Measurement of Upper Extremity-Specific Comfort and Capability.
Journal
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
ISSN: 1940-5480
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Orthop Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9417468
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Oct 2023
15 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
01
02
2023
accepted:
05
05
2023
medline:
6
10
2023
pubmed:
19
6
2023
entrez:
19
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify symptom intensity and magnitude of capability. Upper extremity PROMs were developed shortly after the advent of general health PROMs. PROMs are still primarily research tools, and their use with individual patients is still evolving. When PROMs were developed, the initial and intuitive expectation was a strong correlation of comfort and capability with pathophysiology severity. In other words, people with greater radiographic arthritis or larger degenerative tendon defects were expected to feel worse and do less. After more than 20 years of research using PROMs, it is clear that mindset and circumstances account for more of the variation in PROMs than pathophysiology severity. Mounting research establishes upper extremity PROMs and PROMs in general as useful tools for anchoring and developing comprehensive, biopsychosocial approaches to care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37332222
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00109
pii: 00124635-202310150-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e876-e882Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Références
Levels of evidence are described in the table of contents. In this article references 14, 15 and 16 are level I studies. References 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 24, 26, 35, 40 and 43 are level II studies. References 9, 11, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 41 and 42 and are level III studies. References 13, 28, 29, and 31 are level IV studies. References 2, 5, 6, 12, 15, 18, 36, 37, 44, 45 and 46 are level V studies.
Ware JE Jr: Scales for measuring general health perceptions. Health Serv Res 1976;11:396-415.
Ware JE Jr, Gandek B: Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:903-912.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al.: Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). Am J Ind Med 1996;29:602-608.
Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper Extremity Collaborative Group: Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 2005;87:1038-1046.
Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP: Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000;38:II-28-II-42.
Smith AW, Jensen RE. Beyond methods to applied research: Realizing the vision of PROMIS®. Health Psychol. 2019;38:347-350.
Stoop N, Menendez ME, Mellema JJ, Ring D: The PROMIS global health questionnaire correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Hand 2018;13:118-121.
Kortlever JT, Janssen SJ, van Berckel MM, Ring D, Vranceanu AM: What is the most useful questionnaire for measurement of coping strategies in response to nociception?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:3511-3518.
Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:78.
Bernstein DN, Houck JR, Mahmood B, Hammert WC: Responsiveness of the PROMIS and its concurrent validity with other region- and condition-specific PROMs in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:2544-2551.
Bido J, Sullivan SW, Carr JB 2nd, Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU: PROMIS Global-10 performs poorly relative to legacy shoulder instruments in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021;30:1780-1786.
Jonas WB, Crawford C, Colloca L, et al.: To what extent are surgery and invasive procedures effective beyond a placebo response? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised, sham controlled trials. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009655.
Karjalainen T, Heikkinen J, Busija L, et al.: Use of placebo and nonoperative control groups in surgical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2223903.
Sihvonen Raine, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, et al.: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear. New Engl J Med 2013;369:2515-2524
Schröder J, Goltz L, Knoth H: Sham surgery versus labral repair or biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder: A three-armed randomised clinical trial. Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten 2017 40:1759-1826.
Kroslak Martin, Murrell GeorgeAC: Surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2018;46:1106-1113.
Rohrback M, Ramtin S, Abdelaziz A, et al.: Rotator cuff tendinopathy: Magnitude of incapability is associated with greater symptoms of depression rather than pathology severity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022;31:2134-2139.
Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, Ring D: A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1913-1921.
Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Kobayashi T, Shitara H, Osawa T: Factors involved in the presence of symptoms associated with rotator cuff tears: A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:1133-1137.
Kuo LT, Chen HM, Yu PA, et al.: Depression increases the risk of rotator cuff tear and rotator cuff repair surgery: A nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0225778.
Kim KW, Han JW, Cho HJ, et al.: Association between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Vol 2011;93:556-563.
