Antivirals for prevention of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission in human immunodeficiency virus positive pregnant women co-infected with hepatitis B virus.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 06 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 12 06 2024
medline: 14 6 2023
pubmed: 12 6 2023
entrez: 12 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection promotes an aggressive disease course of HBV infection. In the only available non-Cochrane systematic review on antiviral therapy during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV, none of the women studied had HBV-HIV co-infection but were either HBV- or HIV-seropositive. Treatment of HBV alone may develop HIV-strains that are resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Accordingly, co-treatment of the HIV infection is recommended. To evaluate the benefits and harms of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus placebo, tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen either alone or in combination with HBV for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV in HIV-positive pregnant women co-infected with HBV. We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS (Bireme), Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (Web of Science) on 30 January 2023. We manually searched the reference lists of included trials, searched on-line trial registries, and contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies for any further potential trials. We aimed to include randomised clinical trials comparing tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (anti-HIV regimen with lopinavir-ritonavir therapy, or any other antiviral therapy, and two drugs with activity against HBV, specifically, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), plus lamivudine or emtricitabine) with placebo alone, or tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen (zidovudine, lamivudine, telbivudine, emtricitabine, entecavir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or any other antiviral therapy) either alone or in combination with at least two other antivirals. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes included all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) (before delivery), maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. We used RevMan Web to carry out analyses and presented results, where feasible, using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We performed sensitivity analysis. We assessed risk of bias using predefined domains, assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and presented outcome results in a summary of findings table. Five completed trials were included, of which four trials contributed data to one or more of the outcomes. They included a total of 533 participants randomised to tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (196 participants) versus control (337 participants). The control groups received non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimens either as zidovudine alone (three trials) or as a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir (five trials). None of the trials used placebo or tenofovir alone. All trials were at unclear risk of bias. Four trials used intention-to-treat analyses. In the remaining trial, two participants in the intervention group and two in the control group were lost to follow-up. However, the outcomes of these four participants were not described. Tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control We are very uncertain about the effect of a tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control on all-cause infant mortality (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.72 to 6.96; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence); proportion of infants with serious adverse events (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.43; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.32; participants = 262; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on the proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission and all-cause maternal mortality. We are also very uncertain about the effect of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus control on the proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.68; participants = 31; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (before delivery) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; participants = 169; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. All trials received support from industry. We do not know what the effects of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens are on all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA before delivery because the certainty of evidence was very low. Only one or two trials, with insufficient power, contributed data for analyses. We lack randomised clinical trials at low risk of systematic and random errors, and fully reporting all-cause infant mortality, serious adverse events and reporting on clinical and laboratory outcomes, such as infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion before delivery and maternal adverse events not considered serious.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection promotes an aggressive disease course of HBV infection. In the only available non-Cochrane systematic review on antiviral therapy during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV, none of the women studied had HBV-HIV co-infection but were either HBV- or HIV-seropositive. Treatment of HBV alone may develop HIV-strains that are resistant to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Accordingly, co-treatment of the HIV infection is recommended.