Cardiotocography in practice: a qualitative study to explore obstetrical care professionals' experiences with using cardiotocography information in Dutch practice.
Fetal medicine
MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
PERINATOLOGY
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Quality in health care
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2023
15 06 2023
Historique:
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
15
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to explore obstetric care professionals' experiences with using cardiotocograph (CTG) information and how they employ this tool in their practice. Qualitative study, involving 30 semi-structured interviews and two focus group sessions. Conventional content analysis was used for data analysis. Amsterdam University Medical Centers in the Netherlands. In total, 43 care professionals participated. The respondents included obstetricians, residents in obstetrics and gynaecology, junior physicians, clinical midwives and nurses. Three main categories were identified that influenced the use of cardiotocography in practice; (1) individual characteristics involving knowledge, experience and personal beliefs; (2) teams involving collaboration in and between shifts and (3) work environment involving equipment, culture and continuing development. This study underlines the importance of teamwork when working with cardiotocography in practice. There is a particular need to create shared responsibility among team members for cardiotocography interpretation and appropriate management, which should be addressed in educational programmes and regular multidisciplinary meetings, to allow learning from colleagues' perspectives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37321812
pii: bmjopen-2022-068162
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068162
pmc: PMC10277076
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e068162Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Br Dent J. 2008 Mar 22;204(6):291-5
pubmed: 18356873
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):866-9
pubmed: 26773808
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:33-47
pubmed: 26165747
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;24(2):84-8
pubmed: 22249147
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Feb;96(2):166-175
pubmed: 27869985
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):926-35
pubmed: 21658193
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1889-1890
pubmed: 34089215
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Dec 27;12:166
pubmed: 23270400
J R Soc Med. 2001 May;94(5):226-31
pubmed: 11385089
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):358-66
pubmed: 20444071
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Apr-Jun;27(2):126-33
pubmed: 23618933
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD006066
pubmed: 16856111