Distinct influence of inter- versus intra-trial feedback on the brain response to subsequent feedback: Evidence from event-related potentials.


Journal

Biological psychology
ISSN: 1873-6246
Titre abrégé: Biol Psychol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0375566

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 24 11 2022
revised: 10 05 2023
accepted: 30 05 2023
medline: 17 7 2023
pubmed: 3 6 2023
entrez: 2 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Substantial evidence indicates that feedback processing not only varies with the valence of feedback, but is also highly dependent on contextual factors. Even so, the influence of prior outcome history on current outcome evaluation is far from clear. To investigate this issue, we conducted two event-related potential (ERP) experiments using a modified gambling task whereby each trial was associated with two consequences. In experiment 1, two instances of feedback indicated participant performance on two dimensions of a single decision, within a trial. In experiment 2, participants made two decisions in each trial, and then received two instances of feedback. We examined the feedback-related negativity (FRN) as an index of feedback processing. When both instances of feedback were relevant to the same trial (intra-trial), the FRN to the second was affected by the valence of the immediately previous feedback: The FRN was amplified to losses following wins. This was observed in both experiment 1 and experiment 2. When two instances of feedback were relevant to two different trials (inter-trial), the effect of immediately previous feedback on the FRN was inconsistent. In experiment 1 there was no effect of feedback from the previous trial on the FRN. However, in Experiment 2 there was an effect of inter-trial feedback on the FRN that was opposite to the effect of intra-trial feedback: The FRN was amplified when losses followed losses. Taken together, the findings suggest that the neural systems involved in reward processing dynamically and continuously integrate preceding feedback for the evaluation of present feedback.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37268264
pii: S0301-0511(23)00113-8
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108596
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108596

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Zhurong Li (Z)

Brain Function and Psychological Science Research Center Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Ran Duan (R)

Brain Function and Psychological Science Research Center Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Yiming Guo (Y)

Brain Function and Psychological Science Research Center Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Peng Li (P)

Brain Function and Psychological Science Research Center Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: peng@szu.edu.cn.

Christopher M Warren (CM)

Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services Utah State University, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH