Standardization of rectal cancer surgery and bowel preparation in Austria : A multicenter nationwide survey by the Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology.


Journal

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
ISSN: 1613-7671
Titre abrégé: Wien Klin Wochenschr
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 21620870R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 19 02 2023
accepted: 14 05 2023
medline: 13 9 2023
pubmed: 26 6 2023
entrez: 26 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Standardized management of colorectal cancer is crucial for achieving an optimal clinical and oncological outcome. The present nationwide survey was designed to provide data about the surgical management of rectal cancer patients. In addition, we evaluated the standard approach for bowel preparation in all centers in Austria performing elective colorectal surgery. The Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology (ACO["Arbeitsgemeinschaft für chirurgische Onkonlogie"]-ASSO) conducted a multicenter questionnaire-based study comprising 64 hospitals between October 2020 and March 2021. The median number of low anterior resections performed annually per department was 20 (range 0-73). The highest number was found in Vienna, with a median of 27 operations, whereas Vorarlberg was the state with the lowest median number of 13 resections per year. The laparoscopic approach was the standard technique in 46 (72%) departments, followed by the open approach in 30 (47%), transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in 10 (16%) and robotic surgery in 6 hospitals (9%). Out of 64 hospitals 51 (80%) named a standard for bowel preparation before colorectal resections. No preparation was commonly used for the right colon (33%). Considering the low number of low anterior resections performed in each hospital per year in Austria, defined centers for rectal cancer surgery are still scarce. Many hospitals did not transfer recommended bowel preparation guidelines into clinical practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Standardized management of colorectal cancer is crucial for achieving an optimal clinical and oncological outcome. The present nationwide survey was designed to provide data about the surgical management of rectal cancer patients. In addition, we evaluated the standard approach for bowel preparation in all centers in Austria performing elective colorectal surgery.
METHODS METHODS
The Austrian Society of Surgical Oncology (ACO["Arbeitsgemeinschaft für chirurgische Onkonlogie"]-ASSO) conducted a multicenter questionnaire-based study comprising 64 hospitals between October 2020 and March 2021.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median number of low anterior resections performed annually per department was 20 (range 0-73). The highest number was found in Vienna, with a median of 27 operations, whereas Vorarlberg was the state with the lowest median number of 13 resections per year. The laparoscopic approach was the standard technique in 46 (72%) departments, followed by the open approach in 30 (47%), transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in 10 (16%) and robotic surgery in 6 hospitals (9%). Out of 64 hospitals 51 (80%) named a standard for bowel preparation before colorectal resections. No preparation was commonly used for the right colon (33%).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Considering the low number of low anterior resections performed in each hospital per year in Austria, defined centers for rectal cancer surgery are still scarce. Many hospitals did not transfer recommended bowel preparation guidelines into clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37358643
doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02227-y
pii: 10.1007/s00508-023-02227-y
pmc: PMC10497700
doi:

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

457-462

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Wong MCS, Huang J, Lok V, Wang J, Fung F, Ding H, et al. Differences in incidence and mortality trends of colorectal cancer worldwide based on sex, age, and anatomic location. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2021;19(5):955–966.e61.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.026 pubmed: 32088300
Cardoso R, Guo F, Heisser T, Hackl M, Ihle P, De Schutter H, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(7):1002–13.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00199-6 pubmed: 34048685
Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B, Rausa E, Kelly ME, Petrelli F, et al. Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(2):285–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.037 pubmed: 33280950
Detering R, Karthaus EG, Borstlap WAA, Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Bemelman WA, et al. Treatment and survival of locally recurrent rectal cancer: A cross-sectional population study 15 years after the Dutch TME trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(11):2059–69.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.016 pubmed: 31230980
Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;327(8496):1479–82.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2
van der Pas MHGM, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WCJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0 pubmed: 23395398
Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N. Pathologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(4):e165665.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5665 pubmed: 28196217
Son GM, Kim JG, Lee JC, Suh YJ, Cho HM, Lee YS, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(7):609–17.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0007 pubmed: 20701545
Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(6):815–21.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1620-6 pubmed: 23242270
Persiani R, Agnes A, Belia F, D’Ugo D, Biondi A. The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(11):6190–200.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08115-0 pubmed: 33106887
Burghgraef TA, Sikkenk DJ, Verheijen PM, Moumni ME, Hompes R, Consten ECJ. The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):6337–60.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z pubmed: 35697853 pmcid: 9402498
Güenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jørgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9:Cd1544.
Cao F, Li J, Li F. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(6):803–10.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1361-y pubmed: 22108902
Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–51.
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.20.1747 pubmed: 9842949
Aquina CT, Probst CP, Becerra AZ, Iannuzzi JC, Kelly KN, Hensley BJ, et al. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Surgery. 2016;159(3):736–48.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.021 pubmed: 26576696
Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, Howard L. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(6):851–8.
doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.07.021 pubmed: 16614875
Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM, Fuchs CS, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(10):708–16.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.10.708 pubmed: 12759388
van Oostendorp SE, Belgers HJ, Bootsma BT, Hol JC, Belt E, Bleeker W, et al. Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation. Br J Surg. 2020;107(9):1211–20.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11525 pubmed: 32246472
Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust T, Pfeffer F, Norderval S, Riis R, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg. 2020;107(1):121–30.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459 pubmed: 31802481
Kaech M, Deutschmann E, Moffa G, Haak F, Bucher HC, Kettelhack C, et al. Influence of the introduction of caseload requirements on indication for visceral cancer surgery in Switzerland. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(6):1324–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.006 pubmed: 33895025
Devane LA, Proud D, O’Connell PR, Panis Y. A European survey of bowel preparation in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(11):402–06.
doi: 10.1111/codi.13905
Drummond RJ, McKenna RM, Wright DM. Current practice in bowel preparation for colorectal surgery: a survey of the members of the Association of Coloproctology of GB & Ireland. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(6):708–10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02243.x pubmed: 20184637
Shahab YK, Ooi K, Berney CR. Evaluating the use of mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal resection amongst Australasian surgeons. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(4):297.
doi: 10.1111/ans.12546 pubmed: 24690356
Businger A, Grunder G, Guenin MO, Ackermann C, Peterli R, von Flüe M. Mechanical bowel preparation and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland—a survey. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(1):107–13.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0718-y pubmed: 20972801
Chen M, Song X, Chen LZ, Lin ZD, Zhang XL. Comparing mechanical bowel preparation with both oral and systemic antibiotics versus mechanical bowel preparation and systemic antibiotics alone for the prevention of surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(1):70–8.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000524 pubmed: 26651115
Zhang LM, Schuitevoerder D, White MG, Feldt S, Krishnan P, Hyman N, Shogan BD. Combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation is associated with prolonged recurrence-free survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2021;124(7):1106–14. Dec.
doi: 10.1002/jso.26619 pubmed: 34310702 pmcid: 8610428
Hackl, M. et al. Cancer in Austria, Statistics Austria, 2022, https://www.statistik.at/en/services/tools/services/publikationen/detail/1411 (2022).

Auteurs

Kerstin M Widmann (KM)

Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Christopher Dawoud (C)

Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Felix Harpain (F)

Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Felix Aigner (F)

Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Graz, Graz, Austria.

Jaroslav Presl (J)

Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Harald Rosen (H)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Sigmund Freud Private University (SFU), Vienna, Austria.

Matthias Zitt (M)

Department of General Surgery, Krankenhaus der Stadt Dornbirn, Dornbirn, Austria.

Sebastian F Schoppmann (SF)

Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Klaus Emmanuel (K)

Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Stefan Riss (S)

Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. stefan.riss@meduniwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH