consistency, goals, size, scope, and proposed impact of proposed adaptations to the implementation support strategies for scaling-up Play Active. Proposed adaptations were defined as planned changes, made prior to making the intervention available. The authors created a list of adaptations from a comparison of the Play Active implementation support strategies, before and after adaptation for proposed statewide availability across Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia, Australia. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to code adaptations to implementation support strategies. Three authors coded each adaptation and rated their size, scope and proposed impact. Fifty-three adaptations to Play Active were identified. Most (68%) were proposed for the 'content' of implementation strategies, including aspects of their delivery. In practice, this involved changing the delivery mode of implementation support strategies from phone call and email support, to website-based delivery. More than half (56%) of adaptations involved 'adding elements' for scale-up. Most adaptations were 'fidelity consistent' (95%). The main goals for adaptations were related to 'increasing the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility' (45%), 'decreasing the costs' (19%) and 'increasing adoption of the evidence-based practice' (19%). Adaptations were small to medium in size, with most proposed to have a positive (87%) or neutral (8%) effect on the effectiveness of the intervention, rather than negative (4%). A large number of small, fidelity-consistent, adaptations were proposed for Play Active scale-up. Overall, the process of reporting adaptations was found to be feasible. To understand the impact of these adaptations, it will be important to re-evaluate implementation, effectiveness and process outcomes, at-scale.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Adaptations for scale-up are ubiquitous but are rarely described in detail. Adaptations may be a key reason for the "scale-up penalty" which is when there is a reduction in intervention effect size following scale-up. The Play Active intervention consists of a physical activity policy for early childhood education and care (ECEC) services, with accompanying implementation support strategies. It was first implemented with 81 ECEC services in Perth, Western Australia, in 2021 - with significant positive changes in physical activity practice uptake. The aim of this paper is to describe the extent, type, fidelity consistency, goals, size, scope, and proposed impact of proposed adaptations to the implementation support strategies for scaling-up Play Active.
METHODS
Proposed adaptations were defined as planned changes, made prior to making the intervention available. The authors created a list of adaptations from a comparison of the Play Active implementation support strategies, before and after adaptation for proposed statewide availability across Western Australia, Queensland and South Australia, Australia. We used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to code adaptations to implementation support strategies. Three authors coded each adaptation and rated their size, scope and proposed impact.
RESULTS
Fifty-three adaptations to Play Active were identified. Most (68%) were proposed for the 'content' of implementation strategies, including aspects of their delivery. In practice, this involved changing the delivery mode of implementation support strategies from phone call and email support, to website-based delivery. More than half (56%) of adaptations involved 'adding elements' for scale-up. Most adaptations were 'fidelity consistent' (95%). The main goals for adaptations were related to 'increasing the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility' (45%), 'decreasing the costs' (19%) and 'increasing adoption of the evidence-based practice' (19%). Adaptations were small to medium in size, with most proposed to have a positive (87%) or neutral (8%) effect on the effectiveness of the intervention, rather than negative (4%).
CONCLUSIONS
A large number of small, fidelity-consistent, adaptations were proposed for Play Active scale-up. Overall, the process of reporting adaptations was found to be feasible. To understand the impact of these adaptations, it will be important to re-evaluate implementation, effectiveness and process outcomes, at-scale.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37264433
doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01457-7
pii: 10.1186/s12966-023-01457-7
pmc: PMC10233970
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Implement Sci. 2007 Dec 09;2:42
pubmed: 18067681
Front Health Serv. 2021 Nov 17;1:719194
pubmed: 37007208
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Feb 7;8(1):31
pubmed: 35130976
Prev Sci. 2021 Oct;22(7):923-927
pubmed: 33948783
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Jan 24;3(1):5
pubmed: 35074020
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679
pubmed: 34344699
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e013318
pubmed: 28373250
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):
pubmed: 35206152
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 8;15(1):51
pubmed: 29884236
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34
pubmed: 35331260
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):306
pubmed: 35164729
Prev Sci. 2023 Jan;24(1):64-83
pubmed: 36198924
Health Promot Int. 2013 Sep;28(3):285-98
pubmed: 22241853
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Nutr Rev. 2022 Mar 10;80(4):962-979
pubmed: 34919715
Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36
pubmed: 33827716
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 7;16(1):102
pubmed: 31699095
Public Health. 2019 Dec;177:19-25
pubmed: 31494359
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 29;17(1):51
pubmed: 35906602
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Apr 20;20(1):46
pubmed: 37081560
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58
pubmed: 31171014
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 16;17(1):131
pubmed: 33066798
Obes Rev. 2019 Jul;20(7):964-982
pubmed: 30868745
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 20;19(1):106
pubmed: 35987776
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Jun 30;30(2):
pubmed: 32601656
J Phys Act Health. 2021 May 14;18(6):625-630
pubmed: 33984836
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):56
pubmed: 32690104
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):57
pubmed: 31171004
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):125
pubmed: 30257683
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 22;18(1):16
pubmed: 33482837
Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 09;6:102
pubmed: 29686983
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Nov;36(8):1326-1334
pubmed: 35612922
Health Educ Res. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):243-257
pubmed: 32632449