Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.
Humans
Adalimumab
/ adverse effects
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
/ adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ therapeutic use
Pharmacovigilance
Infliximab
/ adverse effects
Etanercept
/ adverse effects
Immunologic Factors
Arthritis, Psoriatic
/ drug therapy
Psoriasis
/ drug therapy
Journal
BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy
ISSN: 1179-190X
Titre abrégé: BioDrugs
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9705305
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
accepted:
01
05
2023
medline:
17
8
2023
pubmed:
6
6
2023
entrez:
6
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "Product substitution issue (PT)" for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy. This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.
METHODS
METHODS
We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "Product substitution issue (PT)" for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37278971
doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8
pii: 10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Infliximab
B72HH48FLU
Etanercept
OP401G7OJC
Immunologic Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
699-707Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Références
European Medicines Agency. Biosimilar medicines: overview. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/biosimilar-medicines-overview . Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Biosimilar product information. FDA; 2022. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-product-information . Accessed 2 Dec 2022
Jourdain H, Hoisnard L, Sbidian E, Zureik M. TNF-alpha inhibitors biosimilar use in France: a nationwide population-based study using the French National Health Data System. Sci Rep. 2022;12:19569.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24050-7
pubmed: 36380105
pmcid: 9666557
Afzali A, Furtner D, Melsheimer R, Molloy PJ. The automatic substitution of biosimilars: definitions of interchangeability are not interchangeable. Adv Ther. 2021;38:2077–93.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01688-9
pubmed: 33745111
pmcid: 8107170
Biosimilars in the EU: information guide for healthcare professionals. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/leaflet/biosimilars-eu-information-guide-healthcareprofessionals_en.pdf Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Mysler E, Azevedo VF, Danese S, Alvarez D, Iikuni N, Ingram B, et al. Biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching: what is the rationale and current experience? Drugs. 2021;81:1859–79.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01610-1
pubmed: 34705255
pmcid: 8578069
Salam T, Duhig A, Patel AA, Cameron A, Voelker J, Bookhart B, et al. Physicians’ perspectives regarding non-medical switching of prescription medications: results of an internet e-survey. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0225867.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225867
pubmed: 31923201
pmcid: 6953849
Schellekens H. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: clinical implications and future prospects. Clin Ther. 2002;24:1720–40 (discussion 1719).
doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(02)80075-3
pubmed: 12501870
Ruiz-Argüello MB, Maguregui A, Ruiz Del Agua A, Pascual-Salcedo D, Martínez-Feito A, Jurado T, et al. Antibodies to infliximab in Remicade-treated rheumatic patients show identical reactivity towards biosimilars. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1693–6.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208684
pubmed: 26965981
Lauret A, Moltó A, Abitbol V, Gutermann L, Conort O, Chast F, et al. Effects of successive switches to different biosimilars infliximab on immunogenicity in chronic inflammatory diseases in daily clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:1449–56.
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.02.007
pubmed: 32268935
Schmitz EMH, Boekema PJ, Straathof JWA, van Renswouw DC, Brunsveld L, Scharnhorst V, et al. Switching from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a 12-month multicentre observational prospective cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47:356–63.
doi: 10.1111/apt.14453
pubmed: 29205444
Avouac J, Moltó A, Abitbol V, Etcheto A, Salcion A, Gutermann L, et al. Systematic switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory chronic diseases in daily clinical practice: the experience of Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;47:741–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.10.002
pubmed: 29102156
Gentileschi S, Barreca C, Bellisai F, Biasi G, Brizi MG, De Stefano R, et al. Switch from infliximab to infliximab biosimilar: efficacy and safety in a cohort of patients with different rheumatic diseases. Response to: Nikiphorou E, Kautiainen H, Hannonen P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1677–83 (Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16:1311–2).
