Correlation between the foot pressure index and the prevalence of plantar hyperkeratosis.

BACKGROUND

Plantar hyperkeratosis (HK) is a very prevalent foot lesion formed due to an alteration in the keratinisation process, thereby increasing keratynocites and accumulating multiple layers of the stratum corneum that leads to plantar pain. As foot shape and plantar pressures is related with their appearance, the aim of this study is to examine how foot posture and plantar pressure influence the appearance of this keratopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

On a sample of 400 subjects (201 men and 199 women), the plantar pressures were evaluated by the Footscan® platform in 10 zones. The clinical exploration consisted in the valuation of the Foot Posture Index (FPI), and the assessment of the appeerance (and location) or not of plantar calluses or hyperkeratosis.

RESULTS

6.3% of the feet presented a highly supinated FPI, 15.5% were supinated, 57.3% corresponded to neutral, 17.3% were pronated and 3.8% were highly pronated. The participants with HK on the hallux, on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 5th MTH or on the lateral heel had a significantly higher pressure index (p < 0.001), ranging from 24.3 to 44% higher than those with no such alteration. Of the highly pronated feet, 66.7% presented HK in the hallux, while 32.3% of the supinated feet and 60% of the highly supinated feet presented it beneath the first MTH.

CONCLUSION

Foot posture influences the appearance of HK, though its association with plantar pressures. The participants with HK presented a mean foot pressure that was 32.3% higher than in those with no such condition. These values can be considered predictive for the appearance of HK and should be indicative of the need for preventive treatment.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved either experimental animals or human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author and which has been configured to accept email from.