How and when to measure pH in IVF culture media: validation of a portable blood gas analyzer in two IVF culture dishes for time lapse and conventional incubators.
Analytical validation
Culture media
Embryo
IVF
pH
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
09
02
2023
accepted:
12
05
2023
pmc-release:
01
07
2024
medline:
19
7
2023
pubmed:
14
6
2023
entrez:
14
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Maintaining a stable pH at optimal level in human embryo culture media is crucial for embryo development but poses a challenge for all IVF laboratories. We validate analytically reliable conditions for pH measurement that are as close as possible to the embryo microenvironment during IVF. This was a multicentric study. A Siemens EPOC portable blood gas analyzer was used. The analytical validation was carried out under the culture medium (Global Total HSA®) conditions of use (microdroplets, under oil overlay, in a IVF incubator with (EmbryoScope®) or without a time lapse system (K system G210+®) and using IVF dishes. The validation included repeatability ("within-run" precision), total precision (between-day precision), trueness based on inter-laboratory comparison, inaccuracy based on external quality assessment and comparison to the reference technique. We also assessed the pre-analytical medium incubation time required to obtain a target value. A measurement after an incubation period of 24 to 48 h is more representative of the pH to which the embryo will be exposed throughout the culture. The "within-run" and "between-day" precision show very low coefficients of variation (CV%): 0.17 to 0.22% and 0.13 to 0.34%, respectively, with IVF culture media. Trueness (% bias) range from - 0.07 to - 0.03%. We demonstrate good correlation between EPOC and reference pH electrode with an overestimation of 0.03 pH units of EPOC. Our method demonstrates good analytical performance for IVF laboratories wishing to implement a robust quality assurance system to monitor pH in embryo culture media. Compliance with stringent pre-analytical and analytical conditions is essential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37314570
doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02828-6
pii: 10.1007/s10815-023-02828-6
pmc: PMC10352227
doi:
Substances chimiques
Culture Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1677-1687Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Biol Reprod. 2001 Jun;64(6):1845-54
pubmed: 11369617
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Apr;54(4):585-94
pubmed: 26457784
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 May;37(5):1019-1028
pubmed: 32124192
Mol Reprod Dev. 1998 Aug;50(4):434-42
pubmed: 9669527
Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3441-8
pubmed: 9886531
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 12;13(11):e0206707
pubmed: 30418977
Front Biosci. 2001 May 01;6:D708-30
pubmed: 11333210
Biol Reprod. 2001 Jul;65(1):14-22
pubmed: 11420218
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Jul;39(1):19-26
pubmed: 31109893
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 08;11:600551
pubmed: 33488397
Hum Reprod. 2000 Apr;15(4):896-904
pubmed: 10739839
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jul;21(1):6-16
pubmed: 20570214
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Aug;21(2):219-29
pubmed: 20615756
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Oct;37(4):409-414
pubmed: 30228072
Hum Reprod. 2012 Jul;27(7):1966-76
pubmed: 22552689
Biol Reprod. 2000 Jun;62(6):1526-35
pubmed: 10819752
Mol Reprod Dev. 1998 Jun;50(2):146-53
pubmed: 9590530
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2005;17(3):371-8
pubmed: 15745645
Hum Reprod Update. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):333-9
pubmed: 22311857
Biol Reprod. 2010 Dec;83(6):938-50
pubmed: 20702853
Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 1;99(3):632-41
pubmed: 23357453
Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):605-12
pubmed: 20085915