Scherlinger M, Germain V, Labadie C, Barnetche T, Truchetet M-E, Bannwarth B, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in real-life: the weight of patient acceptance. Jt Bone Spine. 2018;85:561–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.10.003
Bakalos G, Zintzaras E. Drug discontinuation in studies including a switch from an originator to a biosimilar monoclonal antibody: a systematic literature review. Clin Ther. 2019;41:155-73.e13.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.11.002
pubmed: 30551802
Barbier L, Ebbers HC, Declerck P, Simoens S, Vulto AG, Huys I. The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of switching between reference biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars: a systematic review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020;108:734–55.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1836
pubmed: 32236956
pmcid: 7540323
Tweehuysen L, van den Bemt BJF, van Ingen IL, de Jong AJL, van der Laan WH, van den Hoogen FHJ, et al. Subjective complaints as the main reason for biosimilar discontinuation after open-label transition from reference infliximab to biosimilar infliximab. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:60–8.
doi: 10.1002/art.40324
pubmed: 29045077
Kristensen LE, Alten R, Puig L, Philipp S, Kvien TK, Mangues MA, et al. Non-pharmacological effects in switching medication: the nocebo effect in switching from originator to biosimilar agent. BioDrugs. 2018;32:397–404.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0306-1
pubmed: 30269270
pmcid: 6182448
WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment, 2023. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2023_guidelines_web.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2022
Fusaroli M, Raschi E, Gatti M, De Ponti F, Poluzzi E. Development of a network-based signal detection tool: the COVID-19 Adversome in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.740707 . Accessed 8 Dec 2022.
Park JP, Jung B, Park HK, Shin D, Jung JA, Ghil J, et al. Interchangeability for biologics is a legal distinction in the USA, not a clinical one. BioDrugs. 2022;36:431–6.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00538-6
pubmed: 35696067
pmcid: 9190447
Colloca L, Barsky AJ. Placebo and nocebo effects. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:554–61.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805
pubmed: 32023375
Howard JP, Wood FA, Finegold JA, Nowbar AN, Thompson DM, Arnold AD, et al. Side effect patterns in a crossover trial of statin, placebo, and no treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1210–22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.022
pubmed: 34531021
pmcid: 8453640
Casassus B. Risks of reformulation: French patients complain after Merck modifies levothyroxine pills. BMJ. 2018;360: k714.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k714
pubmed: 29453193
Fleischmann R, Jairath V, Mysler E, Nicholls D, Declerck P. Nonmedical switching from originators to biosimilars: does the nocebo effect explain treatment failures and adverse events in rheumatology and gastroenterology? Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7:35–64.
doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-00190-7
pubmed: 31950442
pmcid: 7021884
Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, Lorentzen M, Bolstad N, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2304–16.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30068-5
pubmed: 28502609
Khan SU, Kleiman NS. Statin related muscle symptoms: is it time to move on. BMJ. 2022;379: o2939.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2939
pubmed: 36593582
Cohen HP, Blauvelt A, Rifkin RM, Danese S, Gokhale SB, Woollett G. Switching reference medicines to biosimilars: a systematic literature review of clinical outcomes. Drugs. 2018;78:463–78.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0881-y
pubmed: 29500555
pmcid: 5854749
Cohen HP, Hachaichi S, Bodenmueller W, Kvien TK, Danese S, Blauvelt A. Switching from one biosimilar to another biosimilar of the same reference biologic: a systematic review of studies. BioDrugs. 2022;36:625–37.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00546-6
pubmed: 35881304
pmcid: 9485085
Dutt K, Srinivasan A, Van Langenberg D. The nocebo effect in a non-medical switching program from originator to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. BioDrugs. 2022;36:639–44.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00548-4
pubmed: 35960446
Colloca L, Panaccione R, Murphy TK. The clinical implications of nocebo effects for biosimilar therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01372 . Accessed 22 Dec 2022.
Faasse K, Martin LR. The power of labeling in nocebo effects. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:379–406.
doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.016
pubmed: 30146055
Svensberg K, Nordeng H, Gaffari S, Faasse K, Horne R, Lupattelli A. Perceived sensitivity to medicines: a study among chronic medicine users in Norway. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41:804–12.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00826-2
pubmed: 31028593
Bennett CL, Schoen MW, Hoque S, Witherspoon BJ, Aboulafia DM, Hwang CS, et al. Improving oncology biosimilar launches in the EU, the USA, and Japan: an updated policy review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e575–88.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30485-X
pubmed: 33271114
Petit J, Antignac M, Poilverd R-M, Baratto R, Darthout S, Desouches S, et al. Multidisciplinary team intervention to reduce the nocebo effect when switching from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar. RMD Open. 2021;7: e001396.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001396
pubmed: 33495387
pmcid: 7839879
Rupert DJ, Jordan AM, Ziemian MA, Brown RM, Fleming NS, Lefebvre RC. Understanding US physician and pharmacist attitudes toward biosimilar products: a qualitative study. BioDrugs. 2022;36:645–55.
doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00545-7
pubmed: 35962911