Rewiring innate and adaptive immunity with TLR9 agonist to treat osteosarcoma.
Immunomodulation
Lymphocyte activation
Macrophages
Mouse models
Osteosarcoma
TLR9
Journal
Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR
ISSN: 1756-9966
Titre abrégé: J Exp Clin Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8308647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2023
26 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
07
03
2023
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
28
6
2023
pubmed:
27
6
2023
entrez:
26
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone tumor in children and adolescent. Surgery and multidrug chemotherapy are the standard of treatment achieving 60-70% of event-free survival for localized disease at diagnosis. However, for metastatic disease, the prognosis is dismal. Exploiting immune system activation in the setting of such unfavorable mesenchymal tumors represents a new therapeutic challenge. In immune competent OS mouse models bearing two contralateral lesions, we tested the efficacy of intralesional administration of a TLR9 agonist against the treated and not treated contralateral lesion evaluating abscopal effect. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to evaluate changes of the tumor immune microenviroment. Experiments in immune-deficient mice allowed the investigation of the role of adaptive T cells in TLR9 agonist effects, while T cell receptor sequencing was used to assess the expansion of specific T cell clones. TLR9 agonist strongly impaired the growth of locally-treated tumors and its therapeutic effect also extended to the contralateral, untreated lesion. Multiparametric flow cytometry showed conspicuous changes in the immune landscape of the OS immune microenvironment upon TLR9 engagement, involving a reduction in M2-like macrophages, paralleled by increased infiltration of dendritic cells and activated CD8 T cells in both lesions. Remarkably, CD8 T cells were needed for the induction of the abscopal effect, whereas they were not strictly necessary for halting the growth of the treated lesion. T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of tumor infiltrating CD8 T cells showed the expansion of specific TCR clones in the treated tumors and, remarkably, their selected representation in the contralateral untreated lesions, providing the first evidence of the rewiring of tumor-associated T cell clonal architectures. Overall these data indicate that the TLR9 agonist acts as an in situ anti-tumor vaccine, activating an innate immune response sufficient to suppress local tumor growth while inducing a systemic adaptive immunity with selective expansion of CD8 T cell clones, which are needed for the abscopal effect.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone tumor in children and adolescent. Surgery and multidrug chemotherapy are the standard of treatment achieving 60-70% of event-free survival for localized disease at diagnosis. However, for metastatic disease, the prognosis is dismal. Exploiting immune system activation in the setting of such unfavorable mesenchymal tumors represents a new therapeutic challenge.
METHODS
METHODS
In immune competent OS mouse models bearing two contralateral lesions, we tested the efficacy of intralesional administration of a TLR9 agonist against the treated and not treated contralateral lesion evaluating abscopal effect. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to evaluate changes of the tumor immune microenviroment. Experiments in immune-deficient mice allowed the investigation of the role of adaptive T cells in TLR9 agonist effects, while T cell receptor sequencing was used to assess the expansion of specific T cell clones.
RESULTS
RESULTS
TLR9 agonist strongly impaired the growth of locally-treated tumors and its therapeutic effect also extended to the contralateral, untreated lesion. Multiparametric flow cytometry showed conspicuous changes in the immune landscape of the OS immune microenvironment upon TLR9 engagement, involving a reduction in M2-like macrophages, paralleled by increased infiltration of dendritic cells and activated CD8 T cells in both lesions. Remarkably, CD8 T cells were needed for the induction of the abscopal effect, whereas they were not strictly necessary for halting the growth of the treated lesion. T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of tumor infiltrating CD8 T cells showed the expansion of specific TCR clones in the treated tumors and, remarkably, their selected representation in the contralateral untreated lesions, providing the first evidence of the rewiring of tumor-associated T cell clonal architectures.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Overall these data indicate that the TLR9 agonist acts as an in situ anti-tumor vaccine, activating an innate immune response sufficient to suppress local tumor growth while inducing a systemic adaptive immunity with selective expansion of CD8 T cell clones, which are needed for the abscopal effect.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37365634
doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02731-z
pii: 10.1186/s13046-023-02731-z
pmc: PMC10291774
doi:
Substances chimiques
Toll-Like Receptor 9
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
154Subventions
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : IG #22100
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
ID : Accelerator award # 24296
Organisme : Associazione Bianca Garavaglia
ID : #A/21/01A
Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : ricerca corrente funds
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;11:780264
pubmed: 34956899
Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Jul;2(7):690-698
pubmed: 24866169
Immunotherapy. 2016;8(3):315-30
pubmed: 26860335
Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 1;78(17):4943-4956
pubmed: 29945961
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 02;12:877594
pubmed: 35992832
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(suppl_12):xii33-xii43
pubmed: 29253115
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 04;8(67):111836-111846
pubmed: 29340095
Cancer Lett. 2019 Jan;440-441:116-125
pubmed: 30343113
Cancer Gene Ther. 2022 Dec;29(12):1854-1865
pubmed: 35697801
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):56-61
pubmed: 25838373
Cells. 2021 Jul 02;10(7):
pubmed: 34359840
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 29;7(48):78343-78354
pubmed: 27823976
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5149-5161
pubmed: 28600479
J Clin Invest. 2007 May;117(5):1184-94
pubmed: 17476348
JCI Insight. 2017 Sep 21;2(18):
pubmed: 28931759
DNA Cell Biol. 2005 Feb;24(2):63-72
pubmed: 15699627
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54
pubmed: 22658127
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2110-9
pubmed: 21372215
Int Immunopharmacol. 2016 May;34:101-106
pubmed: 26938675
Cancer Cell. 2012 Mar 20;21(3):309-22
pubmed: 22439926
Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Dec;91:102115
pubmed: 33130422
Virology. 2015 Jul;481:107-12
pubmed: 25771498
Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15;65(8):3437-46
pubmed: 15833879
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):E7240-E7249
pubmed: 27799536
Cancer Discov. 2018 Oct;8(10):1250-1257
pubmed: 30154193
Cancer Discov. 2018 Oct;8(10):1258-1269
pubmed: 30154192
Nat Med. 2007 May;13(5):552-9
pubmed: 17479101
Cell Immunol. 2019 Sep;343:103711
pubmed: 29117898
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;22(15):1995-2006
pubmed: 34058096