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus placebo, tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen either alone or in combination with HBV for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV in HIV-positive pregnant women co-infected with HBV.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS (Bireme), Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (Web of Science) on 30 January 2023. We manually searched the reference lists of included trials, searched on-line trial registries, and contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies for any further potential trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We aimed to include randomised clinical trials comparing tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (anti-HIV regimen with lopinavir-ritonavir therapy, or any other antiviral therapy, and two drugs with activity against HBV, specifically, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), plus lamivudine or emtricitabine) with placebo alone, or tenofovir alone, or non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimen (zidovudine, lamivudine, telbivudine, emtricitabine, entecavir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or any other antiviral therapy) either alone or in combination with at least two other antivirals.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes included all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) (before delivery), maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. We used RevMan Web to carry out analyses and presented results, where feasible, using a random-effects model and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We performed sensitivity analysis. We assessed risk of bias using predefined domains, assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, controlled risk of random errors with Trial Sequential Analysis, and presented outcome results in a summary of findings table.
MAIN RESULTS
Five completed trials were included, of which four trials contributed data to one or more of the outcomes. They included a total of 533 participants randomised to tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens (196 participants) versus control (337 participants). The control groups received non-tenofovir-based antiviral regimens either as zidovudine alone (three trials) or as a combination of zidovudine, lamivudine and lopinavir-ritonavir (five trials). None of the trials used placebo or tenofovir alone. All trials were at unclear risk of bias. Four trials used intention-to-treat analyses. In the remaining trial, two participants in the intervention group and two in the control group were lost to follow-up. However, the outcomes of these four participants were not described. Tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control We are very uncertain about the effect of a tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimen versus control on all-cause infant mortality (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.72 to 6.96; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence); proportion of infants with serious adverse events (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.43; participants = 132; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.32; participants = 262; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on the proportion of infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission and all-cause maternal mortality. We are also very uncertain about the effect of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens versus control on the proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.68; participants = 31; trials = 1; very low-certainty evidence), and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA (before delivery) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; participants = 169; trials = 2; very low-certainty evidence). No trial reported data on maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion (before delivery) and maternal adverse events not considered serious. All trials received support from industry.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We do not know what the effects of tenofovir-based antiviral combination regimens are on all-cause infant mortality, proportion of infants with serious adverse events and proportion of mothers with serious adverse events, proportion of infants with adverse events not considered serious, and proportion of mothers with detectable HBV DNA before delivery because the certainty of evidence was very low. Only one or two trials, with insufficient power, contributed data for analyses. We lack randomised clinical trials at low risk of systematic and random errors, and fully reporting all-cause infant mortality, serious adverse events and reporting on clinical and laboratory outcomes, such as infants with HBV mother-to-child transmission, all-cause maternal mortality, maternal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to HBe-antibody seroconversion before delivery and maternal adverse events not considered serious.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37306558
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013653.pub2
pmc: PMC10259198
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antiviral Agents 0
DNA, Viral 0
Emtricitabine G70B4ETF4S
Hepatitis B e Antigens 0
Lamivudine 2T8Q726O95
Lopinavir 2494G1JF75
Ritonavir O3J8G9O825
Tenofovir 99YXE507IL
Zidovudine 4B9XT59T7S

