Ecotoxicity Evaluation of Industrial Waste and Construction Materials: Comparison Between Leachates from Granular Steel Slags and Steel Slags-Containing Concrete Through a Plant-Based Approach.
Allium cepa
Cucumis sativus
Germination
Lepidium sativum
Phytotoxicity
Waste reuse
Journal
Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology
ISSN: 1432-0800
Titre abrégé: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0046021
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jun 2023
21 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
23
6
2023
pubmed:
21
6
2023
entrez:
21
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Steel slags, the main waste product from the steel industry, may have several reuse possibilities. Among others, building applications represent a crucial field. However, the potential impact of harmful substances on the environment should be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess the phytotoxicity of steel slags (SS) and concrete mixtures cast with a partial replacement of SS (CSS). Leaching tests were carried out on four SS and four CSS according to EN 12457-2 and UNI EN 15863, respectively. Each leachate was assayed using root elongation tests on 30 seeds of Allium cepa, Cucumis sativus, and Lepidium sativum, respectively, and on 12 bulbs of A. cepa. The latter also allowed the analysis of other macroscopic parameters of toxicity (turgidity, consistency, colour change and root tip shape) and the evaluation of the mitotic index on 20,000 root tip cells per sample. None of the samples induced phytotoxic effects on the organisms tested: all samples supported seedlings emergence, verified by root elongation comparable to, or even greater than, that of the negative controls, and did not affect cell division, as evidenced by mitotic index values. The absence of phytotoxicity demonstrated by the leachates allows SS and SS-derived concrete to be considered as reliable materials suitable for use in civil constructions or in other engineering applications, with economic and environmental advantages, such as the reduction of the final disposal in landfills as well as the consumption of natural resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37341817
doi: 10.1007/s00128-023-03764-y
pii: 10.1007/s00128-023-03764-y
pmc: PMC10284975
doi:
Substances chimiques
Industrial Waste
0
Steel
12597-69-2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Mutat Res. 1994 Oct 16;310(2):175-85
pubmed: 7523890
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):114012
pubmed: 34731708
Mutagenesis. 2023 Feb 3;38(1):43-50
pubmed: 36342121
Methods Mol Biol. 1995;43:119-27
pubmed: 7550639
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156678
pubmed: 35710005
Environ Res. 2015 Jul;140:102-11
pubmed: 25841179
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2021 Jan;62(1):66-77
pubmed: 32926468
Chemosphere. 2022 Jun;297:134123
pubmed: 35240156
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Aug;142:110-116
pubmed: 28395203
Mutat Res. 1999 May 19;426(2):103-6
pubmed: 10350579
Chemosphere. 2016 Mar;146:547-54
pubmed: 26745383
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Jan 15;208:111586
pubmed: 33396109
Ecotoxicology. 2022 Jul;31(5):689-699
pubmed: 35362805
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 21;10(1):6746
pubmed: 32317769
Science. 2020 Jan 24;367(6476):388-392
pubmed: 31974244
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jun 15;312:114894
pubmed: 35334400
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399):224-226
pubmed: 30026211
Sci Total Environ. 2023 May 1;871:162138
pubmed: 36773912
Acta Biol Hung. 2013 Dec;64(4):490-9
pubmed: 24275594
Environ Res. 2021 May;196:110956
pubmed: 33675797
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2013;48(12):1502-15
pubmed: 23802159
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2022 Dec;109(6):1095-1105
pubmed: 36074129
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Jun 15;432:128658
pubmed: 35290896
J Environ Sci (China). 2023 May;127:349-360
pubmed: 36522067
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 25;18(13):
pubmed: 34202094
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87602-87612
pubmed: 35818017
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 22;13:930148
pubmed: 35814243