The risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is geographically determined but modifiable.
disease-modifying therapy
geography
health expenditure
latitude
secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2023
02 11 2023
Historique:
received:
01
03
2023
revised:
16
05
2023
accepted:
21
05
2023
medline:
9
11
2023
pubmed:
27
6
2023
entrez:
27
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Geographical variations in the incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis have been reported globally. Latitude as a surrogate for exposure to ultraviolet radiation but also other lifestyle and environmental factors are regarded as drivers of this variation. No previous studies evaluated geographical variation in the risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, an advanced form of multiple sclerosis that is characterized by steady accrual of irreversible disability. We evaluated differences in the risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in relation to latitude and country of residence, modified by high-to-moderate efficacy immunotherapy in a geographically diverse cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The study included relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients from the global MSBase registry with at least one recorded assessment of disability. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis was identified as per clinician diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses used the operationalized definition of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and the Swedish decision tree algorithm. A proportional hazards model was used to estimate the cumulative risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by country of residence (latitude), adjusted for sex, age at disease onset, time from onset to relapsing-remitting phase, disability (Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score) and relapse activity at study inclusion, national multiple sclerosis prevalence, government health expenditure, and proportion of time treated with high-to-moderate efficacy disease-modifying therapy. Geographical variation in time from relapsing-remitting phase to secondary progressive phase of multiple sclerosis was modelled through a proportional hazards model with spatially correlated frailties. We included 51 126 patients (72% female) from 27 countries. The median survival time from relapsing-remitting phase to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis among all patients was 39 (95% confidence interval: 37 to 43) years. Higher latitude [median hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% credible interval (1.16, 1.26)], higher national multiple sclerosis prevalence [1.07 (1.03, 1.11)], male sex [1.30 (1.22, 1.39)], older age at onset [1.35 (1.30, 1.39)], higher disability [2.40 (2.34, 2.47)] and frequent relapses [1.18 (1.15, 1.21)] at inclusion were associated with increased hazard of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Higher proportion of time on high-to-moderate efficacy therapy substantially reduced the hazard of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis [0.76 (0.73, 0.79)] and reduced the effect of latitude [interaction: 0.95 (0.92, 0.99)]. At the country-level, patients in Oman, Tunisia, Iran and Canada had higher risks of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis relative to the other studied regions. Higher latitude of residence is associated with a higher probability of developing secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. High-to-moderate efficacy immunotherapy can mitigate some of this geographically co-determined risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37369086
pii: 7208967
doi: 10.1093/brain/awad218
pmc: PMC10629760
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4633-4644Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Références
Neurology. 2011 Feb 8;76(6):540-8
pubmed: 21300969
Mult Scler. 2020 Jan;26(1):79-90
pubmed: 31397221
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;90(11):1193-1200
pubmed: 31217172
Neurology. 2022 Jun 14;98(24):e2401-e2412
pubmed: 35410900
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;81(9):1039-43
pubmed: 20639385
Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):907-11
pubmed: 8780061
Neurology. 2014 Jul 15;83(3):278-86
pubmed: 24871874
Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):499-510
pubmed: 27464262
Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 01;9:16
pubmed: 29449827
Mult Scler. 2021 Mar;27(3):430-438
pubmed: 33210986
Brain. 2003 Apr;126(Pt 4):770-82
pubmed: 12615637
Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2395-405
pubmed: 27401521
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;85(1):67-75
pubmed: 23486991
Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):647-655
pubmed: 27481209
Neurology. 2007 Mar 6;68(10):779-81
pubmed: 17339588
J Neurol Sci. 2003 Feb 15;206(2):135-7
pubmed: 12559500
Mult Scler. 2006 Dec;12(6):769-74
pubmed: 17263005
Mult Scler. 2021 Jul;27(8):1240-1249
pubmed: 33263261
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;82(10):1132-41
pubmed: 21478203