The Economics of Scientific Publishing.

Antitrust competition government intervention oligopoly public good

Journal

The Yale journal of biology and medicine
ISSN: 1551-4056
Titre abrégé: Yale J Biol Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2023
Historique:
medline: 5 7 2023
pubmed: 3 7 2023
entrez: 3 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The peculiar nature of scientific publishing has allowed for a high degree of market concentration and a non-collusive oligopoly. The non-substitutable characteristic of scientific journals has facilitated an environment of market concentration. Acquisition of journals on a capabilities-based approach has seen market concentration increase in favor of a small group of dominant publishers. The digital era of scientific publishing has accelerated concentration. Competition laws have failed to prevent anti-competitive practices. The need for government intervention is debated. The definition of scientific publishing as a public good is evaluated to determine the need for intervention. Policy implications are suggested to increase competitiveness in the short-run and present prestige-maintaining alternatives in the long run. A fundamental change in scientific publishing is required to enable socially efficient and equitable access for wider society's benefit.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37396985
doi: 10.59249/OMSP9618
pii: yjbm962267
pmc: PMC10303255
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

267-273

Informations de copyright

Copyright ©2023, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

Références

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127502
pubmed: 26061978
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 17;16(6):e0253226
pubmed: 34138913
Toxicol Pathol. 2020 Jun;48(4):607-610
pubmed: 32319351
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jan;104(1):8-10
pubmed: 24228678
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Sep 01;22(9):2743-2747
pubmed: 34582641
Lancet. 1996 May 18;347(9012):1382-6
pubmed: 8637347
Health Technol (Berl). 2022 Jan;12(1):175-179
pubmed: 35047326

Auteurs

Azmaeen Zarif (A)

Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gonville & Caius College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Articles similaires

Gender parity in African science.

Kwabena Boahen Asare, Fatima Cody Stanford
1.00
Humans Female Science Mathematics Technology

Unveiling scientific articles from paper mills with provenance analysis.

João Phillipe Cardenuto, Daniel Moreira, Anderson Rocha
1.00
Paper Scientific Misconduct Publications Humans Publishing

Authorship and Citizen Science: Seven Heuristic Rules.

Per Sandin, Patrik Baard, William Bülow et al.
1.00
Authorship Humans Citizen Science Heuristics Guidelines as Topic
Humans Male Female Students Science

Classifications MeSH