Molecular mechanisms of muscle contraction: A historical perspective.

Actin Mathematical models of contraction Myosin Passive force enhancement Residual force depression Residual force enhancement Skeletal muscle Theories of contraction Titin

Journal

Journal of biomechanics
ISSN: 1873-2380
Titre abrégé: J Biomech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0157375

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
received: 22 05 2023
accepted: 22 05 2023
medline: 15 6 2023
pubmed: 9 6 2023
entrez: 8 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Studies of muscle structure and function can be traced to at least 2,000 years ago. However, the modern era of muscle contraction mechanisms started in the 1950s with the classic works by AF Huxley and HE Huxley, both born in the United Kingdom, but not related and working independently. HE Huxley was the first to suggest that muscle contraction occurred through the sliding of two sets of filamentous structures (actin or thin filaments and myosin or thick filaments). AF Huxley then developed a biologically inspired mathematical model suggesting a possible molecular mechanism of how this sliding of actin and myosin might take place. This model then evolved from a two-state to a multi-state model of myosin-actin interactions, and from one that suggested a linear motor causing the sliding to a rotating motor. This model, the cross-bridge model of muscle contraction, is still widely used in biomechanics, and even the more sophisticated cross-bridge models of today still contain many of the features originally proposed by AF Huxley. In 2002, we discovered a hitherto unknown property of muscle contraction that suggested the involvement of passive structures in active force production, the so-called passive force enhancement. It was quickly revealed that this passive force enhancement was caused by the filamentous protein titin, and the three-filament (actin, myosin, and titin) sarcomere model of muscle contraction evolved. There are many suggestions of how these three proteins interact to cause contraction and produce active force, and one such suggestion is described here, but the molecular details of this proposed mechanism still need careful evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37290181
pii: S0021-9290(23)00228-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111659
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Connectin 0
Actins 0
Myosins EC 3.6.4.1

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111659

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Walter Herzog (W)

Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: wherzog@ucalgary.ca.

Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp (G)

FH JOANNEUM, Department of Engineering, University of Applied Science, Graz, Austria.

Articles similaires

Cerebrospinal Fluid Animals Liver Glymphatic System Spinal Cord
Animals Humans Sarcomeres Muscle Proteins Carrier Proteins
Humans Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Male Cerebellum Evoked Potentials, Motor
Animals Humans Mice Neoplasms Tumor Microenvironment

Classifications MeSH