Experiences of parents and caretakers going through the consent process to perform minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) on their deceased children in Quelimane, Mozambique: A qualitative study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
22
11
2022
accepted:
23
05
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
9
6
2023
entrez:
9
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Mozambique, the Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA) Program implemented a child mortality surveillance to strengthen vital events registration (pregnancies, births, and deaths) and investigate causes of death using verbal autopsies. In Quelimane district, in addition to the abovementioned cause of death determination approaches, minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) was performed on deceased children <5years of age. This study focused on understanding deceased children parents' and caretakers' experiences of the consent process to perform MITS in order to contribute to the improvement of approaches to cause of death investigation and inform efforts to maximize acceptability of mortality surveillance activities. A qualitative study was conducted in six urban and semi-urban communities in Quelimane district. A total of 40 semi-structured interviews with family members of deceased children and 50 non-participant observations of the consent process were conducted to explore their experience with informed consent request to perform MITS on their child. Data analysis of the interviews and observations was thematic, being initially deductive (predetermined codes) followed by the generation of new codes according to the data (inductive).The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines for reporting qualitative studies were performed. Although most participants consented to the performance of MITS on their deceased child, some stated they had not fully understood the MITS procedure despite the informed consent process due to unclear information and their state of mind after their loss. Consenting to MITS and doing so with family members disagreeing were also identified as stress-enhancing factors. Participants also described dissatisfaction of family members, resulting from the condition of the body delivered after tissue collection. In addition, the waiting time to receive the body and resulting delays for the funeral were considered additional factors that may increase stress and compromise the acceptability of MITS. Family experiences were influenced by operational and logistical issues linked to the procedure itself and by it being in tension with social and cultural issues, which caused stress and discontentment on parents and caretakers of deceased children. The main factors that contributed to the experience of going through the MITS process were the state of mind after the death, complex decision making processes within the family, washing of the body for purification after MITS and seepage, and limited understanding of consent for MITS. When requesting consent for MITS, emphasis should be placed on transmitting clear and understandable information about MITS procedures to participants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In Mozambique, the Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA) Program implemented a child mortality surveillance to strengthen vital events registration (pregnancies, births, and deaths) and investigate causes of death using verbal autopsies. In Quelimane district, in addition to the abovementioned cause of death determination approaches, minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) was performed on deceased children <5years of age. This study focused on understanding deceased children parents' and caretakers' experiences of the consent process to perform MITS in order to contribute to the improvement of approaches to cause of death investigation and inform efforts to maximize acceptability of mortality surveillance activities.
METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted in six urban and semi-urban communities in Quelimane district. A total of 40 semi-structured interviews with family members of deceased children and 50 non-participant observations of the consent process were conducted to explore their experience with informed consent request to perform MITS on their child. Data analysis of the interviews and observations was thematic, being initially deductive (predetermined codes) followed by the generation of new codes according to the data (inductive).The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines for reporting qualitative studies were performed.
FINDINGS
Although most participants consented to the performance of MITS on their deceased child, some stated they had not fully understood the MITS procedure despite the informed consent process due to unclear information and their state of mind after their loss. Consenting to MITS and doing so with family members disagreeing were also identified as stress-enhancing factors. Participants also described dissatisfaction of family members, resulting from the condition of the body delivered after tissue collection. In addition, the waiting time to receive the body and resulting delays for the funeral were considered additional factors that may increase stress and compromise the acceptability of MITS.
CONCLUSION
Family experiences were influenced by operational and logistical issues linked to the procedure itself and by it being in tension with social and cultural issues, which caused stress and discontentment on parents and caretakers of deceased children. The main factors that contributed to the experience of going through the MITS process were the state of mind after the death, complex decision making processes within the family, washing of the body for purification after MITS and seepage, and limited understanding of consent for MITS. When requesting consent for MITS, emphasis should be placed on transmitting clear and understandable information about MITS procedures to participants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37294780
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286785
pii: PONE-D-22-32148
pmc: PMC10256146
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286785Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Magaço et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Apr 10;108(5_Suppl):56-65
pubmed: 37037431
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Oct 18;28:150
pubmed: 29541298
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S280-S290
pubmed: 31598665
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002317
pubmed: 28632739
BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Jun 13;12:10
pubmed: 21668979
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 15;73(Suppl_5):S422-S429
pubmed: 34910175
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259621
pubmed: 34748582
Reprod Health. 2019 May 10;16(1):53
pubmed: 31077244
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 9;16(1):3
pubmed: 30626421
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 20;14(6):e1002318
pubmed: 28632735
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Mar;57(3):378-9
pubmed: 21402974
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):101-109
pubmed: 32659031
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S262-S273
pubmed: 31598664
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Nov 17;21(1):513
pubmed: 34784903
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 9;69(Suppl 4):S291-S301
pubmed: 31598657
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002173
pubmed: 27875535
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 22;13(11):e1002172
pubmed: 27875532
Reprod Health. 2021 Aug 4;18(1):168
pubmed: 34348749
Virchows Arch. 2019 Nov;475(5):649-658
pubmed: 31201504
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e35-e36
pubmed: 31839138
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0244552
pubmed: 33507902
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Mar 12;4(6):353-61
pubmed: 26029894
Pediatr Rev. 2016 Jul;37(7):279-91
pubmed: 27368359