Differential Perceptions of What Constitutes a Medical Error Associated with Electronic Medical Records.
healthcare information technology
medical systems
perception of errors
point of view
professional pride
Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
ISSN: 1879-8365
Titre abrégé: Stud Health Technol Inform
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9214582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2023
22 Jun 2023
Historique:
medline:
26
6
2023
pubmed:
22
6
2023
entrez:
22
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Perceptions of errors associated with healthcare information technology (HIT) often depend on the context and position of the viewer. HIT vendors posit very different causes of errors than clinicians, implementation teams, or IT staff. Even within the same hospital, members of departments and services often implicate other departments. Organizations may attribute errors to external care partners that refer patients, such as nursing homes or outside clinics. Also, the various clinical roles within an organization (e.g., physicians, nurses, pharmacists) can conceptualize errors and their root causes differently. Overarching all these perceptual factors, the definitions, mechanisms, and incidence of HIT-related errors are remarkably conflictual. There is neither a universal standard for defining or counting these errors. This paper attempts to enumerate and clarify the issues related to differential perceptions of medical errors associated with HIT. It then suggests solutions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37347563
pii: SHTI230361
doi: 10.3233/SHTI230361
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng