Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2023
01 Jun 2023
Historique:
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
8
6
2023
entrez:
8
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several recent US Supreme Court rulings have drawn criticism from the medical community, but their health consequences have not been quantitatively evaluated. To model health outcomes associated with 3 Supreme Court rulings in 2022 that invalidated workplace COVID-19 vaccine or mask-and-test requirements, voided state handgun-carry restrictions, and revoked the constitutional right to abortion. This decision analytical modeling study estimated outcomes associated with 3 Supreme Court rulings in 2022: (1) National Federation of Independent Business v Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which invalidated COVID-19 workplace protections; (2) New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc v Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police (Bruen), which voided state laws restricting handgun carry; and (3) Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs), which revoked the constitutional right to abortion. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2022, to April 7, 2023. For the OSHA ruling, multiple data sources were used to calculate deaths attributable to COVID-19 among unvaccinated workers from January 4 to May 28, 2022, and the share of these deaths that would have been prevented by the voided protections. To model the Bruen decision, published estimates of the consequences of right-to-carry laws were applied to 2020 firearm-related deaths (and injuries) in 7 affected jurisdictions. For the Dobbs ruling, the model assessed unwanted pregnancy continuations, resulting from the change in distance to the closest abortion facility, and then excess deaths (and peripartum complications) from forcing these unwanted pregnancies to term. The decision model projected that the OSHA decision was associated with 1402 additional COVID-19 deaths (and 22 830 hospitalizations) in early 2022. In addition, the model projected that 152 additional firearm-related deaths (and 377 nonfatal injuries) annually will result from the Bruen decision. Finally, the model projected that 30 440 fewer abortions will occur annually due to current abortion bans stemming from Dobbs, with 76 612 fewer abortions if states at high risk for such bans also were to ban the procedure; these bans will be associated with an estimated 6 to 15 additional pregnancy-related deaths each year, respectively, and hundreds of additional cases of peripartum morbidity. These findings suggest that outcomes from 3 Supreme Court decisions in 2022 could lead to substantial harms to public health, including nearly 3000 excess deaths (and possibly many more) over a decade.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37289459
pii: 2805787
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15578
pmc: PMC10251209
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2315578Références
Demography. 2021 Dec 1;58(6):2019-2028
pubmed: 34693444
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Oct 7;3(10):e223810
pubmed: 36306119
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(10):e1-e9
pubmed: 32816550
Am J Public Health. 2022 Sep;112(9):1290-1296
pubmed: 35969820
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):14906-14910
pubmed: 32541042
Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7927):460-462
pubmed: 36104405
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 25;71(12):459-465
pubmed: 35324878
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;227(4):648-650.e1
pubmed: 35803323
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):237-244
pubmed: 33284327
JAMA. 2022 Sep 27;328(12):1187-1188
pubmed: 36166019
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 12;382(11):1029-1040
pubmed: 32160664
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373
pubmed: 31376381
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 28;387(4):367-368
pubmed: 35748912
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):e119-e122
pubmed: 31567319
Lancet. 2022 Aug 13;400(10351):535-538
pubmed: 35817078
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 6;387(14):1245-1247
pubmed: 36193944
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Dec;41(6):1061-1081
pubmed: 27531938
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):558.e1-558.e11
pubmed: 34736914
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1:CD006207
pubmed: 36715243
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Mar;42(3):357-365
pubmed: 36877900
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 29;3(7):e222363
pubmed: 35983581
JAMA. 2022 Feb 22;327(8):713-714
pubmed: 35061000
JAMA. 2022 Feb 22;327(8):706-708
pubmed: 35061013