Alemtuzumab for multiple sclerosis.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 06 2023
05 06 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
05
06
2024
medline:
6
6
2023
pubmed:
5
6
2023
entrez:
5
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, T-cell-dependent, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies focus on treating and preventing exacerbations, and avoiding the progression of disability. At present, there is no treatment that is capable of safely and effectively reaching these objectives. Clinical trials suggest that alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, could be a promising option for MS. To evaluate the benefits and harms of alemtuzumab alone or associated with other treatments in people with any form of MS. We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 21 June 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with any subtype of MS comparing alemtuzumab alone or associated with other medications versus placebo; another active drug; or alemtuzumab in another dose, regimen, or duration. We used standard Cochrane methods. Our co-primary outcomes were 1. relapse-free survival, 2. sustained disease progression, and 3. number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event. Our secondary outcomes were 4. participants free of clinical disability, 5. quality of life, 6. change in disability, 7. fatigue, 8. new or enlarging lesions on resonance imaging, and 9. dropouts. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. We included three RCTs (1713 participants) comparing intravenous alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting MS. Participants were treatment-naive (two studies) or had experienced at least one relapse after interferon or glatiramer (one study). Alemtuzumab was given at doses of 12 mg/day or 24 mg/day for five days at months 0 and 12, or 24 mg/day for three days at months 12 and 24. Participants in the interferon beta-1a group received 44 μg three times weekly. Alemtuzumab 12 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.53; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.56; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02; 1 study, 224 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (mean difference [MD] -0.70, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.36; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain regarding the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14; 1 study, 224 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Alemtuzumab 24 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.69; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (MD -0.83, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.50; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 5. may reduce the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence). For quality of life, fatigue, and participants free of clinical disease activity, the studies either did not consider these outcomes or they used different measuring tools to those planned in this review. Compared with interferon beta-1a, alemtuzumab may improve relapse-free survival and sustained disease progression-free survival, and make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event for people with relapsing-remitting MS at 36 months. The certainty of the evidence for these results was very low to low.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, T-cell-dependent, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies focus on treating and preventing exacerbations, and avoiding the progression of disability. At present, there is no treatment that is capable of safely and effectively reaching these objectives. Clinical trials suggest that alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, could be a promising option for MS.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of alemtuzumab alone or associated with other treatments in people with any form of MS.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 21 June 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with any subtype of MS comparing alemtuzumab alone or associated with other medications versus placebo; another active drug; or alemtuzumab in another dose, regimen, or duration.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our co-primary outcomes were 1. relapse-free survival, 2. sustained disease progression, and 3. number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event. Our secondary outcomes were 4. participants free of clinical disability, 5. quality of life, 6. change in disability, 7. fatigue, 8. new or enlarging lesions on resonance imaging, and 9. dropouts. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three RCTs (1713 participants) comparing intravenous alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting MS. Participants were treatment-naive (two studies) or had experienced at least one relapse after interferon or glatiramer (one study). Alemtuzumab was given at doses of 12 mg/day or 24 mg/day for five days at months 0 and 12, or 24 mg/day for three days at months 12 and 24. Participants in the interferon beta-1a group received 44 μg three times weekly. Alemtuzumab 12 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.53; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.56; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02; 1 study, 224 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (mean difference [MD] -0.70, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.36; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain regarding the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14; 1 study, 224 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Alemtuzumab 24 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.69; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (MD -0.83, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.50; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 5. may reduce the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence). For quality of life, fatigue, and participants free of clinical disease activity, the studies either did not consider these outcomes or they used different measuring tools to those planned in this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Compared with interferon beta-1a, alemtuzumab may improve relapse-free survival and sustained disease progression-free survival, and make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event for people with relapsing-remitting MS at 36 months. The certainty of the evidence for these results was very low to low.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37272540
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011203.pub3
pmc: PMC10240561
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alemtuzumab
3A189DH42V
Interferon beta-1a
XRO4566Q4R
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00050778', 'NCT00530348', 'NCT00548405']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD011203Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;83(3):298-304
pubmed: 22056965
J Neurol. 2008 Feb;255(2):231-8
pubmed: 18283404
Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3
pubmed: 2803071
Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):907-11
pubmed: 8780061
Blood. 2002 May 15;99(10):3554-61
pubmed: 11986207
Eur J Immunol. 1991 Jul;21(7):1677-84
pubmed: 1711975
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 15;4:CD011203
pubmed: 27082500
Lancet. 2012 Nov 24;380(9856):1829-39
pubmed: 23122650
Blood. 1993 Aug 1;82(3):807-12
pubmed: 7687895
Neurology. 2012 Apr 3;78(14):1069-78
pubmed: 22442431
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Sep 29;360(1461):1707-11
pubmed: 16147535
Mult Scler. 2017 Sep;23(10):1367-1376
pubmed: 27885061
Neurology. 2016 Nov 8;87(19):1985-1992
pubmed: 27733571
Lancet. 1999 Nov 13;354(9191):1691-5
pubmed: 10568572
Qual Life Res. 1995 Jun;4(3):187-206
pubmed: 7613530
Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227-31
pubmed: 6847134
Lancet. 2012 Nov 24;380(9856):1819-28
pubmed: 23122652
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;(9):CD011381
pubmed: 26384035
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39416
pubmed: 22761788
Neurology. 2016 Oct 04;87(14):1464-1472
pubmed: 27590291
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr 15;363:188-94
pubmed: 27000249
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1786-801
pubmed: 18946064
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD003208
pubmed: 15106195
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan;99(1):80-9
pubmed: 24170099
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Apr;10(4):338-48
pubmed: 21397567
Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52
pubmed: 6685237
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7
pubmed: 11456302
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 27;11:CD010968
pubmed: 29178444
Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):573-9
pubmed: 21795656
Mult Scler. 1999 Aug;5(4):251-9
pubmed: 10467384
Ann Neurol. 1999 Sep;46(3):296-304
pubmed: 10482259
Ann Neurol. 1999 Aug;46(2):197-206
pubmed: 10443885
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;67(2):148-52
pubmed: 10406979
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;277 Suppl 1:S42-5
pubmed: 19200866
J Neurol. 2006 Jan;253(1):98-108
pubmed: 16044212
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):938-52
pubmed: 11006371
Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:189624
pubmed: 23555057
Immunotherapy. 2010 Nov;2(6):783-90
pubmed: 21091110
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2012 Apr;60(2):99-106
pubmed: 22307362
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 06;(6):CD008933
pubmed: 23744561
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Dec;42(12):1539-44
pubmed: 12949252
Pract Neurol. 2015 Aug;15(4):273-9
pubmed: 26101071