Multi-locus phylogeny of the catfish genus Ictalurus Rafinesque, 1820 (Actinopterygii, Siluriformes) and its systematic and evolutionary implications.
Evolution
Freshwater fishes
Ictaluridae
North America
Taxonomic classification
Journal
BMC ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2730-7182
Titre abrégé: BMC Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101775613
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 06 2023
28 06 2023
Historique:
received:
29
04
2022
accepted:
12
06
2023
medline:
29
6
2023
pubmed:
28
6
2023
entrez:
27
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ictalurus is one of the most representative groups of North American freshwater fishes. Although this group has a well-studied fossil record and has been the subject of several morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies, incomplete taxonomic sampling and insufficient taxonomic studies have produced a rather complex classification, along with intricate patterns of evolutionary history in the genus that are considered unresolved and remain under debate. Based on four loci and the most comprehensive taxonomic sampling analyzed to date, including currently recognized species, previously synonymized species, undescribed taxa, and poorly studied populations, this study produced a resolved phylogenetic framework that provided plausible species delimitation and an evolutionary time framework for the genus Ictalurus. Our phylogenetic hypothesis revealed that Ictalurus comprises at least 13 evolutionary units, partially corroborating the current classification and identifying populations that emerge as putative undescribed taxa. The divergence times of the species indicate that the diversification of Ictalurus dates to the early Oligocene, confirming its status as one of the oldest genera within the family Ictaluridae.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ictalurus is one of the most representative groups of North American freshwater fishes. Although this group has a well-studied fossil record and has been the subject of several morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies, incomplete taxonomic sampling and insufficient taxonomic studies have produced a rather complex classification, along with intricate patterns of evolutionary history in the genus that are considered unresolved and remain under debate.
RESULTS
Based on four loci and the most comprehensive taxonomic sampling analyzed to date, including currently recognized species, previously synonymized species, undescribed taxa, and poorly studied populations, this study produced a resolved phylogenetic framework that provided plausible species delimitation and an evolutionary time framework for the genus Ictalurus.
CONCLUSIONS
Our phylogenetic hypothesis revealed that Ictalurus comprises at least 13 evolutionary units, partially corroborating the current classification and identifying populations that emerge as putative undescribed taxa. The divergence times of the species indicate that the diversification of Ictalurus dates to the early Oligocene, confirming its status as one of the oldest genera within the family Ictaluridae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37370016
doi: 10.1186/s12862-023-02134-w
pii: 10.1186/s12862-023-02134-w
pmc: PMC10304232
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Jan;26(1):1-7
pubmed: 12470932
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001 Jun;19(3):468-78
pubmed: 11399153
BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Oct 06;5:50
pubmed: 16209710
J Fish Biol. 2015 Feb;86(2):493-526
pubmed: 25619312
BMC Genomics. 2016 Sep 07;17:719
pubmed: 27604148
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 8;9:e11492
pubmed: 34285828
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Oct;25(1):172-89
pubmed: 12383759
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 23;7(1):16124
pubmed: 29170403
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3299-3302
pubmed: 29029172
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 May;47(2):729-56
pubmed: 18353691
Syst Biol. 2008 Oct;57(5):758-71
pubmed: 18853362
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0166988
pubmed: 27907107
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Aug;8(8):279-84
pubmed: 21236169
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 May;31(2):416-30
pubmed: 15062784
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Jun;75:78-90
pubmed: 24583020
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772
pubmed: 22847109
Syst Biol. 2018 Sep 1;67(5):901-904
pubmed: 29718447
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Apr;31(1):66-88
pubmed: 15019609
Genetics. 2013 May;194(1):245-53
pubmed: 23502678
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jan;82 Pt A:146-55
pubmed: 25315885
J Mol Evol. 2003 Apr;56(4):464-72
pubmed: 12664166
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1847-57
pubmed: 16214743
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Aug;29(8):1969-73
pubmed: 22367748
Syst Biol. 2008 Feb;57(1):116-30
pubmed: 18288621
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jun 04;11:153
pubmed: 21639931
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
pubmed: 14530136
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 22;277(1697):3071-7
pubmed: 20519219
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Jan;70:210-30
pubmed: 24096056
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3125-35
pubmed: 25274273
Cladistics. 2017 Aug;33(4):406-428
pubmed: 34715724
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9264-9
pubmed: 20439743
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Jun;31(3):1101-13
pubmed: 15120403
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jul;30(7):1720-8
pubmed: 23564938
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jan;62(1):427-46
pubmed: 22056492
Syst Biol. 2018 Sep 1;67(5):830-846
pubmed: 29462495
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Oct 1;35(10):2585-2593
pubmed: 30053098
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
pubmed: 16928733
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Feb;30(2):395-408
pubmed: 14715231
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):95
pubmed: 31023232
BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Sep 07;9:223
pubmed: 19735558
J Fish Biol. 2015 Mar;86(3):993-1015
pubmed: 25644334
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Dec;41(3):636-62
pubmed: 16876440
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Mar;27(3):570-80
pubmed: 19906793
BMC Evol Biol. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):173
pubmed: 30453887
J Biomed Inform. 2006 Feb;39(1):34-42
pubmed: 15922672
Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1162-9
pubmed: 14574645