Computed diffusion-weighted imaging with a low-apparent diffusion coefficient-pixel cut-off technique for breast cancer detection.
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
11
2024
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
2
7
2023
entrez:
2
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with low-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-pixel cut-off technique (cDWI cut-off) and actual measured DWI (mDWI). Eighty-seven consecutive patients with malignant breast lesions and 72 with negative breast lesions who underwent breast MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Computed DWI with high b-values of 800, 1200, and 1500 s/mm When an ADC cut-off threshold of 0.3 or 0.6 (× 10 The cDWI cut-off provided better diagnostic performance than mDWI for breast cancer detection. Using the low-ADC-pixel cut-off technique, computed DWI can improve diagnostic performance by increasing contrast and eliminating un-suppressed fat signals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37393536
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220951
pmc: PMC10607411
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20220951Références
Jpn J Radiol. 2009 May;27(4):163-7
pubmed: 19499306
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1030-5
pubmed: 19770326
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Feb;35(2):257-79
pubmed: 22271274
Eur Radiol. 2014 Nov;24(11):2835-47
pubmed: 25103535
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):857-863
pubmed: 30129695
Radiographics. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):1059-84
pubmed: 21768239
Radiology. 1999 Oct;213(1):11-4
pubmed: 10540635
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):74-84
pubmed: 25341078
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):689-97
pubmed: 26418516
Clin Radiol. 2017 Oct;72(10):900.e1-900.e8
pubmed: 28687167
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul;207(1):205-16
pubmed: 27077731
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3669-78
pubmed: 26002130
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):573-81
pubmed: 21852566
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2304-10
pubmed: 24958821
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Nov;29(9):1215-21
pubmed: 21920686
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019 Apr 10;18(2):119-125
pubmed: 30012905
Cancer Imaging. 2014 Apr 22;14:11
pubmed: 25608450
Br J Radiol. 2014 Jul;87(1039):20130807
pubmed: 24834475
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):301-315
pubmed: 28639300
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;50(6):1754-1761
pubmed: 31136044
Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;33(8):951-5
pubmed: 26117691
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6(1):21-7
pubmed: 17510539
Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):747-64
pubmed: 25815803
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2004 Jul 15;3(2):79-85
pubmed: 16093623
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(27):e4086
pubmed: 27399100
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jul;44(1):130-7
pubmed: 26762608
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1436-1450
pubmed: 31786616
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jul;36(1):139-44
pubmed: 22359367
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr;65(4):1118-24
pubmed: 21413077
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Apr;43(4):824-32
pubmed: 26348708
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4860-4871
pubmed: 33443601
Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):504-520
pubmed: 31592734
Clin Radiol. 2015 Mar;70(3):286-94
pubmed: 25555315
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;45(2):337-355
pubmed: 27690173
Insights Imaging. 2012 Aug;3(4):395-409
pubmed: 22695951
Br J Radiol. 2019 Aug;92(1100):20180978
pubmed: 31291125
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jun;49(6):1610-1616
pubmed: 30328211
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):32-41
pubmed: 32427557
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):303-8
pubmed: 12819342
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):119-128
pubmed: 28577079