Becker SJ, Makarawung DJ, Spit SA, King JD, Ring D: Disability in patients with trapeziometacarpal joint arthrosis: Incidental versus presenting diagnosis. J Hand Surg 2014;39:2009-2015.e8.
Kopp B, Furlough K, Goldberg T, Ring D, Koenig K: Factors associated with pain intensity and magnitude of limitations among people with hip and knee arthritis. J Orthop 2021;25:295-300.
Crijns TJ, Brinkman N, Ramtin S, et al.: Are there distinct statistical groupings of mental health factors and pathophysiology severity among people with hip and knee osteoarthritis presenting for specialty care?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:298-309.
Al Salman A, Shah R, Thomas JE, et al.: Symptoms of depression and catastrophic thinking attenuate the relationship of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability with fracture severity. J Psychosomatic Res 2022;158:110915.
Cremers T, Zoulfi Khatiri M, van Maren K, Ring D, Teunis T, Fatehi A: Moderators and mediators of activity intolerance related to pain. J Bone Joint Surg 2021;103:205-212.
Jayakumar P, Overbeek CL, Lamb S, et al.: What factors are associated with disability after upper extremity injuries?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:1256.
De SD, Vranceanu AM, Ring DC: Contribution of kinesophobia and catastrophic thinking to upper-extremity-specific disability. J Bone Joint Surg 2013;95:76-81.
Coronado RA, Seitz AL, Pelote E, Archer KR, Jain NB: Are psychosocial factors associated with patient-reported outcome measures in patients with rotator cuff tears? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476:810-829.
Miner H, Rijk L, Thomas J, Ring D, Reichel LM, Fatehi A: Mental-health phenotypes and patient-reported outcomes in upper-extremity illness. J Bone Joint Surg 2021;103:1411-1416.
Daliri BO M, Azhari A, Khaki S, Hajebi Khaniki S, Moradi A: Which psychological and electrodiagnostic factors are associated with limb disability in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:960-968.
Molleman J, Janssen SJ, Overbeek CL, Ring D: A threshold disability score corresponds with an estimated diagnosis of clinical depression in patients with upper extremity disease. Hand 2015;10:168-172.
Cheng AL, Bradley EC, Brady BK, et al.: The influence of race, sex, and social disadvantage on self-reported health in patients presenting with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022;101:211-216.
Jayakumar P, Teunis T, Vranceanu AM, Lamb S, Ring D, Gwilym S: Early psychological and social factors explain the recovery Trajectory after distal radial fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 2020;102:788-795.
Kroenke K, Monahan PO, Kean J: Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:1085-1092.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, Vet HC, Terwee CB: The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther 2016;20:105-113.
O'Connor CM, Ring D: Correlation of single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) with other patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Arch Bone Joint Surg 2019;7:303-306.
Jayakumar P, Kortlever JTP, Brown LE, Ring D: A two question screen for mental health opportunities. Arch Bone Joint Surg 2021;9:338-344.
Teunis T, Al Salman A, Koenig K, Ring D, Fatehi A: Unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms Limit accommodation of musculoskeletal pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:276-283.
Padua R, de Girolamo L, Grassi A, Cucchi D: Choosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology. EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:779-787.
Moradi A, Mellema JJ, Oflazoglu K, Isakov A, Ring D, Vranceanu AM: The relationship between catastrophic thinking and hand diagram areas. J Hand Surg 2015;40:2440-2446.e5.
Rossano A, Al Salman A, Ring D, Guzman JM, Fatehi A: Do unhelpful thoughts or confidence in problem solving have stronger associations with musculoskeletal illness?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:287-295.
Cook CE: Clinimetrics corner: The minimal clinically important change score (mcid): A necessary pretense. J Man Manipulative Ther 2008;16:E82-E83.
de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL: Measurement in Medicine - A practical guide. U.S.A. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Ring D Commentary on Minimal important changes and differences in elective hand surgery. J Hand Surg2015;40:913.