Profiling leadership: Attitudes, knowledge and training in the biological sciences.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
15
12
2022
accepted:
24
05
2023
medline:
9
6
2023
pubmed:
7
6
2023
entrez:
7
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The development and practice of good leadership skills (distinct from management skills) enhances both an individual's career development, and their organization. However, universities are known to present unique issues around the development, and practice, of good leadership. Good leadership skills should be considered essential for university staff who train (and mentor) staff or students. Currently, there is no clear evidence that staff in the biological (life) sciences undergo formal (routine) leadership skills training (or appraisal). Furthermore, what leadership training this group needs, or wants, is unknown. A questionnaire was designed to explore leadership dimensions (roles, training, perceptions, and attitudes), and incorporated the Leadership Attitudes and Belief scale (LABS) instrument. Including LABS allows evaluation of leadership attitudes as either Systemic (individual responsibility) or Hierarchical (chain-of-command). Self-selecting biological science academics and staff were recruited using an online survey. Analysis focused on academic staff (lecturer/Assistant professor, and above), and explored the relationship of leadership dimensions with key categories (career stage, gender, age, role, and professional experience). Staff were found to be knowledgeable about what leadership is, but strongly desire formal training in leadership skills and practice. Importantly, staff did not have access to specific leadership training (but did have access to management training), but felt strongly that gaining leadership skills would improve their professional skill set. Analysis found that academics in the biological sciences were oriented towards Systemic leadership, a more collective and supportive approach. It was clear that while good leadership skills are highly valued by academic staff, in practice these skills are underprovided in the biological sciences workplace. This work provides a profile, and benchmark, of leadership (current skills, and desired needs) in the biological sciences. These results provide evidence for the need to embed specific leadership skills training into professional development (and teaching) programmes in the biological sciences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37285357
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286826
pii: PONE-D-22-34329
pmc: PMC10246786
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286826Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 James A. L. Brown. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declares that no competing interests exist.
Références
Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):244-50
pubmed: 18825566
Nature. 2016 Oct 26;538(7626):444
pubmed: 27786225
Am J Med. 2006 Jul;119(7):617-21
pubmed: 16828636
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 2;20(1):175
pubmed: 32487056
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):710-23
pubmed: 23524921
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 08;6(9):e012090
pubmed: 27609850
Mcgill J Med. 2006 Jan;9(1):68-73
pubmed: 19529813
Am J Surg. 2013 Nov;206(5):727-31
pubmed: 24011565
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):12
pubmed: 28222735
Med J Aust. 2004 Dec 6-20;181(11-12):652-4
pubmed: 15588200
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0229446
pubmed: 32251463
Elife. 2021 Jan 11;10:
pubmed: 33423739
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Apr;10(2):134-148
pubmed: 29686751