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD013653

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Mar 15;32(6):963-9
pubmed: 11247719
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):587
pubmed: 28836955
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15514
pubmed: 30341345
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):39
pubmed: 28264661
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172222
pubmed: 28783807
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Hepatology. 2016 Jan;63(1):319-33
pubmed: 26565396
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 May;146(7):920-930
pubmed: 29636119
JAMA. 2022 Dec 13;328(22):2252-2264
pubmed: 36511921
Int J MCH AIDS. 2019;8(2):131-137
pubmed: 31824751
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2020 Apr;16(4):333-342
pubmed: 32125906
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 09;5:CD012069
pubmed: 29744873
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2010 Sep;6(9):570-8
pubmed: 21088746
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 11;2:CD008545
pubmed: 28188612
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jan;21(1):35
pubmed: 33262821
Antivir Ther. 2016;21(1):27-35
pubmed: 26069150
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):288
pubmed: 29954344
Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;153:2-11
pubmed: 29225131
Hepatology. 2016 Jan;63(1):261-83
pubmed: 26566064
HIV Med. 2018 Nov;19(10):724-733
pubmed: 30101539
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):64-75
pubmed: 18083463
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):193-200
pubmed: 27753684
Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jun;7(6):402-9
pubmed: 17521593
J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;61(3):388-393
pubmed: 32960984
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e011890
pubmed: 27519923
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 19;14(7):e0219922
pubmed: 31323077
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Apr;17(4):2473-2484
pubmed: 30906435
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 04;14:180
pubmed: 24708626
Sex Transm Infect. 2020 Nov;96(7):509-515
pubmed: 31911426
Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2021 Jul 29;9:25151355211032595
pubmed: 34377929
AIDS. 2009 Nov 27;23(18):2425-30
pubmed: 19617813
Virol J. 2018 Sep 10;15(1):139
pubmed: 30201035
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018 Apr-Jun;36(2):217-223
pubmed: 30084414
Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Mar;4(2):217-21
pubmed: 24761241
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42(1):126-31
pubmed: 16323102
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 10;19(1):156
pubmed: 32912268
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):564
pubmed: 30428847
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 06;(7):CD003510
pubmed: 21735394
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 28;20(40):14598-614
pubmed: 25356024
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):79-84
pubmed: 35621877
Hepatology. 1999 Nov;30(5):1302-6
pubmed: 10534354
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):429-38
pubmed: 22945832
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2013 Jun;4(3):115-7
pubmed: 25083255
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Nov;37(11):e264-e268
pubmed: 30067600
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Oct;24(10):1519-27
pubmed: 24052632
Antiviral Res. 2018 Jun;154:66-86
pubmed: 29649496
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Apr 15;77(5):439-450
pubmed: 29287028
JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12
pubmed: 7823387
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:MR000033
pubmed: 28207928
J Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;214(11):1695-1699
pubmed: 27658693
Viruses. 2019 Nov 19;11(11):
pubmed: 31752284
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 08;378(10):911-923
pubmed: 29514030
Pharmacogenomics J. 2016 Nov;16(6):514-518
pubmed: 26440731
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Apr;34(4):337-342
pubmed: 29368537
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 01;10:105
pubmed: 20193053
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 12;6:CD013653
pubmed: 37306558
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012 Oct;8(10):1305-14
pubmed: 22943210
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 28;7(1):110
pubmed: 30055658
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Jan;31(2):184-190
pubmed: 28064549
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 21;14:120
pubmed: 25416419
J Clin Virol. 2016 Apr;77:32-9
pubmed: 26895227
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68152
pubmed: 23874527
J Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 1;189(7):1185-92
pubmed: 15031786
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999 Jan;36(1):41-66
pubmed: 9989342
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1749-52
pubmed: 22571198
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Nov;55(11):5294-9
pubmed: 21896913
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82
pubmed: 22989478
mSphere. 2019 Oct 23;4(5):
pubmed: 31645430
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490
pubmed: 15205295
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Nov 1;73(3):294-298
pubmed: 27171740
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Feb;50(2):95-106
pubmed: 29020844
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2324-34
pubmed: 27305192
HIV Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;18(2):54-59
pubmed: 28067163
BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
pubmed: 18316340
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Mar;21(4):389-397
pubmed: 31957507
HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2019 Aug 21;11:193-200
pubmed: 31686918
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Dec 23;4:561
pubmed: 22195774
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Dec 4;135(11):982-9
pubmed: 11730399
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Nov 11;5:248
pubmed: 25426075
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2009 Oct;102(4):226-9
pubmed: 19950539
Hepatology. 2018 Apr;67(4):1560-1599
pubmed: 29405329
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2013;28(4):362-71
pubmed: 23385314
Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609-13
pubmed: 9746022
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e019022
pubmed: 28893758
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1593-1603
pubmed: 29694825
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 09;16:393
pubmed: 27506549
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jul;5(7):e357-e365
pubmed: 29925489
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Apr 28;10:20503121221095411
pubmed: 35509955
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227776
pubmed: 31917810
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 May 1;187(5):1113-1122
pubmed: 29126260
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 4;19(1):627
pubmed: 31484515
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216293
pubmed: 31071145
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 3;375(18):1726-1737
pubmed: 27806243
HIV Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):347-54
pubmed: 24422893
AIDS. 2018 Mar 27;32(6):761-765
pubmed: 29334548
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 May;57(5):773-80
pubmed: 21435764
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Feb 1;40(2):e56-e61
pubmed: 33181788
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 30;9:86
pubmed: 20042080

Auteurs

Emmanuel O Ugwu (EO)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria.

George U Eleje (GU)

Effective Care Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, PMB 5001, Nnewi, Nigeria.

Angela O Ugwu (AO)

Department of Haematology and Immunolology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria.

Uchenna I Nwagha (UI)

Department of Haematology and Immunology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria.

Joseph I Ikechebelu (JI)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.

Uchenna A Umeh (UA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Science, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria.

Henrietta U Okafor (HU)

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State, Enugu, Nigeria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH