Strengthening local government policies to address health inequities: perspectives from Australian local government stakeholders.
Health equity
Health inequalities
Health policy
Local action
Local government
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 06 2023
21 06 2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
30
05
2023
medline:
23
6
2023
pubmed:
22
6
2023
entrez:
21
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With their close connection to community and increasing preventive health remit, local governments are well positioned to implement policies and programs to address health inequities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence of equity-focused policy action in this sector. We aimed to understand how local government representatives approach equity in the development and implementation of health and wellbeing policies and programs, and to identify potential enablers for strengthening an equity focus. We conducted semi-structured interviews (June 2022-January 2023) with 29 health directorate representatives from 21 local governments in Victoria, Australia. Representatives were recruited from urban, regional and rural local government areas, with varying levels of socioeconomic position. Data was analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, informed by social determinants of health theory and a public policy decision making framework. Local governments approach health equity in different ways including focusing on priority populations, disadvantaged geographic areas, or by targeting the upstream determinants of health, such as housing and employment. Enabling factors for more equity-oriented local government policy action included those internal to local governments: (i) having a clear conceptualisation of equity, (ii) fostering a strong equity-centric culture, and (iii) developing organisational-wide competency in health equity. External factors related to key stakeholder groups that support and/or influence local governments included: (iv) strong support from community, (v) state government leadership and legislation, and (vi) supportive local partners, networks and NGO's. Local governments have a responsibility to implement policies and programs that improve health and reduce health inequities. Local government's capacity to leverage resources, structures, processes and relationships, internally and across sectors and community, will be key to strengthening equity-oriented local government health policies and programs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
With their close connection to community and increasing preventive health remit, local governments are well positioned to implement policies and programs to address health inequities. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence of equity-focused policy action in this sector. We aimed to understand how local government representatives approach equity in the development and implementation of health and wellbeing policies and programs, and to identify potential enablers for strengthening an equity focus.
METHODS
We conducted semi-structured interviews (June 2022-January 2023) with 29 health directorate representatives from 21 local governments in Victoria, Australia. Representatives were recruited from urban, regional and rural local government areas, with varying levels of socioeconomic position. Data was analysed inductively using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis, informed by social determinants of health theory and a public policy decision making framework.
RESULTS
Local governments approach health equity in different ways including focusing on priority populations, disadvantaged geographic areas, or by targeting the upstream determinants of health, such as housing and employment. Enabling factors for more equity-oriented local government policy action included those internal to local governments: (i) having a clear conceptualisation of equity, (ii) fostering a strong equity-centric culture, and (iii) developing organisational-wide competency in health equity. External factors related to key stakeholder groups that support and/or influence local governments included: (iv) strong support from community, (v) state government leadership and legislation, and (vi) supportive local partners, networks and NGO's.
CONCLUSIONS
Local governments have a responsibility to implement policies and programs that improve health and reduce health inequities. Local government's capacity to leverage resources, structures, processes and relationships, internally and across sectors and community, will be key to strengthening equity-oriented local government health policies and programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37344850
doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01925-3
pii: 10.1186/s12939-023-01925-3
pmc: PMC10283264
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):185-193
pubmed: 36652648
Health Promot Int. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):881-890
pubmed: 27006364
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jul;49(3):538-554
pubmed: 31014169
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):2290
pubmed: 36474224
Lancet. 2012 Jan 14;379(9811):181-8
pubmed: 22014678
BMC Public Health. 2013 Nov 09;13:1056
pubmed: 24209299
Int J Equity Health. 2010 May 25;9:13
pubmed: 20500850
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Apr;41(2):204-209
pubmed: 27774688
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019 Feb;43(1):81-87
pubmed: 30457190
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30 Suppl 2:ii2-7
pubmed: 26420809
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 15;16:512
pubmed: 27301393
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9
pubmed: 18994664
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Apr;40(2):126-31
pubmed: 26456930
Aust J Prim Health. 2022 Dec;28(6):474-481
pubmed: 35821642
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 24;14:198
pubmed: 24564851
World Health Stat Q. 1998;51(1):3-6
pubmed: 9675803
Health Promot Int. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):953-963
pubmed: 27162245
BMJ. 2010 Feb 09;340:c684
pubmed: 20147359
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):939-46
pubmed: 23531520
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 23;17(1):48
pubmed: 29688855
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;282:114173
pubmed: 34192622
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 10;21(1):129
pubmed: 36088347
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 07;:
pubmed: 34380204
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(1):57-67
pubmed: 28077033
Glob Food Sec. 2022 Mar;32:
pubmed: 36873709
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Apr;44(2):137-144
pubmed: 32101352
Nutr Rev. 2021 Sep 7;79(10):1100-1113
pubmed: 33230539
Global Health. 2017 Feb 6;13(1):7
pubmed: 28166801
Public Health. 2014 Mar;128(3):246-53
pubmed: 24480337
Soc Theory Health. 2023;21(2):119-139
pubmed: 35125968
NAM Perspect. 2022 Jun 13;2022:
pubmed: 36177207
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 10;21(1):887
pubmed: 33971842
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693
pubmed: 32094110
Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Dec;26(3):195-199
pubmed: 26599355
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Jan 25;37:e17
pubmed: 33491618
Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Oct;23(5):440-445
pubmed: 28803611
Nat Food. 2023 Jan;4(1):7-9
pubmed: 37118565
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1997;21(4 Spec No):403-12
pubmed: 9308206
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Oct;35(5):404-6
pubmed: 21973244