Panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil as anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Overall survival and subgroup analysis of the randomized phase II VELO trial.
anti-EGFR rechallenge
liquid biopsy
mCRC
panitumumab
trifluridine/tipiracil
Journal
International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 10 2023
15 10 2023
Historique:
revised:
19
05
2023
received:
27
03
2023
accepted:
24
05
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
1
7
2023
entrez:
1
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The randomized phase II VELO trial showed that the addition of panitumumab to trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) as compared to trifluridine/tipiracil in third-line therapy in patients with refractory RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With longer follow-up, final overall survival results and posttreatment subgroup analysis are presented. Sixty-two patients with refractory RAS WT mCRC were randomly assigned to receive, as third-line therapy, trifluridine/tipiracil alone (arm A) or in combination with panitumumab (arm B). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.5-16.7) in arm A compared to 11.6 months (95% CI 6.3-17.0) in arm B (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.54-1.71, P = .9). To evaluate the impact of subsequent lines of treatment, subgroup analysis was performed for the 24/30 patients in arm A, that received fourth-line therapy after disease progression. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 1.44-6.83) for 17 patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge as compared to 3.0 months (95% CI 1.61-4.31) for seven patients that received other therapies (HR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.85, P = .024). Median OS from the start of fourth-line treatment was 13.6 months (95% CI 7.2-20), and 5.1 months (95% CI 1.8-8.3) for patients treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge vs other therapies, respectively (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.81, P = .019). Final results of the VELO trial support the role of anti-EGFR rechallenge in the continuum of care of patients with RAS/BRAF WT mCRC.
Substances chimiques
Panitumumab
6A901E312A
tipiracil
NGO10K751P
Trifluridine
RMW9V5RW38
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05468892']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1520-1528Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.
Références
Ciardiello F, Ciardiello D, Martini G, Napolitano S, Tabernero J, Cervantes A. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(4):372-401. doi:10.3322/caac.21728
Wee P, Wang Z. Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways. Cancers. 2017;9(5):52. doi:10.3390/cancers9050052
Martinelli E, Ciardiello D, Martini G, et al. Implementing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: challenges and future perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(1):30-40. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.007
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(1):10-32. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003
Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486(7404):532-536. doi:10.1038/nature11156
Grothey A, van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303-312. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X
Mayer RJ, van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(20):1909-1919. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414325
Santini D, Vincenzi B, Addeo R, et al. Cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: how to come away from acquired resistance? [published correction appears in Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2906]. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(9):2313-2318. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr623
Cremolini C, Rossini D, Dell'Aquila E, et al. Rechallenge for patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer with acquired resistance to first-line Cetuximab and Irinotecan: a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(3):343-350. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5080
Martinelli E, Martini G, Famiglietti V, et al. Cetuximab Rechallenge plus Avelumab in pretreated patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase 2 single-arm clinical CAVE trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(10):1529-1535. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2915
Sartore-Bianchi A, Pietrantonio F, Lonardi S, et al. Circulating tumor DNA to guide rechallenge with panitumumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase 2 CHRONOS trial. Nat Med. 2022;28(8):1612-1618. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01886-0
Tsuji A, Nakamura M, Watanabe T, et al. Phase II study of third-line panitumumab rechallenge in patients with metastatic wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer who obtained clinical benefit from first-line panitumumab-based chemotherapy: JACCRO CC-09. Target Oncol. 2021;16(6):753-760. doi:10.1007/s11523-021-00845-y
Parseghian CM, Loree JM, Morris VK, et al. Anti-EGFR-resistant clones decay exponentially after progression: implications for anti-EGFR re-challenge. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(2):243-249. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy509
Ciardiello D, Martini G, Famiglietti V, et al. Biomarker-guided anti-Egfr rechallenge therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer [published correction appears in cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;14(16)]. Cancers. 2021;13(8):1941. doi:10.3390/cancers13081941
Ciardiello D, Napolitano S, Famiglietti V, et al. Pretreatment plasma circulating tumor DNA RAS/BRAF mutational status in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are candidates for anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy: a pooled analysis of the CAVE and VELO clinical trials. Cancers. 2023;15(7):2117. doi:10.3390/cancers15072117
Napolitano S, De Falco V, Martini G, et al. Panitumumab plus trifluridine-tipiracil as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor rechallenge therapy for refractory RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. Published online May 18, 2023;e230655. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0655
Vitiello PP, De Falco V, Giunta EF, et al. Clinical practice use of liquid biopsy to identify RAS/BRAF mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a single institution experience. Cancer. 2019;11(10):1504. doi:10.3390/cancers11101504
Moretto R, Rossini D, Capone I, et al. Rationale and study design of the PARERE trial: randomized phase II study of panitumumab re-treatment followed by regorafenib versus the reverse sequence in RAS and BRAF wild-type chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021;20(4):314-317.
Napolitano S, Martini G, Ciardiello D, et al. CAVE-2 (Cetuximab-AVElumab) mCRC: a phase II randomized clinical study of the combination of avelumab plus cetuximab as a rechallenge strategy in pre-treated RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC patients. Front Oncol. 2022;12:940523. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.940523
Martini G, Ciardiello D, Napolitano S, et al. Efficacy and safety of a biomarker-driven cetuximab-based treatment regimen over 3 treatment lines in mCRC patients with RAS/BRAF wild type tumors at start of first line: the CAPRI 2 GOIM trial. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1069370. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1069370