Outcomes and Management of Infants Who Refer Newborn Hearing Screening.
congenital hearing loss
newborn hearing screening
otitis media with effusion
sensorineural hearing loss
vernix
Journal
The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology
ISSN: 1943-572X
Titre abrégé: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0407300
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the implementation of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, early diagnosis and referral has been expedited. Many patients who refer screening pass subsequent testing with otoacoustic emissions (OAE) or auditory brainstem response (ABR). The objective of our study was to identify the incidence and etiology of hearing loss in infants who refer initial testing in an urban, tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology practice. We performed a chart review of infants who were evaluated after referring newborn hearing screening from 2017 to 2021. Data collected included birth history, hospital screening results, subsequent audiology and otolaryngology visit findings, final hearing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. Of the 450 patients, 83.8% (n = 377) had normal hearing bilaterally after repeat testing (OAE and/or ABR). Thirty five patients were diagnosed with otitis media with effusion (OME) (7.8%) and 17 patients (3.8%) were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss. Twenty seven patients (6.0%) were diagnosed with obstructing cerumen/vernix, many times in addition to another diagnosis. Of the 17 patients with sensorineural hearing loss, 2 had genetic syndromes and 2 had congenital cytomegalovirus. Sensorineural hearing loss was significantly associated with the presence of a deafness syndrome ( Our incidence of sensorineural hearing loss was 3.8% (95% CI 2.0, 5.5), compared to rates of 0.44 to 68% in the published literature. Most patients had normal hearing, usually identified after only 1 repeat test. OME requiring myringotomy tube insertion was the most common pathology requiring intervention. Close observation for resolution and intervention, if warranted, is critical to prevent sequelae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37322843
doi: 10.1177/00034894231180949
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1662-1668Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.