Health policy under the microscope: a micro policy design perspective.
comparative health governance
expenditure
information
policy design
policy instruments
regulation
taxation
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
accepted:
26
05
2023
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
30
6
2023
entrez:
30
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The comparative study of health policy has focused mainly on the macro-structural dimensions of health systems and reforms that have sought to change these organizational arrangements. Thus, a great deal of attention has been paid to the multiple models of insurance against sickness risks and various modes of organizing and financing healthcare providers. However, little attention has been paid to policy tools and policy design in the health policy domain. This research gap largely impedes a focus on the micro (granular) dimension of health policy, although this is the level at which health policies impact reality and thus deliver progress toward the expected goals. Such a focus on the micro dimension could not only allow a finer-grained comparison of how health systems work but also shed light on how capable health policies are of achieving the expected outcomes. This paper fills this gap by presenting an analytical framework capable of illuminating the granular dimension of policy design (the instrumental delivery package) and shows the analytical relevance of the framework by applying it to the designs of maximum waiting time guarantee and vaccination mandate policies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37388158
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180836
pmc: PMC10300443
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1180836Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Capano and Toth.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Policy Stud J. 2022 May;50(2):432-452
pubmed: 35874188
Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):1-11
pubmed: 24485914
Health Policy. 2009 Apr;90(1):13-25
pubmed: 18838188
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):29-52
pubmed: 15943386
Eur J Health Law. 2000 Jun;7(2):123-43
pubmed: 11789511
Health Policy. 2013 Sep;112(1-2):53-61
pubmed: 23895881
Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(2):i-xxii, 1-192
pubmed: 22575801
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 16;13:320
pubmed: 23953492
Global Health. 2021 Nov 20;17(1):132
pubmed: 34801054
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1998;6:113-34
pubmed: 10662400
Milbank Q. 2019 Dec;97(4):978-1014
pubmed: 31529546
Vaccine. 2018 Nov 19;36(48):7377-7384
pubmed: 30337171
Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Apr;7(2):197-226
pubmed: 22152224
Health Econ Policy Law. 2020 Jul;15(3):289-307
pubmed: 30975243
Health Policy. 2005 May;72(2):201-15
pubmed: 15802155
Health Policy. 2010 Apr;95(1):82-9
pubmed: 19963298
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):535-43
pubmed: 27041537
J Public Health Policy. 2019 Jun;40(2):166-179
pubmed: 30894672
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec 07;7:200
pubmed: 18062824
Vaccine. 2018 Aug 9;36(33):4979-4992
pubmed: 30037416
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Feb;23(1):1-33
pubmed: 9522279
Vaccine. 2003 Jan 30;21(7-8):596-600
pubmed: 12531324
Vaccine. 2016 Dec 20;34(52):6707-6714
pubmed: 27773475
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;17(7):
pubmed: 32235602
Policy Sci. 2023 May 14;:1-23
pubmed: 37361645
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Aug 25;:
pubmed: 34634879
Health Policy. 2013 Dec;113(3):258-69
pubmed: 24095274
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Mar;23(2):83-94
pubmed: 18281310