Changes in Surgical Management of the Axilla Over 11 Years - Report on More Than 1500 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prospective I-SPY2 Trial.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 22 03 2023
accepted: 01 06 2023
medline: 20 9 2023
pubmed: 29 6 2023
entrez: 28 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming less extensive. We evaluated the evolution of axillary surgery after NAC on the multi-institutional I-SPY2 prospective trial. We examined annual rates of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery with resection of clipped node, if present), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and SLN and ALND in patients enrolled in I-SPY2 from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021 by clinical N status at diagnosis and pathologic N status at surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were calculated to evaluate patterns over time. Of 1578 patients, 973 patients (61.7%) had SLN-only, 136 (8.6%) had SLN and ALND, and 469 (29.7%) had ALND-only. In the cN0 group, ALND-only decreased from 20% in 2011 to 6.25% in 2021 (p = 0.0078) and SLN-only increased from 70.0% to 87.5% (p = 0.0020). This was even more striking in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease at diagnosis, where ALND-only decreased from 70.7% to 29.4% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only significantly increased from 14.6% to 56.5% (p < 0.0001). This change was significant across subtypes (HR-/HER2-, HR+/HER2-, and HER2+). Among pathologically node-positive (pN+) patients after NAC (n = 525) ALND-only decreased from 69.0% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only increased from 6.9% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001). Use of ALND after NAC has significantly decreased over the past decade. This is most pronounced in cN+ disease at diagnosis with an increase in the use of SLN surgery after NAC. Additionally, in pN+ disease after NAC, there has been a decrease in use of completion ALND, a practice pattern change that precedes results from clinical trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is becoming less extensive. We evaluated the evolution of axillary surgery after NAC on the multi-institutional I-SPY2 prospective trial.
METHODS METHODS
We examined annual rates of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery with resection of clipped node, if present), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and SLN and ALND in patients enrolled in I-SPY2 from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021 by clinical N status at diagnosis and pathologic N status at surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were calculated to evaluate patterns over time.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1578 patients, 973 patients (61.7%) had SLN-only, 136 (8.6%) had SLN and ALND, and 469 (29.7%) had ALND-only. In the cN0 group, ALND-only decreased from 20% in 2011 to 6.25% in 2021 (p = 0.0078) and SLN-only increased from 70.0% to 87.5% (p = 0.0020). This was even more striking in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease at diagnosis, where ALND-only decreased from 70.7% to 29.4% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only significantly increased from 14.6% to 56.5% (p < 0.0001). This change was significant across subtypes (HR-/HER2-, HR+/HER2-, and HER2+). Among pathologically node-positive (pN+) patients after NAC (n = 525) ALND-only decreased from 69.0% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001) and SLN-only increased from 6.9% to 39.2% (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Use of ALND after NAC has significantly decreased over the past decade. This is most pronounced in cN+ disease at diagnosis with an increase in the use of SLN surgery after NAC. Additionally, in pN+ disease after NAC, there has been a decrease in use of completion ALND, a practice pattern change that precedes results from clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37380911
doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13759-y
pii: 10.1245/s10434-023-13759-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6401-6410

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA210961
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA210961
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Références

Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR, Morton DL, Evans SW, Krasne DL. Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:394–9.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00016 pubmed: 7677468 pmcid: 1234825
Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2345–50.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2345 pubmed: 9196149
Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–8.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00015 pubmed: 8092905 pmcid: 1234400
Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer–a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:941–6.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401 pubmed: 9753708
Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927–33.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2 pubmed: 20863759 pmcid: 3041644
Hunt KK, Yi M, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and reduces the need for axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:558–66.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b8fd5e pubmed: 19730235
Gimbergues P, Abrial C, Durando X, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate in breast cancer patients with a clinically negative axillary nodal status at presentation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1316–21.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9759-z pubmed: 18311507
Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2694–702.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.188 pubmed: 15837984
Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Cormier JN. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:539–46.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5209 pubmed: 16329089
Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, Carlos RC. Breast cancer sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy-systematic review and meta analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:551–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.026 pubmed: 19345896
Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1455–61.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278932 pubmed: 24101169 pmcid: 4075763
Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:609–18.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70166-9 pubmed: 23683750
Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy proven node positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1018.
doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1018
Classe J-M, Loaec C, Gimbergues P, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173:343–52.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5004-7 pubmed: 30343457
Piltin M, Boughey J. Axillary management: how has neoadjuvant chemotherapy changed our surgical approach? Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022;14:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-022-00442-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s12609-022-00442-6
Boughey JC, Alvarado MD, Lancaster RB, et al. Surgical standards for management of the axilla in breast cancer clinical trials with pathological complete response endpoint. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:26.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0074-6 pubmed: 30131975 pmcid: 6098077
Khan TM, Rossi AJ, Suman V, Haffty B, Hernandez JM, Boughey JC. Is axillary radiation not inferior to axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:1526–7.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10830-4 pubmed: 34671883
Clinicaltrials.gov. I-SPY TRIAL: Neoadjuvant and personalized adaptive novel agents to treat breast cancer (I-SPY). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01042379 . Accessed 20 March 2023.
Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:97–100.
doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.68 pubmed: 19440188
Park JW, Liu MC, Yee D, et al. Adaptive randomization of neratinib in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:11–22.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513750 pubmed: 27406346 pmcid: 5259558
Rugo HS, Olopade OI, DeMichele A, et al. Adaptive randomization of veliparib-carboplatin treatment in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:23–34.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513749 pubmed: 27406347 pmcid: 5259561
van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ, et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1999–2009.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967 pubmed: 12490681
DeMichele A, Berry DA, Zujewski J, et al. Developing safety criteria for introducing new agents into neoadjuvant trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2817–23.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2620 pubmed: 23470967 pmcid: 4096560
Yee D, DeMichele AM, et al. Association of event-free and distant recurrence-free survival with individual-level pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of stages 2 and 3 breast cancer: three-year follow-up analysis for the I-SPY2 adaptively randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1355–62.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2535 pubmed: 32701140
Piltin MA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Davis J, Boughey JC. Oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:4795–801.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08900-0 pubmed: 32779055
Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Day CN, et al. Decreasing use of axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2596–602.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6637-9 pubmed: 29978369
Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How often does neoadjuvant chemotherapy avoid axillary dissection in patients with histologically confirmed nodal metastases? results of a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3467–74.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5246-8 pubmed: 27160528 pmcid: 5070651
Srour MK, Tseng J, Luu M, Alban RF, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Patterns in the use of axillary operations for patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a national cancer database (NCDB) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:3305–11.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07540-3 pubmed: 31342364
Naffouje SA, Barker V, Lee MC, Hoover SJ, Laronga C. Surgical management of axilla of triple-negative breast cancer in the Z1071 era: a propensity score-matched analysis of the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:2985–97.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11194-5 pubmed: 35006503
Naffouje SA, Sabesan A, Hoover SJ, Lee MC, Laronga C. Surgical management of the axilla of HER2+ breast cancer in the Z1071 era: a propensity-score-matched analysis of the NCDB. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8777–88.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10411-5 pubmed: 34258723

Auteurs

Judy C Boughey (JC)

Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. boughey.judy@mayo.edu.

Hongmei Yu (H)

Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Catherine Lu Dugan (CL)

Breast Care Center, UCSF Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Mara A Piltin (MA)

Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Lauren Postlewait (L)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Jennifer D Son (JD)

Ourisman Breast Center, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Kirsten K Edmiston (KK)

Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Inova Campus, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Constantine V Godellas (CV)

Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

Marie C Lee (MC)

Division of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Michael J Carr (MJ)

Department of Breast Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Jennifer E Tonneson (JE)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Angelena Crown (A)

True Family Women's Cancer Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Rachel B Lancaster (RB)

Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Hannah E Woriax (HE)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University of School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Cheryl A Ewing (CA)

Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Harrison S Chau (HS)

Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Anne K Patterson (AK)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Jasmine M Wong (JM)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Michael D Alvarado (MD)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Rachel L Yang (RL)

Department of Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, CA, USA.

Theresa W Chan (TW)

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Jori B Sheade (JB)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Gretchen M Ahrendt (GM)

Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, Boulder, CO, USA.

Kelsey E Larson (KE)

Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Kayla Switalla (K)

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Todd M Tuttle (TM)

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Julia C Tchou (JC)

Department of Breast Surgery Research, Penn Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Roshni Rao (R)

Division of Breast Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

Nina Tamirisa (N)

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Puneet Singh (P)

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Rebekah E Gould (RE)

Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Alicia Terando (A)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Huntington Cancer Center/Cedars Sinai Cancer, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Candice Sauder (C)

Department of Surgery, UC Davis Health Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Kelly Hewitt (K)

Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Akiko Chiba (A)

Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Laura J Esserman (LJ)

Departments of Surgery and Radiology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Rita A Mukhtar (RA)

Department of Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH