A randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term efficacy of a single-administration intramuscular injection with the fixed combination of thiocolchicoside-diclofenac versus diclofenac monotherapy in patients with acute moderate-to-severe low back pain.
Acute, Low back pain
Diclofenac
NSAID
Thiocolchicoside
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2023
10 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
08
09
2022
accepted:
01
06
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
11
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-specific acute low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem that may be accompanied by muscle spasm and decreased mobility. The combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants represents an advantageous therapeutic option, however, available data on their combined use are conflicting. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-parallel-group trial assessed the efficacy of a single intramuscular (IM) injection of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) diclofenac (75 mg)-thiocolchicoside (4 mg/4 ml) product (test treatment) compared to diclofenac (75 mg/3 ml) alone (reference treatment) for the symptomatic relief of acute LBP. Tolerability and safety were also assessed as secondary variables. One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled (safety population) and randomly allocated to the combination or single-agent regimen. Pain intensity and muscle spasm, assessed respectively by the patient-reported visual analogue scale and investigator-performed finger-to-floor distance test, were determined prior to the injection as well as 1 and 3 h post-injection in 123 patients (per-protocol population). The patients were blinded to treatment. Safety was assessed up to 24 h post-injection. The test treatment was superior in both alleviating the pain intensity and reducing the finger-to-floor distance at both 1 (p < 0.01 and p = 0.023 respectively) and 3 h post-injection (p < 0.01). A higher percentage of patients experienced > 30% reduction in pain intensity at 1 and 3 h with the test treatment (p = 0.037 and p < 0.01 respectively). The corresponding VAS (SD) scores for the test treatment group were at baseline, 1 and 3 h post-injection 72.03 (± 11.72), 45.37 (± 16.28) and 31.56 (± 15.08) respectively and for the reference treatment group 65.20 (± 12.16), 48.98 (± 18.76) and 44.52 (± 17.33) respectively. No adverse effects were reported with the combination treatment, whereas two patients treated with diclofenac reported dizziness. The FDC treatment is an effective and well-tolerated option for the symptomatic treatment of LBP. Clinical and patient-reported assessments confirmed that a single IM injection of FDC diclofenac-thiocolchicoside was more effective than diclofenac alone in conferring rapid and sustained improvement in mobility and pain intensity. EudraCT No: 2017-004530-29 Available at https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/ Registered 04 Dec 2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Non-specific acute low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem that may be accompanied by muscle spasm and decreased mobility. The combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants represents an advantageous therapeutic option, however, available data on their combined use are conflicting. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-parallel-group trial assessed the efficacy of a single intramuscular (IM) injection of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) diclofenac (75 mg)-thiocolchicoside (4 mg/4 ml) product (test treatment) compared to diclofenac (75 mg/3 ml) alone (reference treatment) for the symptomatic relief of acute LBP. Tolerability and safety were also assessed as secondary variables.
METHODS
METHODS
One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled (safety population) and randomly allocated to the combination or single-agent regimen. Pain intensity and muscle spasm, assessed respectively by the patient-reported visual analogue scale and investigator-performed finger-to-floor distance test, were determined prior to the injection as well as 1 and 3 h post-injection in 123 patients (per-protocol population). The patients were blinded to treatment. Safety was assessed up to 24 h post-injection.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The test treatment was superior in both alleviating the pain intensity and reducing the finger-to-floor distance at both 1 (p < 0.01 and p = 0.023 respectively) and 3 h post-injection (p < 0.01). A higher percentage of patients experienced > 30% reduction in pain intensity at 1 and 3 h with the test treatment (p = 0.037 and p < 0.01 respectively). The corresponding VAS (SD) scores for the test treatment group were at baseline, 1 and 3 h post-injection 72.03 (± 11.72), 45.37 (± 16.28) and 31.56 (± 15.08) respectively and for the reference treatment group 65.20 (± 12.16), 48.98 (± 18.76) and 44.52 (± 17.33) respectively. No adverse effects were reported with the combination treatment, whereas two patients treated with diclofenac reported dizziness.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The FDC treatment is an effective and well-tolerated option for the symptomatic treatment of LBP. Clinical and patient-reported assessments confirmed that a single IM injection of FDC diclofenac-thiocolchicoside was more effective than diclofenac alone in conferring rapid and sustained improvement in mobility and pain intensity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
EudraCT No: 2017-004530-29 Available at https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/ Registered 04 Dec 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37301824
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06599-0
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06599-0
pmc: PMC10257820
doi:
Substances chimiques
Diclofenac
144O8QL0L1
thiocolchicoside
T1X8S697GT
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
476Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Asian Spine J. 2012 Jun;6(2):115-22
pubmed: 22708015
BMJ. 2003 Aug 9;327(7410):323
pubmed: 12907487
Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):34-41
pubmed: 25007754
BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):185
pubmed: 10406763
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;12(2):145-157
pubmed: 30618319
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016 Apr;6(2):199-206
pubmed: 27190772
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(8):533-43
pubmed: 17638394
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1687-1693
pubmed: 32838578
Eur J Pain. 2017 Feb;21(2):228-237
pubmed: 27329976
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 16;4:CD013581
pubmed: 32297973
J Pain. 2019 Mar;20(3):245-263
pubmed: 30099210
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4
pubmed: 18165753
BMJ. 2006 Jun 17;332(7555):1430-4
pubmed: 16777886
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74
pubmed: 24665116
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2020 Nov 16;12:221-228
pubmed: 33235514
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):512-520
pubmed: 30955985
Pain Ther. 2019 Jun;8(1):121-132
pubmed: 30652262
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37
pubmed: 22231424
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80
pubmed: 26501533
J Pain Res. 2012;5:579-90
pubmed: 23271922
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Feb 21;15:50
pubmed: 24559519
Pain Med. 2011 Nov;12 Suppl 4:S119-27
pubmed: 22085373
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Oct;54(5):654-662
pubmed: 29265793
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD004252
pubmed: 12804507
BMJ. 2021 Jul 7;374:n1446
pubmed: 34233900
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Mar;67(3):403-10
pubmed: 25665074
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;71(3):348-356.e5
pubmed: 29089169
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1986 May;1(2):102-9
pubmed: 23906363
Clin Ther. 2002 Jan;24(1):87-99
pubmed: 11833838
Clin Ther. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):125-31
pubmed: 2141299
Joint Bone Spine. 2003 Sep;70(5):356-61
pubmed: 14563464